Space Exploration Perception and Engagement Intention Among STEM University Students – Results from a Mixed Method Study

• Authors: Joanna Pyrkosz-Pacyna , Katarzyna Cieślak , Marcin K. Zwierżdżyński

Abstracts

EN

Space exploration is currently gaining momentum. This interest is crucial for attracting students to space sciences. We present the results of a qualitative and quantitative study on space exploration perception among university students. Our study showed that participants are interested in space sciences, but their intention to engage in space education is low. Female and male students did not differ in terms of general attitude and interest in space and were equally (not) likely to engage in space education and career. Our findings have practical value for designing interventions to enhance students’ engagement in space education.

Keywords

EN

space exploration perception; engagement intentions; space education; STEM students; mixed methods

• Publisher: Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek
• Journal: The New Educational Review
• Year: 2022
• Volume: 69
• Pages: 191-205

Dates

published

2022

Contributors

author

Joanna Pyrkosz-Pacyna

• AGH University of Science and Technology, Kraków, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000000291128629

author

Katarzyna Cieślak

• AGH University of Science and Technology, Kraków, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000000255394313

author

Marcin K. Zwierżdżyński

• AGH University of Science and Technology, Kraków, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000000342485897

References

• Afful, A. M., Hamilton, M., & Kootsookos, A. (2020). Towards space science education: A study of students’ perceptions of the role and value of a space science program. Acta Astronautica, 167, 351–359. DOI: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2019.11.025
• Ajzen, I. (2002). Constructing a TPB questionnaire: Conceptual and methodological considerations. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.601.956&rep=rep1&-type=pdf
• Alexander, S., & Bannova, O. (2021). University based interdisciplinary space lab: Designing for astronaut health and wellbeing. Acta Astronautica, 186, 382–395. DOI: 10.1016/j. actaastro.2021.05.043
• Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents, 5(1), 307–337.
• Bergstrom, Z., Sadler, P., & Sonnert, G. (2016). Evolution and persistence of students’ astronomy career interests: A gender study. Journal of Astronomy & Earth Sciences Education (JAESE), 3(1), 77–92. DOI: 10.19030/jaese.v3i1.9690
• Cheryan, S., Ziegler, S. A., Montoya, A. K., & Jiang, L. (2017). Why are some STEM fields more gender balanced than others? Psychological Bulletin, 143(1), 1. DOI: 10.1037/ bul0000052
• Diekman, A. B., Brown, E. R., Johnston, A. M., & Clark, E. K. (2010). Seeking congruity between goals and roles: A new look at why women opt out of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics careers. Psychological science, 21(8), 1051–1057.
• (2018). European Space Agency, Europeans and space activities. Harris Interactive. https://esamultimedia.esa.int/docs/corporate/European_and_space_activities_Harris_results.pdf
• Good, C., Rattan, A., & Dweck, C. S. (2012). Why do women opt-out? Sense of belonging and women’s representation in mathematics. Journal of personality and social psychology, 102(4), 700.
• Griffith, A. L. (2010). Persistence of women and minorities in STEM field majors: Is it the school that matters? Economics of Education Review, 29(6), 911–922.
• Hines, R. L. (2022). Heavenly Mandate: Public Opinion and China’s Space Activities. Space Policy, 60, 101460. DOI: 10.1016/j.spacepol.2021.101460
• Launius, R. D. (2003). Public opinion polls and perceptions of US human spaceflight. Space Policy, 19(3), 163–175.
• Marušić, M., & Hadžibegović, Z. (2018). Student attitudes towards astronomy: A bi-country questionnaire results. Revista mexicana de física E, 64(1), 61–69. DOI: 10.31349/ revmexfise.64.61
• Montecalvo, D. R., & Larkin, T. L. (2018). Voices of the Millennial Generation: Connections Between Physics, Scientific Literacy and Attitudes towards Future Space Exploration. In 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.
• Noah, N., & Das, S. (2021). Exploring evolution of augmented and virtual reality education space in 2020 through systematic literature review. Computer Animation and Virtual Worlds, 32(3-4), e2020. DOI: 10.1002/cav.2020
• Ottavianelli, G., & Good, M. (2002). Space education: a step forward. Space Policy, 18(2), 117–127.
• Pell, T., & Jarvis, T. (2001). Developing attitude to science scales for use with children of ages from five to eleven years. International Journal of Science Education, 23(8), 847–862.
• Pew Research Center. (2019, October). Public Expresses Favorable Views of a Number of Federal Agencies. https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2019/10/01/public-expresses-favorable-views-of-a-number-of-federal-agencies/
• Pyrkosz-Pacyna, J., Szastok, M., & Dukała, K. (2019). Men and Women on the STEM track. Similar or diverse. Studia Humanistyczne AGH, 18(4), 31–44. DOI: 10.7494/ human.2019.18.4.31
• Reid, N., & Skryabina, E. A. (2002). Attitudes towards physics. Research in Science & Technological Education, 20(1), 67–81.
• Van Veelen, R., Derks, B., & Endedijk, M. D. (2019). Double trouble: How being outnumbered and negatively stereotyped threatens career outcomes of women in STEM. Frontiers in psychology, 10, 150. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00150

Identifiers

DOI

10.15804/tner.2022.69.3.15

Biblioteka Nauki

2140611