Analysis of Potential Educational Areas of Pokémon Go! Game Use Based on Mini FGI Method

• Authors: Magdalena Butkiewicz , Mateusz Kot

Title variants

PL

Analiza obszarów potencjalnego wykorzystania edukacyjnego „Pokemon Go!” Na podstawie mini FGI

Abstracts

PL

W niniejszym tekście skupiono się na próbie określenia edukacyjnego charakteru aplikacji „Pokemon Go!” na podstawie interakcji użytkowników z elementami przestrzeni wirtualnej i rzeczywistej. W tym celu zdecydowano się na przeprowadzenie wywiadów z graczami w minigrupach fokusowych (mini FGI). Zapytano ich o interakcję z rzeczywistymi obiektami odzwierciedlonymi w grze, samodzielne poszukiwanie informacji o odwiedzanych lokalizacjach oraz tworzenie treści edukacyjnych w przestrzeni gry. Graczy zapytano także o ich pomysły na zwiększenie możliwości edukacyjnych „Pokemon Go!”, ponieważ uznano, że warto wykazać opinię użytkowników praktycznie wykorzystujących grę. Na podstawie pozyskanych wyników – po pierwsze – wskazano obszary mogące posiadać potencjał edukacyjny, ale wymagające poprawy, a po drugie – sformułowano propozycje mające na celu zwiększenie możliwości edukacyjnych gry.

EN

This article attempts to determine the educational nature of “Pokémon Go!” game based on user interactions with virtual space and real-life elements. For this purpose, interviews with players in mini focus groups (mini FGI) were the chosen method. Respondents were asked about their interaction with actual objects that are reflected in the game, how they search for information about the locations themselves, and about the educational content in the game space. The players were also asked for their ideas on how to enhance the educational potential of the game, as such opinion of real-life players was deemed notable. Based on the results obtained, firstly, areas of potential educational value that still need to be improved were identified and, secondly, recommendations were formulated how to enhance the educational opportunities arising from the game.

Keywords

EN

education; mobile games; mini FGI; media education; Pokémon Go

PL

edukacja; gry mobilne; mini FGI; edukacja medialna; Pokemon Go

• Publisher: Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
• Journal: Roczniki Nauk Społecznych
• Year: 2023
• Volume: 51
• Issue: 3
• Pages: 33-50

Dates

published

2023

Contributors

author

Magdalena Butkiewicz

• Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw, Faculty of Theology

• https://orcid.org/0000000286926060

author

Mateusz Kot

• Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw, Faculty of Theology

• https://orcid.org/0000000199338420

References

• Alavesa P., & Xu Y. (2022), Unblurring the boundary between daily life and gameplay in location-based mobile games, visual online ethnography on Pokémon GO, Behaviour & Information Technology, no. 41(1), p. 215-227; doi: 10.1080/0144929X.2020.1825810.
• Althoff T., White R.W., & Horvitz E. (2016), Influence of Pokémon Go on Physical Activity: Study and Implications, Journal of Medical Internet Research, no. 18(12), e 315; doi: 10.2196/jmir.6759.
• Ariza A.R., Serrano S.L., Manzano S.S., & López E.J.M. (2018), Videojuegos activos y cognición. Propuestas educativas en adolescentes, RIED-Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, no. 21(2), p. 285-303; doi: 10.5944/ried.21.2.19799.
• Bruno L.E. (2019), Get Gamified: Promoting Augmented Reality and Digital Game Technology in Education, [in:] V. Geroimenko (ed.), Augmented Reality Games I: Understanding the Pokémon GO Phenomenon, Cham: Springer International Publishing, p. 237-251; doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-15616-9_15.
• Cacchione A. (2019), Pokémon GO Between Incidental Learning and Frame Analysis: It’s the End of the World as We Know It, [in:] V. Geroimenko (ed.), Augmented Reality Games I: Understanding the Pokémon GO Phenomenon, Cham: Springer International Publishing, p. 203-215; doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-15616-9_13.
• Colley A., Thebault-Spieker J., Lin A.Y., Degraen D., Fischman B., Häkkilä J., and Wenig N. (2017), The geography of Pokémon GO: Beneficial and problematic effects on places and movement, [in:] Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, New York: Association for Computing Machinery, p. 1179-1192; doi: 10.1145/3025453.3025495.
• Comunello F., Mulargia S. (2017), My Grandpa and I “Gotta Catch ‘Em All.” A Research Design on Intergenerational Gaming Focusing on Pokémon Go, [in:] J. Zhou, G. Salvendy (eds.), Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population. Applications, Services and Contexts. ITAP 2017, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 10298; doi:10.1007/978-3-319-58536-9_19.
• Deslis D., Kosmidis CV., and Tenta E. (2019), Using a Non-educational Mobile Game for Learning in Biology, Geography and Mathematics: Pokémon Go as a Case Study, [in:] M. Tsitouridou, A.J. Diniz, and T.A. Mikropoulos (eds.), Technology and Innovation in Learning, Teaching and Education, TECH-EDU 2018 (Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol. 993), Cham: Springer; doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-20954-4_29.
• Gill P., Stewart K., Treasure E., & Chadwick B. (2008), Methods of data collection in qualitative research: interviews and focus groups, British Dental Journal, 204(6), p. 291-295; doi: 10.1038/ bdj.2008.192.
• Graells-Garrido E., Ferres L., Caro D., & Bravo L. (2017), The effect of Pokémon Go on the pulse of the city: a natural experiment, EPJ Data Science, 6, no. 23, p. 1-19; doi: 10.1140/epjds/s13688-017-0119-3.
• Harborth D., & Pape S. (2020), How nostalgic feelings impact Pokémon Go players – integrating childhood brand nostalgia into the technology acceptance theory, Behaviour & Information Technology, no. 39(12), p. 1276-1296; doi: 10.1080/0144929X.2019.1662486.
• Joseph B., & Armstrong D.G. (2016), Potential perils of peri-Pokémon perambulation: The dark reality of augmented reality?, Oxford Medical Case Reports, 2016(10), omw080.
• Kamboj A.K., & Krishna S.G. (2017), Pokémon GO: An innovative smartphone gaming application with health benefits, Primary Care Diabetes, 11(4), p. 397-399; doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2017.03.008.
• Kot M. (2021a), Educational Value of Mobile Games Using Augmented Reality in Urban space – Participatory Observation of the “Pokemon Go!”, Media Education, no. 17(1), p. 86-92; doi: 10.13187/me.2021.1.86.
• Kot M. (2021b), Edukacja medialna a emocje związane z budowaniem długotrwałego potencjału komercyjnego treści na przykładzie produktów związanych z uniwersum Pokemon, [in:] M. Butkiewicz and G. Łęcicki (eds.), Emocje w Filmie, Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego, p. 189-202.
• Laato S., Pietarinen T., Rauti S., & Laine T.H. (2019), Analysis of the Quality of Points of Interest in the Most Popular Location-based Games, [in:] Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Computer Systems and Technologies, New York: Association for Computing Machinery, p. 153-160; doi: 10.1145/3345252.3345286.
• Laine T.H. (2018), Mobile Educational Augmented Reality Games: A Systematic Literature Review and Two Case Studies, Computers, no. 7(1), e19; doi: 10.3390/computers7010019.
• Lee J., Lee H.-K., Jeong D., Lee J., Kim T., & Lee J. (2021), Developing Museum Education Content: AR Blended Learning, International Journal of Art & Design Education, p. 473-491; doi: 10.1111/jade.12352.
• Lin P.-C., Lu H.-K., Lin Y.-H., & Tsang W.-H. (2017), A Study of a Mobile Game on the Interrelationships of Technology Acceptance, Interpersonal Relation, Sense of Direction, and Information Literacy – A Case of Pokémon GO, International Journal of Information and Education Technology, no. 7(12), p. 942-947; doi: 10.18178/ijiet.2017.7.12.1000.
• Lisek-Michalska J. (2013), Badania fokusowe. Problemy metodologiczne i etyczne, Łodź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.
• Łobocki M. (2009), Metody i techniki badań pedagogicznych, Kraków: Oficyna Wydawnicza “Impuls”.
• Malik A., Hiekkanen K., Hussain Z., Hamari J., & Johri A. (2020), How players across gender and age experience Pokémon Go?, Universal Access in the Information Society, no. 19(4), p. 799-812; doi: 10.1007/s10209-019-00694-7.
• Morgan D.L. (1999), The focus group guidebook, Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
• Mozelius P., Jaldemark J., & Hellerstedt A. (2020), Aristotle, Comenius, Dewey, Plato and Pokémon GO: Walking with Location-based Games in the Footsteps of Didactic Giants, [in:] Fifteenth European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning, Heidelberg, Germany: CEUR-WS.
• O’Connor H., & Madge C. (2003), “Focus groups in cyberspace”: Using the Internet for qualitative research, Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, no. 6(2), p. 133-143; doi: 10.1108/13522750310470190.
• Oliveira P.R.B. (2017), Pokémon GO: Discutindo Dispositivos e a pedagogia dos jogos eletrônicos, Texto Livre: Linguagem e Tecnologia, no. 10(2), p. 50-65; doi: 10.17851/1983-3652.10.2.50-65.
• Paasovaara S., Jarusriboonchai P., & Olsson T. (2017), Understanding collocated social interaction between Pokémon GO players, [in:] Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia, New York: Association for Computing Machinery, p. 151-163; doi: 10.1145/3152832.3152854.
• Paavilainen J., Korhonen H., Alha K., Stenros J., Koskinen E., & Mayra F. (2017), The Pokémon GO Experience: A Location-Based Augmented Reality Mobile Game Goes Mainstream, [in:] Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, New York: Association for Computing Machinery, p. 2493-2498; doi: 10.1145/3025453.3025871.
• Pombo L., & Marques M. (2020), The Potential Educational Value of Mobile Augmented Reality Games: The Case of EduPARK App., Education Sciences, no. 10, p. 1-20; doi: 10.3390/educsci10100287.
• Ponte C., & Aroldi P. (2013), Connecting generations. A research and learning approach for media education and audience studies, Comunicar. Media Education Research Journal, no. 21(41), p. 167-176; doi: 10.3916/C41-2013-16.
• Rauschnabel P.A., Rossmann A., & tom Dieck M.C. (2017), An adoption framework for mobile augmented reality games: The case of Pokémon Go, Computers in Human Behavior, no. 76, p. 276-286; doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.07.030.
• Remmer M., Denami M., & Marquet P. (2017), Why Pokémon GO is the future of school education. Effects of AR on intrinsic motivation of children at elementary school, [in:] Proceedings of the Virtual Reality International Conference – Laval Virtual 2017, New York: Association for Computing Machinery, p. 1-5.
• Shea R., Fu D., Sun A., Cai C., Ma X., Fan X., Gong W., and Liu J. (2017), Location-Based Augmented Reality With Pervasive Smartphone Sensors: Inside and Beyond Pokemon Go!, IEEE Access, no. 5, p. 9619-9631; doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2696953.
• Silvia H., & Carr N.K. (2020), When Worlds Collide: Protecting Physical World Interests Against Virtual World Malfeasance, Michigan Telecommunications and Technology Law Review, no. 26, p. 279-315.
• Szlachta Junior A.M., & Ramos M.E.T. (2019), Possibilidades para a educação patrimonial por meio de games de realidade aumentada, Métis História e Cultura, no. 18(35), p. 97-120; doi: 10.18226/22362762.v18.n.35.05.
• Thelwall M., & Nevill T. (2021), Is research with qualitative data more prevalent and impactful now? Interviews, case studies, focus groups and ethnographies, Library & Information Science Research, no. 43(2); doi: 10.1016/j.lisr.2021.101094.
• Thongmak M. (2020), Determinants of intention to play Pokémon Go, Heliyon, no. 6(12); doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03895.
• Tran K.M. (2018a), Families, resources, and learning around Pokémon Go, E-Learning and Digital Media, no. 15(3), p. 113-127; doi: 10.1177/2042753018761166.
• Tran K.M. (2018b), Distributed Teaching and Learning in Pokémon Go (dissertation, Arizona State University), Arizona State University. Retrieved from https://keep.lib.asu.edu/_flysystem/ fedora/c7/194824/Tran_asu_0010E_17749.pdf.
• Vella K., Johnson D., Cheng V.W.S., Davenport T., Mitchell J., Klarkowski M., & Phillips C. (2019), A Sense of Belonging: Pokémon GO and Social Connectedness, Games and Culture, 14(6), p. 583-603; doi: 10.1177/1555412017719973.
• Wang A.I., & Skjervold A. (2021), Health and social impacts of playing Pokémon Go on various player groups, Entertainment Computing, no. 39; doi: 10.1016/j.entcom.2021.100443.
• Wimmer R.D., & Dominick J.R. (2008), Mass media: Metody badań, Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.
• Wong F.Y. (2017), Influence of Pokémon Go on physical activity levels of university players: A cross-sectional study, International Journal of Health Geographics, no. 16(1), p. 1-12; doi: 10.1186/s12942-017-0080-1.
• Woods O. (2021), Experiencing the unfamiliar through mobile gameplay: Pokémon go as augmented tourism, Area, no. 53(1), p. 183-190; doi: 10.1111/area.12633.
• Wu M.-H. (2019), The applications and effects of learning English through augmented reality: A case study of Pokémon Go, Computer Assisted Language Learning, p. 1-35; doi: 10.1080/09588221.2019.1642211.
• Yan Z., Finn K., & Breton K. (2020), Does it Promote Physical Activity? College Students’ Perceptions of Pokémon Go, Montenegrin Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, no. 9(1), p. 5-10; doi: 10.26773/mjssm.200301.
• Zhang Y., & Zhang J. (2018), Could Nearby Pokéstops Improve Restaurants’ Online Reputation?, [in:] Proceedings of the 51st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. AIS Electronic Library.
• Zhao B., & Zhang S. (2019), Rethinking Spatial Data Quality: Pokémon Go as a Case Study of Location Spoofing, The Professional Geographer, no. 71(1), p. 96-108; doi: 10.1080/00330124.2018.1479973.
• Zsila Á., Orosz G., Bőthe B., Tóth-Király I., Király O., Griffiths M., & Demetrovics Z. (2018), An empirical study on the motivations underlying augmented reality games: The case of Pokémon Go during and after Pokémon fever, Personality and Individual Differences, no. 133, p. 56-66; doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2017.06.024.

Identifiers

DOI

10.18290/rns2023.0027

Biblioteka Nauki

30147109