Czy monady mają części? Witkiewicz i jego krytyka mereologii jako ontologii

• Authors: Artur Szachniewicz

Title variants

EN

Have Monads Any Parts? Witkiewicz on Mereology as Ontology

Abstracts

EN

This paper reconstructs Stanisław Ignacy Witkiewicz’s understanding of logic, accentuating the differences in his evaluation of logic and systems of ‘logistics’. Leśniewski’s theory of collective sets (mereology) exemplifies logistics as understood by Witkiewicz. I present an outline of Leśniewski’s nominalism, which entails a belief in a non-abstract nature of sets. I focus on these features of mereology that could have led Witkiewicz to interpreting it as an ontological system. Witkacy (Witkiewicz’s penname) was skeptical of the usefulness of formal systems (or logistics), and of mereology in particular, for the purposes of designing a unified ontological system describing essential properties of objects (the world). According to Witkiewicz, such formal systems assumed the role of ontology but severely lacked in philosophical justification. I argue that regardless of his nominalism and corporeal conception of individuals, mereology cannot be considered a formal theory of Witkiewicz’s monads.

Keywords

EN

Witkiewicz; Leśniewski; mereology; monads; ontology

• Publisher: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego
• Journal: Analiza i Egzystencja. Czasopismo Filozoficzne
• Year: 2017
• Volume: 37
• Pages: 79-99

Contributors

author

Artur Szachniewicz

• Zakład Ontologii, Instytut Filozofii, UJ

Identifiers

DOI

10.18276/aie.2017.37-05

Biblioteka Nauki

1621979