Developing a General Scale for Testing the Amount of the Individual’s Susceptibility to Performance Contagion

• Authors: Farid Ahmadi

Abstracts

EN

Performance contagion is an environmental influential factor that leads to change in the performance of a person who is susceptible to contagion. For the purpose of constructing a conceptual model of employees’ susceptibility to job performance contagion, a general scale for testing the amount of the individual’s susceptibility to performance contagion was developed in the present study. This scale was used in developing a questionnaire. Then the questionnaire was distributed to the 187 non-teaching staff of the Science and Research branch of Islamic Azad University and its validity, reliability, constructrelated evidence and contentrelated evidence were studied.

Keywords

EN

contagion; job performance; performance contagion; susceptibility to performance contagion

• Publisher: Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek
• Journal: The New Educational Review
• Year: 2016
• Volume: 45
• Pages: 17-27

Dates

published

2016

Contributors

author

Farid Ahmadi

References

• Aarts, H., Gollwitzer, P.M., & Hassin, R.R. (2004). Goal contagion: Perceiving is for pursu ing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 23-37. Ahmadi,F.& Mirseppasi, N.(2010). Performance contagion and human research layout: New concept in performance management. Performance Improvement Journal, Vol.49, No. 1, 25-33.
• Anderson, C., Keltner, D., & John, O.P. (2003). Emotional convergence between people over time. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 1054-1068.
• Barger, P.B., & Grandey, A.A. (2006). Service with a smile and encounter satisfaction: Emotional contagion and appraisal mechanisms. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 1229-1238.
• Bentler, P.M. (1993). EQS structural equation program manual. Los Angeles, CA: BMDP statistical software.
• Borman, W.C., & Motowidlo, S.J. (1993). Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. In N. Schmitt & W.C.Borman (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations, 71-98. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
• Borman, W.C., & Motowidlo, S.J. (1997). Task performance and contextual performance: The meaning for personnel selection research. Human Performance, 10(2), 99-109.
• Browne, M.W.; Cudeck, R., (1989). Single sample cross-validation indices for covariance structures. Multivariate Bihav. Res., 24 (4), 445-455
• Browne, M.W.; Cudeck, R., (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociologic. Meth. Res., 21 (2), 230-258 Burns, T., & Stalker, G. 1961. The management of innovation. London: Tavistock. Campbell, J.P., McCloy, R.A., Oppler, S.H., & Sager, C.E. 1993. A theory of performance. In N. Schmitt, W.C. Borman, and associates (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations: 35-69. San Francisco: JosseyBass. Campbell, J.P., McCloy, R.A., Oppler, S.H., & Sager, C.E. 1993. A theory of performance. In N. Schmitt,Borman.W.C, and associates (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations: 35-69. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
• Chartrand, T.L., & Bargh, J.A. (1999). The chameleon effect: The perception–behavior link and social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 893−910.
• Cochran, William G. (1977). Sampling Techniques (Third ed.). Wiley. ISBN 0-471-16240X.
• Connelly, S., Gaddis, B., & Helton-Fauth, W. (2002). A closer look at the role of emotions in transformational and charismatic leadership. In B.J.Avolio & F.J. Yammarino (Eds.), Transformational and charismatic leadership: The road ahead, Vol. 2, 255-283. Amsterdam: Elsevier. Frese, M., & Fay, D. 2001. Personal initiative: An active performance concept for work in the 21st century. In B.M. Staw & R.L. Sutton (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior, vol. 23: 133-187. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
• Hatfield, E., Cacioppo, J., & Rapson, R.L. (1994). Emotional contagion. New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Hatfield, E., Cacioppo, J.T., & Rapson, R.L. (1992). Primitive emotional contagion. in M.S. Clark (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology, vol. 14, 151−177. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
• Howard, D.J., & Gengler, C. (2001). Emotional contagion effects on product attitudes. Journal of Consumer Research, 28, 189-201.
• Johnson, S.K. (2008). I second that emotion: Effects of emotional contagion and affect at work on leader and follower outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly 19, 1-19 Johnson, J.W.( 2003). Toward a better understanding of the relationship between personality and individual job performance. In M.R. Barrick & A.M. Ryan (Eds.), Personality and work: 83-120. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
• Levy, D.A. & Nail, P.R. (1993). Contagion: A theoretical and empirical review and reconceptualization. Genetic, Social & General Psychology Monographs, 119, 235-285. Loersch, C., Aarts, H., Payne, B.K.,& Jefferis, V.E.The influence of social groups on goal contagion, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology(UNDER PRESS)
• Morrison, E.W., & Phelps, C.C. (1999). Taking charge at work: Extra-role efforts to initiate workplace change. Academy of Management Journal, 42: 403-419.
• Motowidlo, S.J. (2000). Some basic issues related to contextual performance and organizational citizenship behavior in human resource management. Human Resource Management Review, 10, 115−126.
• Motowidlo, S.J. & Van Scotter, J.R. (1994). Evidence that task performance should be distinguished from contextual performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(4), 475-480. Parker, S.K.( 2000). From passive to proactive motivation: The importance of flexible role orientations and role breadth self-efficacy. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 49: 447-469.
• Parker, S.K., Williams, H., M., & Turner, N. (2006). Modeling the antecedents of proactive behavior at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91: 636-652.
• Podsdakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., Paine, J.B., & Bachrach, D.G. (2000). Organizational citizenship behaviors: Critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of Management, 26: 513-563.
• Pugh, S.D. (2001). Service with a smile: Emotional contagion in the service encounter. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 1018-1027.
• Pulakos (Eds.), The changing nature of performance (2007). Griffin, Neal, and Parker 345: Implications for staffing, motivation, an development: 21-55. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
• Pulakos, E.D., Arad, S., Donovan, M.A., & Plamondon, K.E. (2000). Adaptability in the Psychology, 85: 612-624.
• Savell, J.M., Teague, R.C., & Tremble, Jr., T.R. (1995). Job involvement contagion between army squad leaders and their squad members. Military Psychology, 7, 193-206.
• Snodgrass, S.E. (1992). Further effects of role versus gender on interpersonal sensitivity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 154-158.
• Sy, T., Côté, S., & Saavedra, R. (2005). The contagious leader: Impact of the leader’s mood on the mood of group members, group affective tone, and group processes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 295−305.
• Tepper, B.J. & Taylor, E.C. (2003). Relationships among supervisors’ and subordinates’ procedural justice perceptions and organizational citizenship behaviors. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 97-105.
• Welbourne, T.M., Johnson, D.E., & Erez, A. (1998). The role-based performance scale: Validity analysis of a theory-based measure. Academy of Management Journal, 41: 540-555.
• Welbourne, T. & Cable, D. (1995). Group incentives and pay satisfaction: Understanding the relationship through an identity theory perspective. Human Relations, 48(6), 711-726.

Identifiers

DOI

10.15804/tner.2016.45.3.01

Biblioteka Nauki

2004888