The study of EFL teachers’ instruction formalization in LMS

• Authors: Elena V. Kostareva , Tatyana M. Permyakova

Abstracts

EN

The paper focuses on the formalization of English as foreign language teachers’ instruction in LMS eFront. Instruction is considered as a minimum teaching method unit with (in)variable parameters in relation to the knowledge object, students’ activity, and control. The two approaches, i.e., information-centered and student-centered, are studied in its formalization. The paper provides the results of a two-stage analysis: 1) semi-structured interviews with EFL teachers at the tertiary level, and 2) teachers’ and students’ survey evaluating EFL instruction. Important findings include advantages of instruction formalization in technological simplification and quality control in course development, and also serve to enhance further research agenda.

Keywords

EN

teachers’ instruction; EFL; formalization; educational environment; information- and learner-centered approaches

• Publisher: Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek
• Journal: The New Educational Review
• Year: 2016
• Volume: 43
• Pages: 212-221

Dates

published

2016

Contributors

author

Elena V. Kostareva

author

Tatyana M. Permyakova

References

• Anstrand, D.&Kirkbird, E. (2002). The Education Environment Program. Retrieved 26/06/2010, from http://www.designshare.com/Research/Anstrand_Kirkbride/EEP.htm
• Bloom, B.S. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals, Susan Fauer Company, Inc. pp. 201-207.
• Bourdeau, J., Mizoguchi, R. (1999). Ontological Engineering of Instruction: A Perspective, Proceedings of AIED’99, 1999, pp. 620-623.
• Cooper, G. (1998). Research into Cognitive Load Theory and Instructional Design at UNSW, University of New South Wales, Australia.
• Educational environment. (2010). US Department of Defense education activity web-site. Retrieved 26/06/2010, from http://www.am.dodea.edu/ddessasc/environment/environment.html
• Gagne, R. (1985). The Conditions of Learning (4th ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
• Hmelo-Silver, C.E., Duncan, R.G., Chinn, C.A. (2007). Scaffolding and Achievement in Problem-Based and Inquiry Learning: A Response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006), Educational Psychologist, 42 (2), pp. 99-107.
• Huitt, W. (2001). Motivation to learn: An overview, Educational Psychology Interactive. Valdosta, GA: Valdosta State University.
• Konrad, J. (2005). Learning Motivation Of Lower Qualified Workers, Centre for Applied Research in Education, University of East Anglia. Retrieved 26/06/2010 from http://edutechwiki.unige.ch/en/Motivation#Motivation_in_education
• Manninen, J. (2003). Adult participation in dream society-images of education as motivational barriers, Current Issues in Adult Learning and Motivation. Ljubljana: Slovenian Institute for Adult Education.
• Marin-Diaz, V. (2014). Online instruction in Spanish higher education. A study conducted at the faculty of Education of the University of Cordoba (Spain), The New Educational Review, 35 (1), pp. 77-87.
• Merrill, M.D. (2002). First principles of instruction, Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(3), pp. 43-59. Rukavishnikova, N.A. (2006-2007). Report on Research Learning Content Management System Conception, National Project Framework. July 2006-January 2007. [in Russian].
• Rukavishnikova, N.A. (2007). Automation of project components as a means of quality control for learning course, Perm State University Herald. University Studies. Classic University in Russian Educational Space, vol. 6. pp. 154-157. [in Russian].
• Ruohotie, P. (2000). Conative constructs in learning, Conative constructs and self-regulated learning, Hameenlinna: Research Centre for Vocational Education
• Schneider, D. (2010). First principles of instruction. Retrieved 9/02/2010 from http://edutechwiki.unige.ch/en/First_principles_of_instruction
• Schwier, R. (2010). Tools for doing learning analytics in open education? Retrieved 26/06/2010 from http://opencontent.org/blog/archives/1387
• Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning, Cognitive Science, 12, pp. 257-285.
• Tabbers, H.K., Martens, R.L. van Merriënboer, J.J.G. (2004). Multimedia instructions and cognitive load theory: Effects of modality and cueing, British Journal of Educational Psychology, Volume 74, Number 1, March 2004, pp. 71-81(11).
• Van Merriënboer, J.J.G., Clark, R.E., & De Croock, M.B.M. (2002). Blueprints for complex learning: The 4C/ID-model, Educational Technology, Research and Development, 50(2), pp. 39-64.
• Wiley, D.A. (2000). Connecting learning objects to instructional design theory: A definition, a metaphor, and a taxonomy, The Instructional Use of Learning Objects: Online Version. Retrieved 18/05/2001 from: http://reusability.org/read/chapters/wiley.doc

Identifiers

DOI

10.15804/tner.2016.43.1.18

Biblioteka Nauki

2005018