Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2016 | 44 | 125-138

Article title

Investigating the relationship between the student’s Ability and Learning Preferences: evidence from Year 7 Mathematics students

Content

Title variants

Languages of publication

Abstracts

EN
In the last decade, the emergence of diverse students in a streamed class based on the mathematical ability brought upon challenges for the teacher to find an approach which could accommodate all students. This study aims to investigate the connection of students’ ability with their learning preferences in mathematics by applying differentiated instruction using tiered assignments and parallel tasks. This qualitative approach was used for this study from a sample of year 7 mathematics students within Pengukuhan Kemahiran Asas programme (PeKA) (the Basic Skills Strengthening programme), which revolved upon low ability for students with very weak numeracy skills. The findings in general revealed that there is an improvement in their performance.

Year

Volume

44

Pages

125-138

Physical description

Dates

published
2016

Contributors

References

  • Anderson, C., & Kilduff, G.J. (2009). Why do dominant personalities attain influence in face-to-face groups? The competence-signaling effects of trait dominance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(2), 491-503.
  • Argote, L., Ingram, P., Levine, J.M., & Moreland, r.L. (2000). Knowledge transfer in organizations: Learning from the experience of others. organizational behavior and human decision processes, 82(1), 1-8.
  • Boud, d., Keogh, r., & Walker, d. (2013). Reflection: Turning experience into learning. New york and London: routledge.
  • entwistle, N., & ramsden, P. (2015). Understanding Student Learning (routledge revivals). New york and London: routledge.
  • ernest, J.M., Thompson, S.e., Heckaman, K.A., Hull, K., & yates, J. (2011). effects and social validity of differentiated instruction on student outcomes for special educators. The Journal of the International Association of Special Education, 12(1), 33-41.
  • Frey, N., & Fisher, d. (2013). A formative assessment system for writing improvement. English Journal, 103(1), 66-71.
  • Fürnkranz, J., & Hüllermeier, e. (2011). Preference learning (pp. 789-795). Springer US.
  • Ireson, J., Clark, H., & Hallam, S. (2002). Constructing ability groups in the secondary school: Issues in practice. School Leadership & Management, 22(2), 163-176.
  • Kilgour, P. (2009). Problems arising from streaming mathematics students in Australian Christian secondary schools: To stream or not to stream? TEACH Journal of Christian Education, 2(1), 33-37.
  • Kutnowski, M. (2005). In practice-This is why we teach: Igniting a passion for learning in linked courses. About Campus, 10(1), 23-26.. Feedback on learning achievement: rhetoric and reality. Teaching in Higher Education, 11(4), 441-456.
  • Kutnowski, M. (2005). In practice-This is why we teach: Igniting a passion for learning in linked courses. About Campus, 10(1), 23-26.
  • Levy, H.M. (2008). Meeting the needs of all students through differentiated instruction: Helping every child reach and exceed standards. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 81(4), 161-164.
  • Mayer, r.e., & Massa, L.J. (2003). Three facets of visual and verbal learners: cognitive ability, cognitive style, and learning preference. Journal of educational psychology, 95(4), 833.
  • Orrell, J. (2006). Feedback on learning achievement: rhetoric and reality. Teaching in Higher Education, 11(4), 441-456.
  • Othman, H.r.H., Suhaimi, z., Shahrill, M., & Mahadi, M.A. (2015). To pair or not to pair: Investigating the dynamics of teacher-student interactions in different classroom settings. Paper presented at the 6th International Conference on New Horizons in education (INTe 2015), Barcelona, Spain, 10-12 June 2015.
  • Riding, r.J., & Sadler-Smith, e. (1997). Cognitive style and learning strategies: Some implications for training design. International Journal of Training and Development, 1(3), 199-208.
  • Subban, P. (2006). differentiated Instruction: A research Basis. International education journal, 7(7), 935-947.
  • Sternberg, r.J. (2002). What does it mean to be smart? California Journal of Science Education, 2(2), 99-109.
  • Valiande, A.S., Kyriakides, L., & Koutselini, M. (2011). Investigating the impact of differentiated instruction in mixed ability classrooms: Its impact on the quality and equity dimensions of education effectiveness. Paper presented at International Congress for School effectiveness and Improvement 2011. Springwood, New South Wales Australia.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

Biblioteka Nauki
2005000

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.ojs-doi-10_15804_tner_2016_44_2_10
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.