Virtual Consumer versus Internet Creator, or Attitudes of Polish Teachers to Online Early School Education. Conclusions for Practice

• Authors: Kamila Majewska

Abstracts

EN

The aim of the present research was to assess the degree of preparation, methods of use, and the ability to create online educational resources by Polish teachers of early school education. The article presents the results of pilot studies carried out under the NP.-2550 grant, as well as the results of proper research conducted in 2017 in a group of 340 teachers. The selection of the research group was random. The collected data showed current trends, and made it possible to address the issue of a virtual consumer and an online creator from the perspective of a teacher.

Keywords

EN

early school education; virtual consumer; Internet creator; Information Technology; virtual space

• Publisher: Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek
• Journal: The New Educational Review
• Year: 2019
• Volume: 57
• Pages: 210-222

Dates

published

2019

Contributors

author

Kamila Majewska

• Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun

References

• Brunelle, E.A. (1970). Creative Intelligence and Freshmen English Problem. Journal of Genetic Psychology 118: 3-12.
• Day, Ch. (1999). Developing Teachers: The Challenges of Lifelong Learning (Educational Change and Development Series). London: Routledge.
• Day, Ch. (2004). A Passion for Teaching. London: Routledge. Florida, R. (2012), The Rise of the Creative Class, revisited edition, Basic Books, New York.
• Fromm, E. (1959). The creative attitude [in:] H.H. Anderson (Ed.) Creativity and its cultivation, 44-54. New York: Harper & Brothers.
• Groborz, M., Nęcka, E. (2003). Creativity and Cognitive Control: Explorations of Generation and Evaluation Skills. Creativity Research Journal 15(2):183-197
• Grohman, M.G., Szmidt, K.J. (2013). Teaching for Creativity: Hov to Shape Creative Attitudes in Teachers and in Students [in:] M.B. Gregerson, H.T. Snyder, J.C. Kaufman (Ed.) Teaching Creatively and Teaching Creativity, 15-36, Springer.
• Hurlock, E.B. (2017). Child development. 6 edition. New Delhi: McGraw Hill Education.
• Majewska, K. (2018). Modern Educational Tools in the Teacher’s Work. The New Educational Review 51: 125-138. DOI: 10.15804/tner.2016.45.3.10.
• Nęcka, E. (2003). Creative interaction: A conceptual schema for the process of producing ideas and judging the outcomes, from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/232546270_Creative_interaction_A_conceptual_schema_for_the_process_of_producing_ideas_and_judging_the_outcomes accessed: 2018-02-10
• Sekowski, A., Siekanska, M. and Klinkosz, W. (2009). On Individual Differences in Giftedness [in:] L.V. Shavinina (Ed.) International Handbook on Giftedness, Part One. Springer, 467-486.
• Siemieniecka, D., Kwiatkowska, W., Majewska, K., Skibińska, M. (2018). Interactive media in education [in:] E. Baron-Polańczyk (Ed.) ICT in Educational Design, Oficyna Wydawnicza Uniwersytetu Zielonogórskiego.
• Simens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A Learning Theory for the Digital Age, from: http://er.dut.ac.za/bitstream/handle/123456789/69/Siemens_2005_Connectivism_A_learning_theory_for_the_digital_age.pdf accessed: 2018-01-19.
• Słownik Języka Polskiego PWN (Polish Language Dictionary PWN), from: https://sjp.pwn.pl/sjp/tworczosc;2531502.html accessed: 2018-01-09.
• Tatarkiewicz, W. (1980). A History of Six Ideas: An Essay in Aesthetics, Melbourne, International Philosophy Series 5.

Identifiers

DOI

10.15804/tner.19.57.3.17

Biblioteka Nauki

1967573