Living Values education in teaching Materials to Develop students’ Civic Disposition

• Authors: Kokom Komalasari , . Sapriya

Abstracts

EN

The study describes a model of living values education in teaching materials and its impact on the civic disposition of students. It employs the design of research and development in Civic education department, Indonesia University of education. The model of living values education in teaching materials is an integration of the living values in the teaching materials presented in the framework of the material. It includes introduction, keyword, map of concepts, subject matter, discussion, living values, conclusions, reflection on the value application, and references. The application of the model of living values education in teaching materials significantly affects students’ civic disposition.

Keywords

EN

living values education; teaching materials; civic disposition; student

• Publisher: Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek
• Journal: The New Educational Review
• Year: 2016
• Volume: 44
• Pages: 107-121

Dates

published

2016

Contributors

author

Kokom Komalasari

author

. Sapriya

References

• Allwright, r.L. (1990). What do we want teaching materials for? In r. rossner & r. Bolitho, (eds.), Currents in language teaching. USA: oxford University Press.
• Bennet, W.J. (1991). educational for democracy. In M. rauner (ed). Civic Education : An Annotated Bibliography. CIVNeT.
• Borg, W.r., Gall, M.d. (1989). Educational Research: An Introduction (5th ed). New york: Longman.
• Branson, M.S. (1998). The Role of Civic Education. Calabasas: Center for Civic education.
• Civitas International. (1998). International Partnership for Civic Awareness Conferences Report. Strasbourg: Civitas International.
• Cogan, J.J., derricott, r. (1998). Citizenship for the 21st Century: an International Perspective on Education. London: Kogan Page.
• el-Hassan, K., Kahil, r. (2005). The effect of ‘Living Values: An educational Program’ on Behaviors and Attitudes of elementary Students in a Private School in Lebanon. Early Childhood Education Journal, 33: 81-90.
• Fraenkel, J.r., Wallen, N.e. (2006). How to Design and Evaluate in Research. New york: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
• Grosser, M. (2007). effective Teaching: Linking Teaching to Learning Functions. South African Journal of Education, 27: 37-52.
• Hermann. (1972). Value Theory (Axiology). The Journal of Value Inquiry, VI: 163-184.
• Karhami, A.K. (2000). Panduan Pembelajaran Fisika SLTP. Jakarta: departemen Pendidikan Nasional.
• Kerr, d. (1999). Citizenship Education: an International Comparison. London: National Foundation for educational research.
• Kitao, K., Kitao, S.K. (1997). Selecting and developing Teaching/Learning Materials, The Internet TESL Journal, IV (4). Avalable at http://iteslj.org/Articles/Kitao-Materials.html. Accessed 2 January 2013.
• Koesoema, d.A. (2010). Pendidikan Karakter: Startegi Mendidik Anak di Zaman Global. Jakarta: Kompas Gramedia.
• Komalasari, K. (2012). The Living Values-Based Contextual Learning to develop the Students’ Character. The Journal of Social Sciences, 8: 246-251. doI: 10.3844/ jssp.2012.246.251.
• Komalasari, K., Saripudin, d, Masyitoh, I.S. (2014). Living Values education Model in Learning and extracurricular Activities to Construct the Students’ Character. Journal of Education and Practice, 5: 166-174.
• Lickona, T. (1992). Educating for Character (How Our Schools Can Teach Respect and Responsibility). New york: Bantam Books.
• Littlejohn, A., Windeatt, S. (1989). Beyond language learning: Perspective on materials design. In rK Johnson (ed). The second language curriculum. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Lovat, T., Toomey, r., dally, K., Clement, N. (2009). Project to test and measure the impact of values education on student effects and school ambience. Final report for the Australian Government department of education, employment and Workplace relations (deeWr) by The University of Newcastle. Canberra: deeWr. Available at: http://www.livingvalues.net/research.html. (Accessed on November 8, 2013).
• Nasution, S. (1994). Berbagai Pendekatan dalam Proses Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
• Quigley, C.N., Buchanan, Jr. J.H., Bahmueller, C.F. (1991). Civitas: A Framework for Civic Education. Calabasas: Center for Civic education.
• Saripudin, d., Komalasari, K. (2015). Living Values education in School’s Habituation Program and Its effect on Student’s Character development.. The New educational review, 39 (51-62).
• Somantri, N. (2001). Menggagas Pembaharuan Pendidikan IPS. Bandung: remadja rosdakarya.
• Shadish, W.r., Cook, d.T., Campbell, T.d. (2002). Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Design for Generalized Causal Inference. Boston, New york.: Houghton Mifflin Company
• Suryadi, A. (2006). Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Menyongsong Masa depan Bangsa tahun 2025. Acta Civicus: Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan, 3: 12-13.
• Taba, H. (1962). Curiculum Development, Theory and Practice. New york : Harcourt, Brace & World.
• Tillman, d. (2004). Living Values: Activities for Children Ages 8-14. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia.
• Wahab, A.A. (2006). Pengembangan Konsep dan Paradigma Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Baru Indonesia bagi Terbinanya Warga Negara Multidimensional Indonesia. In Budimansyah, d., Syaifullah (ed.), Pendidikan Nilai Moral dalam Dimensi Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan. Bandung: Laboratorium Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan FPIPS UPI.

Identifiers

DOI

10.15804/tner.2016.44.2.09

Biblioteka Nauki

2005002