Development and application of the measures of school value, teacher autonomy, and teacher motivation

• Authors: Shwu Ming Wu

Abstracts

EN

Psychometrically sound and practical measures of school value, teacher autonomy, and teacher motivation were developed. Further, this study examined relationships among school value, teacher autonomy, and teacher motivation and compared the differences between elementary and secondary school teachers in those variables. Findings showed that those measures are reliable and valid. Also, elementary school teachers scored higher in those three variables than secondary school teachers. Particularly, school value and teacher autonomy were significant predictors of teacher motivation. The implication for school organization is to enhance positive school value and provide teachers with more autonomy, which will encourage teacher motivation.

Keywords

EN

school value; teacher autonomy; teacher motivation

• Publisher: Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek
• Journal: The New Educational Review
• Year: 2015
• Volume: 39
• Pages: 240-250

Dates

published

2015

Contributors

author

Shwu Ming Wu

References

• Bedny, G., & Karwowksi, W. (2006). The self-regulation concept of motivation at work. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 7, 413-436.
• Buelens, M., & Van den Broeck, H. (2007). An analysis of differences in work motivation between public and private sector organizations. Public Administration Review, 67, 65-74.
• Chen, J.S. (2004). A study on interactions between teacher autonomy and school administration The case of junior high schools. U npublished Master Thesis, YuanZe University.
• Chen, C.C., & Chiu, S.F. (2009). The mediating role of job involvement in the relationship between job characteristics and organizational citizenship behavior. The Journal of Social Psychology, 149, 474-494.
• Chung, J.C. (1997). A study of influences on elementary school teacher empowerment. Journal of Chiayi Teacher College, 10, 57-186.
• Cranston, N.C. (2000). Teachers as leaders: A critical agenda for the new millennium. Asia Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 28, 123-131.
• De Jesus, S.N., & Lens, W. (2005). An integrated model for the study of teacher motivation. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 54, 119-134.
• Dee, J.R., Henkin, A.B., & Duemer, L. (2003). Structural antecedents and psychological correlates of teacher empowerment. Journal of Educational Administration, 41, 257-277.
• Gellatly, I.R., & Irving, P.G. (2001). Personality, autonomy, and contextual performance of managers. Human Performance, 14, 231-245.
• Hassan, A. (2007). Human resource development and organizational values. Journal of European Industrial Training, 31, 435-448.
• Heck, R.H., & Marcoulides, G.A. (1996). School culture and performance: Testing the invariance of an organizational model. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 7, 76-95.
• LaCoe, C.S. (2006). Decomposing teacher autonomy: A study investigating types of teacher autonomy and how current public school climate affects teacher autonomy. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
• Losos, L.W. (2000). Comparing the motivation levels of public, private and parochial high school teachers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Saint Louis University.
• Maslowski, R. (2001). School culture and school performance. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Twente.
• Ofoegbu, F.I. (2004). Teacher motivation A factor for classroom effectiveness and school improvement. College Student Journal, 38, 81-89.
• Pang, N.S.K. (2001). What we know and how we know it: A preliminary study of managerial practices of high schools in Shanghai. Paper presented at the annual meeting of American Educational Research Association, Seattle, Washington.
• Pang, N.S.K. (2006). The organizational values of Gimnazija in Slovenia. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 34, 319-343.
• Pearson, L.C., & Hall, B.C. (1993). Initial construct validation of the teaching autonomy scale. The Journal of Educational Research, 86, 172-177.
• Pearson, L.C., & Moomaw, W. (2005). The Relationship between teacher autonomy and stress, work satisfaction, empowerment, and professionalism. Educational Research Quarterly, 29, 37-53.
• Runhaar, P., Konermann, J., & Sanders, K. (2013). Teachers’ organizational citizenship behavior: Considering the roles of their work engagement, autonomy and leader-member exchange. Teaching and Teacher Education, 30, 99-108.
• Sanchez-Perkins, R. (2002). Relationship between teachers’ perceptions of principals’ leadership behavior and level of work motivation. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Texas-Pan American.
• Scheerens, J. (1992). Effective schooling: research, theory and practice. London: Cassell.
• Sinclair, C. (2008). Initial and changing student teacher motivation and commitment to teaching. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 36, 79-104.
• Somech, A., & Ron, I. (2007). Promoting organizational citizenship behavior in schools: the impact of individual and organizational characteristics. Educational Administration Quarterly, 43, 38-66.

Identifiers

DOI

10.15804/tner.2015.39.1.20

Biblioteka Nauki

2012447