Peer Review in School Self-evaluation: Cultivating Skills in Data Use

• Authors: Stanislav Michek , Milan Pol , Martin Chvál

Abstracts

EN

This paper is focused on peer review used by schools as a potential means of support for mutual learning and the development of staff professionalism. It is based on empirical material obtained from The Road to Quality Improvement1, a Czech national project designed to support self-evaluation in schools. Data from 32 schools were collected by questionnaire surveys, interviews, focus groups and document analysis. Main findings are as follows: (1) a prerequisite for successful peer review is previous experience of evaluation activities and work with data; (2) peer review develops participants’ sensitivity in terms of the need for the development of evaluation skills; (3) evaluation activities and work with data develop participants’ professionalism and their potential to contribute to school development.

Keywords

EN

peer review; work with data; evaluation activities; professionalization; school development

• Publisher: Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek
• Journal: The New Educational Review
• Year: 2013
• Volume: 34
• Pages: 30-40

Dates

published

2013

Contributors

author

Stanislav Michek

• University of Hradec Králové

author

Milan Pol

• Masaryk University

author

Martin Chvál

• Charles University

References

• Davidsdottir, S. , Lisi, P. (2012). Spolupráce učitelů a jak ji podněcovat (poznatky z longitudinální a průřezové studie interní evaluace na Islandu). Studia paedagogica, 17(2), 51–70.
• Dvořák, D. (2012) Nový institucionalismus v pedagogice. Studia paedagogica, 17(2), 9–26.
• Fullan, M. (2001). The Meaning of Educational Change. New York – London: Teachers College Press – Routledge Falmer.
• Goldstein, J. (2004). Making Sense of Distributed Leadership: The Case of Peer Assistance and Review. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 26(2), 173–197.
• Guide to Using Data in School Improvement Efforts. A Compilation of Knowledge From Data Retreats and Data Use at Learning Point Associates. (2004). http:// learningpt.org/pdfs/datause/guidebook.pdf Retrieved 20.12.12.
• Gutknecht-Gmeiner, M. (eds.) (2007). European Peer Review Manual for initial VET. Vienna: öibf.
• Gutknecht-Gmeiner, M. (2008) Externe Evaluierung durch Peer Review. Qualitätssicherung und – entwicklung in der beruflichen Erstausbildung. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.
• Johnson, S.M. , Fiarman, S.E. (2012). The potential of peer review. Educational Leadership, 70(3), 20–25.
• Kekule, M. (2012). Rámec pro vlastní hodnocení školy. Metodický průvodce. Praha: NÚV.
• Leithwood, K. (2001) School leadership in the context of accountability policies. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 4(3), 217–235.
• Nevo, D. (2001). School Evaluation: Internal or External? Studies in Educational Evaluation, 27(2), 95–106
• Pol, M. , Hloušková, L. , Lazarová, B. , Novotný, P. , Sedláček, M. (2012). Organizační učení v realitě života školy: impulzy, témata, strategie řízení. Studia paedagogica, 17(2), 27–50.
• Stufflebeam D.L. , Shinkfield A.J. (2007). Evaluation, Theory, Models & Applications. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
• Vanhoof, J. Verhaeghe, G. Petegem, P.V. , Valcke M. (2013). Improving Data Literacy in Schools: Lessons from the School Feedback Project. In: K. Schildkamp et al. (eds.), Data-based Decision Making in Education, Studies in Educational Leadership 17 (pp. 113–134). Dordrecht: Springer Science+Business Media.
• Verdung, E. (2009). Public Policy and Program Evaluation. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

Identifiers

DOI

10.15804/tner.13.34.4.02

Biblioteka Nauki

16530322