Criteria and Indicators of University Education Quality: The Results of Expert Interview

• Authors: Olga V. Bezpalko , Nataliia A. Klishevych , Tetiana L. Liakh , Roman O. Pavliuk

Abstracts

EN

The article is devoted to evaluation of criteria and indicators of the measuring of university education quality. On the basis of an expert interview of the teaching/academic staff of the Institute of Human Sciences of Borys Grinchenko Kyiv University, three main criteria were identified (resourses of educational activities, organization of educational activities, the results of specialist training) and their indicators (the level of teaching/academic staff, students as subjects of education, material base, information and methodological support, technologies of training and education, presentation of educational achievements, competitiveness of graduates at the job market, professional achievements of graduates). The proposed criteria and indicators of the quality of education measuring made it possible to evaluate a methodology of measuring/monitoring of university education quality, which is the innovation of our research. A wheel model, whose rung is a criterion indicator, was included in the basis of the methodology of measuring/monitoring of the quality of education. Each rung is also a separate indicator measuring scale and it is divided into ten conditional labels.

Keywords

EN

quality of education; criteria and indicators of education quality; measuring of education quality; methodology of measuring/monitoring of education quality

• Publisher: Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek
• Journal: The New Educational Review
• Year: 2016
• Volume: 46
• Pages: 61-71

Dates

published

2016

Contributors

author

Olga V. Bezpalko

author

Nataliia A. Klishevych

author

Tetiana L. Liakh

author

Roman O. Pavliuk

References

• Cardoso, S., Rosa, M.J., Stensaker, B. (2016). Why is quality in higher education not achieved? The view of academics. Assessment & evaluation in higher education, 41, Iss.6, 950-965. doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2015.1052775.
• Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory. 2ⁿd edition. Dorchester. The Dorset Press.
• Kaidalova, A.V., Posylkina O.N. (2015). Theoretical and methodological approaches to measuring of quality of education in the context of higher educational establishments rating. Pharmaceutic Bulletin, 4, 75-81. doi: 10.11603/2312-0967.2015.4.5562.
• Ng, P.T. (2015) What is quality education? How can it be achieved? The perspectives of school middle leaders in Singapore. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 27, Iss.4, 307-322. doi:10.1007/s11092-015-9223-8.
• Sarrico, C.S., Alves, A.A. (2016). Academic staff quality in higher education: an empirical analysis of Portuguese public administration education. Higher education, 71, Iss.2, 143-162. doi:10.1007/s10734-015-9893-7.
• Scordoulis, M., Sparanglis, P., Stampolis, O., Mougkolia, I., Papageorgiou, A., Chondreli., C. (2015) A framework for quality in education: applying quality function deployment a higher educational institute. International Scientific Conference “e-RA-10”.
• Sukhova, N.M. (2005). Quality of higher education as one of philosophical basis of transforming of the education in the XXI century: European aspect, available online at: http://www.nbuv.gov.ua/old_jrn/soc_gum/Vnau_f/2009_1/suxov.pdf.
• Teeroovengadum, V., Kamalanabham, T.J., Seebaluck, A.K. (2016). Measuring service quality in higher education. Quality Assurance in Education, 24, Iss.2, 244-258. doi: 10.1108/ QAE-06-2014-0028.
• Yin Cheong Cheng, Wai Ming Tam, (1997). Multimodels of quality in education. Quality assurance in education. 5 Iss:1, 22-31.
• Glaser, B.G. & Strauss, A.L. (2012). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. New Brunswick & London. Aldine Transaction.

Identifiers

DOI

10.15804/tner.2016.46.4.05

Biblioteka Nauki

2004852