Training as an Innovation Device: Experiences in Dealing with Limitations of Conventional Technological Transfer

• Authors: Carmelo Cannarella , Valeria Piccioni

Abstracts

EN

Designing and running training schemes for farmers are critical steps to support a global strategy to foster sound cooperation between research centres and rural entrepreneurs to improve overall competitiveness of a rural area. This paper outlines the problematic environment of planning and implementing these schemes with a specific emphasis on the great number of difficulties and critical knots hampering the effectiveness of these initiatives: a “paradigm shift ”, and updated approaches and tools, are required firstly to convince decision makers to adopt a renewed and a more participatory approach in training to improve and increase impacts of these schemes and make the involved public and private investments more effective and efficient.

Keywords

EN

training; innovation; rural development; knowledge flows; learning

• Publisher: Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek
• Journal: The New Educational Review
• Year: 2006
• Volume: 8
• Pages: 115-139

Dates

published

2006

Contributors

author

Carmelo Cannarella

• National Research Council of Italy (CNR), Italy

author

Valeria Piccioni

• National Research Council of Italy (CNR), Italy

References

• Abadi Ghadim, A. K., Pannell, D. J., Burton, M. P., (2005): Risk, uncertainty, and learning in adoption of a crop innovation in “Agricultural Economics”, Vol. 33, Issue 1, pp. 1–9.
• Antiniou, P., Ansoff, I., (2004): Strategic Management of Technology, “Technology Analysis & Strategic Management”, Vol. 16, no 2, pp. 275–291.
• Antonelli, C. (2003): The Economics of Innovation, New Technologies and Structural Change. London.
• Arrow, K., (1962): The economic implications of learning by doing, “Review of economic studies” 29, pp. 155–173.
• Asthana, S., Halliday, J., (2004): What can rural agencies do to address the additional costs of rural services? A typology of rural service innovation, “Health and Social Care in the Community”, Vol. 12, Issue 6, pp. 457–465.
• Atran, S., (2001): The trouble with memes: Inference versus imitation in cultural creation, “Human Nature” 12(4), pp. 351–381.
• Boyer, P., (1999): Cognitive tracks of cultural inheritance: how evolved intuitive ontology governs cultural transmission, “American Anthropologist”, 100(4), pp. 876–889.
• Braun, A.R., Thiele, G., Fernández, M., (2000): Farmer Field Schools and Local Agricultural Research committees: complementary platforms for integrated decision-making in sustainable agriculture. London.
• Cannarella, C., Piccioni, V., (2003): Innovation Transfer and Rural SMEs, “Journal of Central European Agriculture”, Vol. 4, n. 4, pp. 372–388.
• Del Monte, A., Papagni, E., (2003): R&D and the growth of firms: empirical analysis of a panel of Italian firms, “Research Policy”, Vol. 32, Issue 6, pp. 1003– 1014.
• Drucker, P., (1999): Innovation and Entrepreneurship.
• Edwards, W. M., Eggers, T.R., (2004): Agricultural Management e-School: Extension Education over the Internet, “American Journal of Agricultural Economics” Vol. 86, Issue 3, pp. 778–781.
• Feldman, M., Desrochers, P., (2003): Research Universities and Local Economic Development: Lessons from the History of the Johns Hopkins University, “Industry and Innovation”, Vol. 10, Number 1, pp. 5–24.
• Franklyn, C. (2003): Why Innovation Fails.
• Fritsch, M., (2003): Does R&D-Cooperation Behavior Differ between Regions?, “Industry and Innovation”, Vol. 10, Number 1, pp. 25–39.
• Galende, J., de la Fuente, J.M., (2003): Internal factors determining a firm’s innovative behaviour, “Research Policy”, Vol. 32, Issue 5, pp. 715–736.
• Garud, R., (1997): On the distinction between know-how, know-why and know-what, ”Advances in strategic management” 14, pp. 81–101
• Geels, F.W., (2004): From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems: insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory, “Research Policy”, Vol. 33, issues 6–7, pp. 897–920.
• Hagmann, J., Chuma, E., Murwira, K., (1997): Kuturaya: participatory research, innovation and extension. In: van Veldhuizen, L., Waters-Bayer, A., Ramirez, R., Johnson, D., Thompson, J., (eds) Farmers’ research in practice: lessons from the field, pp. 320, London.
• Hagmann, J., Chuma, E., Gundani, O., (1997): From teaching to learning. Tools for learning about soil and water conservation. In: ILEIA Newsletter for Low External Input & Sustainable Agriculture, 13(3), pp. 26–27.
• Hall, A., Clark, N., Taylor, S., Sulaiman, V.R., (2001): Institutional learning through technical projects: horticulture technology R&D systems in India. London.
• Hannan, M.T., Freeman, J., (1984): Structural Inertia and Organizational Change “American Sociological Review” 49, pp. 149–164.
• Hearn, G., Rooney, D., Mandeville, T., (2003): Phenomenological Turbulence and Innovation in Knowledge Systems, “Prometheus”, Vol. 21, Number 1, pp. 231–245.
• Hellin, J., Higman, S., (2001): Competing in the market: farmers need new skills, “Appropriate Technology” 28(2), pp. 5–7.
• Henrich, J., (2001): Cultural transmission and the diffusion of innovations, “American Anthropologist” 103(4), pp. 1–23.
• Henrich, J., Boyd, R., (1998): The evolution of conformist transmission and the emergence of between-group differences, “Evolution and Human Behavior”, 19, pp. 215–242.
• Henrich, J., Gil-White, F., (2001): The Evolution of Prestige: freely conferred deference as a mechanism for enhancing the benefits of cultural transmission, “Evolution and Human Behavior”, 22 (3), pp. 165-196.
• Herr, P., Kardes, F., Kim J., (1991): Effects of word-of-mouth and product-attribute information on persuasion: an accessibility-diagnosticity perspective, “Journal of Consumer Research” 17, pp. 454–462.
• Holt, K., (2002): Market oriented product innovation. A key to survival in the third millennium. Kluwer.
• Knudson, W., Wysocki, A., Champagne, J., Peterson, H.C., (2004): Entrepreneurship and Innovation in the Agri-Food System, “American Journal of Agricultural Economics”, Vol. 86, Issue 5, pp. 1330–1336
• Lemon M., Sahota P.S., (2004): Organizational Culture as a Knowledge Repository for Increased Innovative Capacity, “Technovation”, Vol. 24, issue 6, pp. 483– 498.
• Levinthal, D.A., March, J.G., (1993): The Myopia of Learning, “Strategic Managment Journal” 14, pp. 95–112.
• Lipsey, R.G., Carlaw, K.I., (2004): Total factor productivity and the measurement of technological change, “Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue Canadienne d’Economique», Vol. 37, Issue 4, pp. 1118-1150
• Lundstedt, S.B., Moss, T.H., (1989): Managing innovation and change. Kluwer.
• Lundvall, B.A., (1992) National systems of innovations: towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London.
• Marquis, M., Filiatrault, P., (2002): Understanding complaining responses through consumers’ self-consciousness disposition, “Psychology & Marketing” 19 (3), pp. 267–292.
• McAdam, R., (2004): Knowledge creation and idea generation: a critical quality perspective, “Technovation”, Vol. 24, issue 9, pp. 697–705.
• Merrill-Sands, D., Collion, M.-H., (1994): Farmers and researchers: the road to partnership, “Agriculture & Human Values”, 11, pp. 26–37.
• Norton, G.A., Adamson, D., Aitken, L.G., Bilston, L.J,. Foster, J., Franck, B., Harper, J.S., (1999): Facilitating IPM: the role of participatory workshops, “International Journal of Pest Management” 45(2), pp. 85–90.
• Ottosson, S., Björk, E., (2004): Research on dynamic systems-some considerations, “Technovation”, Vol. 24, issue 11, pp. 863–869.
• Pretty, J., Chambers, R., (1994): Towards a learning paradigm: new professionalism and institutions for agriculture. In: Scoones, I., Thompson, J., (eds) Beyond farmer first. Rural people’s knowledge, agricultural research and extension practice, pp. 182–202. London.
• Pretty, J.N., (1995): Regenerating agriculture. Policies and practice for sustainability and self-reliance, pp. 157–160. London.
• Reardon, T., Barrett, C.B., (2000): Agroindustrialization, globalization, and international development. An overview of issues, patterns and determinants, “Agricultural Economics” 23, pp. 195–205.
• Rinne, M., (2004): Technology Roadmaps: infrastructure for innovation, “Technological Forecasting and Social Change”, Vol. 71, no 1–2, pp. 67–80.
• Röling, N., de Jong, F., (1998): Learning: shifting paradigms in education and extension studies, “Journal of Agricultural Education & Extension” 5(3), pp. 143–161.
• Rosenberg, N., (1982): Inside the black box: technology and economics Cambridge.
• Rothwell, R., Zegveld, W., (1982): Innovation and the small and medium sized firms. Kluwer.
• Scott, J.T., (2003): Absorptive Capacity and the Efficiency of Research Partnerships, “Technology Analysis & Strategic Management”, Vol. 15, no 2, pp. 247–253 .
• Solomon, S., Weisbuch, G., de Arcangelis, L., Jan, N., and Staufer, D., (2000): Social percolation models, “Physica” A 277, pp. 230–247.
• Starbird, S.A., (2003): Graduate Agribusiness Management Programs: Too Many and Too Cheap, “Review of Agricultural Economics”, Vol. 25, Issue 1, pp. 271–276
• Tykocinski, O.E., Pittman, T.S., Tuttle, E.E., (1995): Inaction inertia: Forgoing future benefits as a result of an initial failure to act, “Journal of Personality and Social Psychology”, 68, pp. 793–803.
• Varga, A., (1998) University research and regional innovation. A spatial econometric Analysis of academic technology transfers. Kluwer.
• Visser, I., Cawley, S., Röling, N. (1998): A co-learning approach to extension: soil nitrogen workshops in Queensland, Australia, “Journal of Agricultural Education & Extension” 5(3), pp. 179–191.
• Von Zedtwitz, M., Haour, G., Khalil, T., Lefebvre, L.A., (eds.), (2003): Management of Technology: Growth Through Business Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Pergamon.
• Waage, J., (1996): “Yes, but does it work in the field?” The challenge of technology transfer in biological control, “Entomophaga” 41, pp. 315–332.

Identifiers

DOI

10.15804/tner.06.8.1.06

Biblioteka Nauki

28765738