Children’s Metaphoric Expressions; The Meaning of Friendship. A Comparative Analysis Between the USA and Poland

• Authors: Anastasia Bristley , Monika Wiśniewska-Kin , Krystyna Nowak-Fabrykowski

Abstracts

EN

The goal of this research project is to analyze children’s understanding of the concept of friendship by investigating symbolic representation in drawing and metaphoric expression in language. This research project is grounded in the conceptual metaphor theory (Lakoff & Johnson, 1980), in which metaphor is defined as a conceptual-linguistic mapping between a source and a target domain. It uses qualitative, ethnographic research based on Spradley’s (1979) theory stating that meanings are derived from symbolically coded concepts where X is a symbol and Y is a referent. The researchers in this study, one from the USA and one from Poland, asked a group of preschool children to draw pictures of their friends. When the children finished their drawings, the researchers asked them 4 questions: “What did you draw?” “Why are they friends?” and “A friend is like…”, “A friendship is like…”. The results demonstrate that preschool children have the cognitive ability to understand the concept of friend and even differentiate between friends and playmates. In the study, the children could determine the number of their real friends, and for most children in both countries, it was 1 or 2 friends. In the group of American children, friendship (X) had two basic meanings (Y): helping (YH) and playing (YP). In Poland, friendship meant playing (YP) and being together after school (YBT). The children in both countries associated friends (target domain) with (source domain) certain people (FP), character quality (FCH), activity (FA) and (FO) object/places. A comparison of the results demonstrates a difference in the number of friends the children claimed to have in Poland versus the USA. Additionally, the research showed that the American children drew only their friends without including themselves, while the Polish children included themselves in their pictures.

Keywords

EN

friendship; metaphoric expressions

• Publisher: Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek
• Journal: The New Educational Review
• Year: 2017
• Volume: 50
• Pages: 56-69

Dates

published

2017

Contributors

author

Anastasia Bristley

author

Monika Wiśniewska-Kin

author

Krystyna Nowak-Fabrykowski

References

• Cameron L., (1996). Discourse context and the development of metaphor in children, Current Issues in Language & Society, 3(1),49-64.
• Cook ].L., & Cook G., (2009). Child Development Principles and Perspectives. Boston: Allyn Bacon.
• Denzin N.K., (2000). Handbook of qualitative research. CA: Palo Alto, Sage.
• Goldman, B. & Buysee, V., (2007). Friendship in the very young age. In Saracho, O.Spodek, B. (2007). Contemporary Perspectives on Socialization and Social Development in Early Childhood Education, University of Maryland: Information Age Publishing.
• Ladd, G., Kochenderfer, B., & Coleman, C., (1996). Friendship Quality as a Predictor of Young Children’s Early School Adjustment, Child Development, 67 (3), 1103-1118.
• Lakoff, G & Johnsen, M., (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Lindsey E.W., (2002). Preschool Children’s Friendships and Peer Acceptance: Links to Social Competence. Child Study ]ournal, 32(3), 145-156.
• Marschark, M., & Nall, L. (1985). Metaphoric competence in cognitive and language development. In H. Reese (ed.) Advances in Child Development and Behaviour. Orlando: FL: Academic Press Inc.
• Piaget I., (1951). The Child’s Conception of the World. London: Littlefield.
• Spradley I., (1979). The Ethnographic Interview. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
• Stites L.]., & Ózcaliskan S., (2013). Teasing Apart the Role of Cognitive and Verbal Factors in Children’s Early Metaphorical Abilities. Metaphor @ Symbol, 28 (2), 116- 129.
• Thien, L.M., Razak, N.A., & Kamil, H. (2012). Friendship Quality Scale: Conceptualization, Development and Validation, School of Educational Studies, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang.
• Van Hoogdalem A.G., Singer E., Eek A., & Heesbeen D., (2013). Friendship in Young Children: Construction of a Behavioural Stoichiometric Method. ]oarnal of Early Childhood Research, 11 (3), p.236-24.
• Vosniadou S., (1987). Children and metaphors. Child Development, 58, 870-85.
• Wierzbicka, A. (2006). English. Meaning and Culture. NY: New York, Oxford University Press.
• Yu S., Ostrosky M.M., Fowler S.A. (2011). Children’s friendship development: A comparative study. Early Childhood Research e? Practice, 13. Retrieved from http://ecrp.uiuc.edu/V13n1/yu.html Google Scholar

Identifiers

DOI

10.15804/tner.2017.50.4.05

Biblioteka Nauki

1997534