Trust and Personal Innovativeness as the Prerequisites for Using Digital Lending Services Offered by FinTech Lenders

• Authors: Małgorzata Solarz , Jacek Adamek

Abstracts

EN

Theoretical background: Contemporary financial systems have been going through a period of dynamic changes since the beginning of this century. A special role in this process is played by technological innovations, especially the process of digitalization of financial systems, which resulted in the development of FinTech lenders. These entities are active in various segments of the financial services market, including the area of consumer loans (FinTech lenders). The conducted research confirms the dynamic development of FinTech lending activity worldwide and indicates the leading position of Poland among the countries of Central and Eastern Europe in terms of the volume of digital lending. A review of the source literature shows a small number of scientific studies devoted to identifying the reasons underlying the growing interest of consumers in the offer of FinTech lenders. The perceived research gap became the motivation to undertake research addressing this topic in relation to the Polish market of non-banking digital loan services. Purpose of the article: Determining the place and importance of trust and personal innovativeness for consumers’ decisions to use digital loan services offered by FinTech lenders in Poland. Research methods: Critical analysis of the source literature, descriptive and comparative analysis, diagnostic survey as well as simple statistical methods, i.e. analysis of the structure or Kendall’s Tau correlation analysis. The empirical data were collected in May 2022 using the CAWI (computer-assisted web interview) method. The research sample was representative and included 1,000 representatives of Polish population. Main findings: Among the factors determining the adoption decisions of FinTech lenders’ clients, two groups of constructs can be distinguished. The first one consists of classic prerequisites (e.g. perceived ease of use [PEU], perceived usefulness [PU]), identified for a wide range of entities offering financial services based on information technologies. The second group consists of the factors attributed mainly to FinTech lenders, among which the leading position is taken by expressed trust (T) and personal innovativeness (PI). The analyzes carried out in the article confirmed that the expressed trust and personal innovativeness represent the statistically significant factors influencing the decisions made by Poles related to using digital loan services offered by FinTech lenders. The influence of these constructs on the adopted attitudes is a function of their mutual relationship, based on the reciprocal reinforcement of these factors. The conducted research also resulted in developing the economic and demographic profile of a person using the services of FinTech lenders. It is a man, aged 25–34, a university graduate earning an income exceeding PLN 5,000 and residing in a city populated by over 500,000 residents.

Keywords

EN

FinTech; FinTech lenders; FinTech adoption; digital lending

• Publisher: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej
• Journal: Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska, sectio H – Oeconomia
• Year: 2023
• Volume: 57
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 197-218

Dates

published

2023

Contributors

author

Małgorzata Solarz

• Wroclaw University of Economics and Business

• https://orcid.org/0000000195380541

author

Jacek Adamek

• Wroclaw University of Economics and Business

• https://orcid.org/0000000324275052

References

• Abdul-Rahim, R., Bohari, S.A., Aman, A., & Awang, Z. (2022). Benefit-risk perceptions of FinTech adoption for sustainability from bank consumers' perspective: The moderating role of fear of COVID-19. Sustainability, 14(14), 8357. doi:10.3390/su14148357
• Agarwal, R., & Chua, Y.h. (2020). FinTech and household finance: A review of the empirical literature. China Finance Review International, 10(4), 361-376. doi:10.1108/CFRI-03-2020-0024
• Agarwal, R., & Prasad, J. (1998). A conceptual and operational definition of personal innovativeness in the domain of information technology. Information Systems Research, 9(2), 204-215. doi:10.1287/isre.9.2.204
• Ali, M., Raza, S.A., Khamis, B., Puah, C.H., & Amin, H. (2021). How perceived risk, benefit and trust determine user Fintech adoption: A new dimension for Islamic finance. Foresight, 23(4), 403-420. doi:10.1108/FS-09-2020-0095
• Alkhwaldi, A.F., Alharasis, E.E., Shehadeh, M., Abu-Al Sondos, I.A., Oudat, M.S., & Bani Atta, A.A. (2022). Towards an understanding of FinTech users' adoption: Intention and e-loyalty post-COVID-19 from a developing country perspective. Sustainability, 14(14), 12616. doi:10.3390/su141912616
• Aye, T. (2021). Adoption of Fintech and policy recommendations: The case for digital lending platform in Myanmar. Ph.D. thesis. National University of Singapore, Singapore. Retrieved from https://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/192617
• Balcázar, J.J.M., & Rivas, Á.E.L. (2021). Determining factors of the intention to adopt Fintech services by micro and small business owners from Chiclayo, Peru. Journal of Business, Universidad Del Pacífico (Lima, Peru), 13(2), 19-43. doi:10.21678/jb.2021.1650
• Bao, Z., & huang, D. (2021). Shadow banking in a crisis: Evidence from FinTech during COVID-19. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 56(7), 2320-2355. doi:10.1017/S0022109021000430
• Berg, T., Fuster, A., & Puri, M. (2022). Fintech lending. Annual Review of Financial Economics, 14, 187-207. doi:10.1146/annurev-financial-101521-112042
• BIS. (2018). Sound Practices: Implications of fintech developments for banks and bank supervisors. Switzerland: Bank for International Settlements. Retrieved from https://www.bis.org/bcbs/publ/d431.pdf
• Boot, A.W. (2017). The future of banking: From scale & scope economies to Fintech. European Economy, 2, 77-95. Retrieved from https://www.arnoudboot.nl/files/files/Boot%20-%20The%20Future%20of%20Banking%20-%20European%20Economy%202017.pdf
• Bromberg, L., Godwin, A., & Ramsay, I. (2017). Fintech sandboxes: Achieving a balance between regulation and innovation. Journal of Banking and Finance Law and Practice, 28(4), 314-336. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=3090844
• Chan, R., Troshani, I., Hill, S.R., & hoffmann, A. (2022). Towards an understanding of consumers' FinTech adoption: The case of open banking. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 40(4), 886-917. doi:10.1108/IJBM-08-2021-0397
• Chang, M.K., Cheung, W., & Lai, V.S. (2005). Literature derived reference models for the adoption of online shopping. Information & Management, 42(4), 543-559. doi:10.1016/j.im.2004.02.006
• Chiu, I.h. (2017). A new era in fintech payment innovations? A perspective from the institutions and regulation of payment systems. Law, Innovation and Technology, 9(2), 190-234. doi:10.1080/17579961.2017.1377912
• Contreras Pinochet, L.h., Diogo, G.T., Lopes, E.L., Herrero, E., & Bueno, R.L.P. (2019). Propensity of contracting loans services from FinTech's in Brazil. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 37(5), 1190-1214. doi:10.1108/IJBM-07-2018-0174
• Credit Reporting Agency. (2022). Market analyses. Retrieved from https://media.bik.pl/analizy-rynkowe
• Di Maggio, M., & Yao, V. (2021). Fintech borrowers: Lax screening or cream-skimming? The Review of Financial Studies, 34(10), 4565-4618. doi:10.1093/rfs/hhaa142
• Diana, N., & Leon, F.M. (2020). Factors affecting continuance intention of FinTech payment among Millennials in Jakarta. European Journal of Business and Management Research, 5(4), 1-8. doi:10.24018/ejbmr.2020.5.4.444
• European Bank Authority. (2022). Final Report on response to the non-bank lending request from the CFA on digital finance. Retrieved from https://www.eba.europa.eu/eba-provides-its-advice-eu-commission-non-bank-lending
• Gołąb, P., & Monkiewicz, J. (2020). Finanse alternatywne i cyfrowe: w poszukiwaniu ram analitycznych. Kwartalnik Nauk o Przedsiębiorstwie, 56(3), 27-41. doi:10.33119/KNoP.2020.56.3.2
• Gomber, P., Koch, J.A., & Siering, M. (2017). Digital finance and FinTech: Current research and future research directions. Journal of Business Economics, 87(5), 537-580. doi:10.1007/s11573-017-0852-x
• hamarat, Ç., & Broby, D. (2022). Regulatory constraint and small business lending: do innovative peer-topeer lenders have an advantage? Financial Innovation, 8(1), 1-25. doi:10.1186/s40854-022-00377-y
• hasan, R., Ashfaq, M., & Shao, L. (2021). Evaluating drivers of Fintech adoption in the Netherlands. Global Business Review, 0(0). doi:10.1177/09721509211027402
• hu, Z., Ding, S., Li, S., Chen, L., & Yang, S. (2019). Adoption intention of fintech services for bank users: An empirical examination with an extended technology acceptance model. Symmetry, 11(3), 340. doi:10.3390/sym11030340
• Jackson, J.D., Mun, Y.Y., & Park, J.S. (2013). An empirical test of three mediation models for the relationship between personal innovativeness and user acceptance of technology. Information & Management, 50(4), 154-161. doi:10.1016/j.im.2013.02.006
• Kaczmarczyk, S. (2018). Zalety i wady metod zbierania danych przez internet w badaniach marketingowych, Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Śląskiej, seria Organizacja i Zarządzanie, 129, 187-200. doi:10.29119/1641-3466.2018.129.13
• Khan, M.T.I., Yee, G.h., & Gan, G.G.G. (2021). Antecedents of intention to use online peer-to-peer platform in Malaysia. Vision, 0(0). doi:10.1177/09722629211039051
• Kułak, J.P., Trojanowski, M., & Barmentloo, E. (2019). A literature review of the partial unified theory of acceptance and use of technology 2 (UTAUT2) model. Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska, sectio H - Oeconomia, 53(4), 101-113. doi:10.17951/h.2019.53.4.101-113
• Lee, I., & Shin, Y.J. (2018). Fintech: Ecosystem, business models, investment decisions, and challenges. Business Horizons, 61(1), 35-46. doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2017.09.003
• Liébana-Cabanillas, F., Marinkovic, V., de Luna, I.R., & Kalinic, Z. (2018). Predicting the determinants of mobile payment acceptance: A hybrid SEM-neural network approach. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 129(C), 117-130. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2017.12.015
• Mayer, R.C., Davis, J.h., & Schoorman, F.D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709-734. doi:10.5465/amr.1995.9508080335
• Meyliana, M., & Fernando, E. (2019). The inuflence of perceived risk and trust in adoption of nfitech services in Indonesia. Communication and Information Technology Journal, 13(1), 31-37. doi:10.21512/commit.v13i1.5708
• Mullan, J., Bradley, L., & Loane, S. (2017). Bank adoption of mobile banking: stakeholder perspective. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 35(7), 1154-1174. doi:10.1108/IJBM-09-2015-0145
• Murinde, V., Rizopoulos, E., & Zachariadis, M. (2022). The impact of the FinTech revolution on the future of banking: Opportunities and risks. International Review of Financial Analysis, 81(C), 102103. doi:10.1016/j.irfa.2022.102103
• Nangin, M.A., Barus, I.R.G., & Wahyoedi, S. (2020). The effects of perceived ease of use, security, and promotion on trust and its implications on fintech adoption. Journal of Consumer Sciences, 5(2), 124-138. doi:10.29244/jcs.5.2.124-138
• Nathan, R.J., Setiawan, B., & quynh, M.N. (2022). Fintech and financial health in Vietnam during the COVID-19 pandemic: In-depth descriptive analysis. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 15(3), 125. doi:10.3390/jrfm15030125
• Navaretti, G.B., Calzolari, G., Mansilla-Fernandez, J.M., & Pozzolo, A.F. (2018). Fintech and banking. Friends or foes? Friends or Foes. doi:10.2139/ssrn.3099337
• Pavlou, P.A. (2003). Consumer acceptance of electronic commerce: Integrating trust and risk with the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 7(3), 101-134. doi:10.1080/10864415.2003.11044275
• Pavlou, P.A., & Gefen, D. (2004). Building effective online marketplaces with institution-based trust. Information Systems Research, 15(1), 37-59. doi:10.1287/isre.1040.0015
• Phuong, N.T.h., Thuy, N.D., Giang, T.L., han, B.T.N., hieu, T.h., & Long, N.T. (2022). Determinants of intention to use Fintech payment services: Evidence from Vietnam generation Z. International Journal of Business, Economics and Law, 26(1), 354-366. Retrieved from https://www.ijbel.com/wp-content/ uploads/2022/06/IJBEL26.ISU1_301.pdf
• Polish Lendtech Map. (2021). LendTech Foundation. Retrieved from https://www.lendtech.pl/projekty-fundacji/polska-mapa-lendtech-2021/
• Putranto, B.D., & Sobari, N. (2021). Predicting intention of using Fintech lending to bank users in Indonesia. In 18th International Symposium on Management (INSYMA 2021). Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research, 180, 206-211. doi:10.2991/aebmr.k.210628.034
• Rempel, J.K., holmes, J.G., & Zanna, M.P. (1985). Trust in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(1), 95-112. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.49.1.95
• Rogers, E.M. (1995). Diffusion of Innovations (4th ed.). New York: The Free Press.
• Ryu, h.S. (2018). What makes users willing or hesitant to use Fintech? The moderating effect of user type. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 118(3), 541-569. doi:10.1108/IMDS-07-2017-0325
• Setiawan, B., Nugraha, D.P., Irawan, A., Nathan, R.J., & Zoltan, Z. (2021). User innovativeness and Fintech adoption in Indonesia. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(3), 188. doi:10.3390/joitmc7030188
• Shaikh, A.A., & Karjaluoto, h. (2015). Mobile banking adoption: A literature review. Telematics and Informatics, 32(1), 129-142. doi:10.1016/j.tele.2014.05.003
• Shankar, A., & Datta, B. (2018). Factors affecting mobile payment adoption intention: An Indian perspective. Global Business Review, 19(3), 72-89. doi:10.1177/0972150918757870
• Singh, S., Sahni, M.M., & Kovid, R.K. (2020). What drives FinTech adoption? A multi-method evaluation using an adapted technology acceptance model. Management Decision, 58(8), 1675-1697. doi:10.1108/MD-09-2019-1318
• Slazus, B.J. (2022). Factors that influence FinTech adoption in South Africa: A study of consumer behavior towards branchless mobile banking. Athens Journal of Business & Economics, 8(1), 43-64. doi:10.30958/ajbe.8-1-3
• Solarz, M., & Adamek, J. (2021). Factors affecting mobile banking adoption in Poland: An empirical study. European Research Studies Journal, 24, 1018-1046. doi:10.35808/ersj/2648
• Soleimani, M. (2022). Buyers' trust and mistrust in e-commerce platforms: A synthesizing literature review. Information Systems and e-Business Management, 20, 57-78. doi:10.1007/s10257-021-00545-0
• Souiden, N., Ladhari, R., & Chaouali, W. (2021). Mobile banking adoption: A systematic review. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 39(2), 214-241. doi:10.1108/IJBM-04-2020-0182
• Statistics Poland. (2022). Activity of credit intermediation companies in 2021. Retrieved from https://stat. gov.pl/obszary-tematyczne/podmioty-gospodarcze-wyniki-finansowe/przedsiebiorstwa-finansowe/dzialalnosc-przedsiebiorstw-posrednictwa-kredytowego-w-2021-roku,1,16.html
• Stewart, h., & Jürjens, J. (2018). Data security and consumer trust in FinTech innovation in Germany. Information & Computer Security, 26(1), 109-128. doi:10.1108/ICS-06-2017-0039
• Suh, B., & han, I. (2002). Effect of trust on customer acceptance of Internet banking. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 1(3-4), 247-263. doi:10.1016/S1567-4223(02)00017-0
• Sunardi, R., hamidah, h., Buchdadi, A.D., & Purwana, D. (2022). Factors determining adoption of Fintech peer-to-peer lending platform: An empirical study in Indonesia. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 9(1), 43-51. doi:10.13106/JAFEB.2022.VOL9.NO1.0043
• Tang, h. (2019). Peer-to-peer lenders versus banks: Substitutes or complements? The Review of Financial Studies, 32(5), 1900-1938. doi:10.1093/rfs/hhy137
• Tapanainen, T. (2020). Toward Fintech adoption framework for developing countries - a literature review based on the stakeholder perspective. Journal of Information Technology Applications and Management, 27(5), 1-22. doi:10.21219/jitam.2020.27.5.001
• Tiwari, P., Tiwari, S.K., & Gupta, A. (2021). Examining the impact of customers' awareness, risk and trust in m-banking adoption. FIIB Business Review, 10(4), 413-423. doi:10.1177/23197145211019924
• Tsai, C.h., & Kuan-Jung, P. (2017). The FinTech revolution and financial regulation: The case of online supply-chain financing. Asian Journal of Law and Society, 4(1), 109-132. doi:10.1017/als.2016.65
• Tun-Pin, C., Keng-Soon, W.C., Yen-San, Y., Pui-Yee, C., Hong-Leong, J.T., & Shwu-Shing, N. (2019). An adoption of fintech service in Malaysia. South East Asia Journal of Contemporary Business, 18(5), 134-147. http://seajbel.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/seajbel5-VOL18_241.pdf
• Xia, h., Lu, D., Lin, B., Nord, J.h., & Zhang, J.Z. (2022). Trust in Fintech: Risk, governance, and continuance intention. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 1-15. doi:10.1080/08874417.2022.2093295
• Xie, J., Ye, L., huang, W., & Ye, M. (2021). Understanding FinTech platform adoption: impacts of perceived value and perceived risk. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 16(5), 1893-1911. doi:10.3390/jtaer16050106
• Yang, K. (2021). Trust as an entry barrier: Evidence from FinTech adoption. doi:10.2139/ssrn.3761468
• Zalan, T., & Toufaily, E. (2017). The promise of fintech in emerging markets: Not as disruptive. Contemporary Economics, 11(4), 415-431. Retrieved from https://www.econstor.eu/bitstre am/10419/195501/1/1029213224.pdf
• Zetzsche, D.A., Arner, D.W., Buckley, R.P., & Kaiser-Yücel, A. (2020). Fintech toolkit: Smart regulatory and market approaches to financial technology innovation. University of Hong Kong Faculty of Law Research Paper, 27. doi:10.2139/ssrn.3598142

Identifiers

DOI

10.17951/h.2023.57.1.197-218

Biblioteka Nauki

16729057