Person–Supervisor Fit and Proactive Behavior and Unethical Behaviors

• Authors: Tomasz Korulczyk , Helena D. Cooper-Thomas

Title variants

PL

English

• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

This study examined how person–supervisor fit is related to employees’ proactive behavior and unethical behavior towards the organization. The study involved 321 employees representing various sectors in Poland. The participants completed the Person–Supervisor Fit Scale, Proactive Behavior Scale, and the Unethical Behavior Questionnaire. Results show that a supplementary fit is weakly and positively related to proactive behavior but is not related to complementary fit. Surprisingly, supplementary fit is weakly but positively related to unethical behavior, while complementary fit from a needs–resources perspective is weakly and negatively associated with unethical behavior. Conclusions may be applied to organizational settings challenged by the problem of employee unethical behavior and their low proactivity in the context of person–supervisor congruence.

Keywords

EN

person-supervisor fit; supplementary fit; complementary fit; unethical behaviour; proactive behaviour

• Publisher: Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II. Towarzystwo Naukowe KUL
• Journal: Roczniki Psychologiczne
• Year: 2020
• Volume: 23
• Issue: 3
• Pages: 247-266

Dates

published

2021-02-16

Contributors

author

Tomasz Korulczyk

• The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin

• https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5182-5702

author

Helena D. Cooper-Thomas

• Auckland University of Technology

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4080-9704

References

• Aguinis, H., Gottfredson, R. K., & Joo, H. (2013). Best-practice recommendations for defining, identifying, and handling outliers. Organizational Research Methods, 16(2), 270–301. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428112470848
• Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/0e84/1ed289a3cf9b9a799da4b344bd9397542c2e.pdf
• Andreoli, N., & Lefkowitz, J. (2009). Individual and organizational antecedents of misconduct in organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 85(3), 309.
• Ashford, S. J., & Black, J. S. (1996). Proactivity during organizational entry: The role of desire for control. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(2), 199–214.
• Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The job demands-resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(3), 309–328. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940710733115
• Bateman, T. S., & Crant, J. M. (1993). The proactive component of organizational behavior: A measure and correlates. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14(2), 103–118. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030140202
• Brudek, P., Korulczyk, T., & Korulczyk, N. (2018). Spouses’ fit and Marriage Satisfaction in Late Adulthood. Roczniki Psychologiczne, 21(1), 69–85. https://doi.org/10.18290/rpsych.2018.21.1-5
• Burke, S. E. (2009). Proactive Socialisation: A longitudinal investigation of newcomer adjustment inside both an institutionalised and individualised workplace (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington.
• Byrne, D. E. (1971). The attraction paradigm (Vol. 11). Academic Press.
• Cable, D. M., & Judge, T. A. (1996). Person–organization fit, job choice decisions, and organizational entry. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67(3), 294–311.
• Caplan, R. D. (1987). Person–environment fit theory and organizations: Commensurate dimensions, time perspectives, and mechanisms. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 31, 248–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-8791(87)90042-X
• Crant, J. M. (2000). Proactive behavior in organizations. Journal of Management, 26(3), 435–462. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630002600304
• Czerw, A., & Czarnota-Bojarska, J. (2016). Dopasowanie człowiek-środowisko i postawa wobec pracy jako motywatory zachowań organizacyjnych [Person–environment fit and attitude to work as motivators of organizational behavior]. Psychologia społeczna, 1, 8–19.
• Dalal, R. S. (2005). A meta-analysis of the relationship between organizational citizenship behavior and counterproductive work behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6), 1241–1255.
• De Coninck, J. B. (1992). How sales managers control unethical sales force behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 11(10), 789–798. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00872311
• Edwards, J. R. (1991). Person–job fit: A conceptual integration, literature review, and methodological critique. In C. Cooper (Ed.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 283–357). John Wiley & Sons.
• Edwards, J. R., Caplan, R. D., & Harrison, R. V. (1998). Person–environment fit theory: Conceptual foundations, empirical evidence, and directions for future research. In C. L. Cooper (Ed.), Theories of organizational stress (pp. 28–67). Oxford University Press.
• Endler, N. S., & Magnusson, D. (1976). Toward an interactional psychology of personality. Psychological Bulletin, 83(5), 956–974.
• Ferrell, O. C., & Gresham, L. G. (1985). A contingency framework for understanding ethical decision making in marketing. Journal of Marketing, 49(3), 87–96. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251618
• Frese, M., & Fay, D. (2001). Personal initiative: An active performance concept. Research in Organizational Behavior, 23, 133–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-3085(01)23005-6
• Hakanen, J. J., Schaufeli, W. B., & Ahola, K. (2008). The job demands–resources model: A three-year cross-lagged study of burnout, depression, commitment, and work engagement. Work & Stress, 22(3), 224–241.
• Hammond, M. M., Neff, N. L., Farr, J. L., Schwall, A. R., & Zhao, X. (2011). Predictors of individual-level innovation at work: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5(1), 90–105.
• Hunt, S. D., & Vitell, S. (1986). A General Theory of Marketing Ethics. Journal of Macromarketing, 6(1), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/027614678600600103
• Karassavidou, E., & Glaveli, N. (2006). Towards the ethical or the unethical side? An explorative research of Greek business students’ attitudes. International Journal of Educational Management, 20(5), 348–364.
• Kim, T. Y., & Kim, M. (2013). Leaders’ moral competence and employee outcomes: The effects of psychological empowerment and person–supervisor fit. Journal of Business Ethics, 112(1), 155–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1238-1
• Korulczyk, T. (2016). Dopasowanie w relacji przełożony-podwładny, retencja i wydajność pracy [Supervisor–subordinate fit, retention, and job performance] (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
• Korulczyk, T., & Korulczyk, N. (2018). The role of fit theories in job analysis. In A. Biela (Ed.), European Questionnaire for Job Analysis (EQJA): Theoretical and methodological bases (pp. 65–85). Peter Lang.
• Kristof-Brown, A. L., & Billsberry, J. (2013). Organizational fit: Key issues and new directions. John Wiley & Sons.
• Kristof-Brown, A. L., Zimmerman, R. D., & Johnson, E. C. (2005). Consequences of individuals’ fit at work: A meta-analysis of person–job, person–organization, person–group, and person–supervisor fit. Personnel Psychology, 58(2), 281–342. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00672.x
• Kristof, A. L. (1996). Person–organization fit: An integrative review of its conceptualizations, measurement, and implications. Personnel Psychology, 49(1), 1–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1996.tb01790.x
• Laszlo, E. (1996). The Systems View of the World: The Natural Philosophy of the New Developments in Science (2nd ed.). Retrieved November 16, 2019, from http://search.proquest.com/openview/d373481c1e03d1111dac1876243426ce/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=1817765
• Lewin, K., Adams, D. K., & Zener, K. E. (1935). A dynamic theory of personality. McGraw-Hill.
• Llorens, S., Bakker, A. B., Schaufeli, W., & Salanova, M. (2006). Testing the robustness of the job demands–resources model. International Journal of Stress Management, 13(3), 378–391. doi:10.1037/1072-5245.13.3.378
• Locke, E. A. (1976). The nature and causes of job satisfaction. In M. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 1297–1350). Rand McNally.
• McNeill, S. (2019). The cost of unethical behavior. Retrieved November 17, 2019, from https://assets.corporatecompliance.org/Portals/1/PDF/Resources/ethikos/past-issues/2014/scce-2014-03-ethikos-mcneill.pdf
• Meglino, B. M., & Ravlin, E. C. (1998). Individual values in organizations: Concepts, controversies, and research. Journal of Management, 24(3), 351–389.
• Oh, I. S., Guay, R. P., Kim, K., Harold, C. M., Lee, J. H., Heo, C. G., & Shin, K. H. (2014). Fit happens globally: A meta‐analytic comparison of the relationships of person–environment fit dimensions with work attitudes and performance across East Asia, Europe, and North America. Personnel Psychology, 67(1), 99–152.
• O’Reilly, C. A., Chatman, J., & Caldwell, D. F. (1991). People and organizational culture: A profile comparison approach to assessing person–organization fit. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 487–516.
• Parker, S. K., Bindl, U. K., & Strauss, K. (2010). Making things happen: A model of proactive motivation. Journal of Management Online First, 36(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310363732
• Parker, S. K., & Collins, C. G. (2010). Taking stock: Integrating and differentiating multiple proactive behaviors. Journal of Management, 36(3), 633–662. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308321554
• Parker, S. K., Williams, H. M., & Turner, N. (2006). Modeling the antecedents of proactive behavior at work. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.3.636
• Parsons, F. (1909). Choosing a vocation. Houghton Mifflin.
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
• Rice, R. W., McFarlin, D. B., Hunt, R. G., & Near, J. P. (1985). Organizational work and the perceived quality of life: Toward a conceptual model. Academy of Management Review, 10, 296–310.
• Ruiz-Palomino, P., & Martínez-Cañas, R. (2014). Ethical culture, ethical intent, and organizational citizenship behavior: The moderating and mediating role of person–organization fit. Journal of Business Ethics, 120(1), 95–108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1650-1
• Saks, A. M., Gruman, J. A., & Cooper-Thomas, H. (2011). The neglected role of proactive behavior and outcomes in newcomer socialization. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 79(1), 36–46.
• Saks, A. M., Taggar, S., & Ashforth, B. E. (2004). A self-regulatory conceptualization of newcomer proactive socialization. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Chicago.
• Schneider, B. (1987). The people make the place. Personnel Psychology, 14, 437–453.
• Schneider, B., Kristof-Brown, A. L., Goldstein, H. W., & Smith, D. B. (1999). What is this thing called fit? In N. Anderson & P. Herriot (Eds.), International Handbook of Selection and Assessment (pp. 393–413). John Wiley & Sons.
• Schwab, D. P. (1980). Construct validity in organizational behavior. In B. Cummings & M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 3–43). JAI Press.
• Seong, J. Y., Kristof-Brown, A. L., Park, W. W., Hong, D. S., & Shin, Y. (2015). Person–group fit: Diversity antecedents, proximal outcomes, and performance at the group level. Journal of Management, 41(4), 1184–1213. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206312453738
• Smith, M. A. (2002, April). Subordinate–supervisor “fit” using the Big Five personality constructs. Paper presented at the 17th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Toronto, Canada.
• Soper, D. S. (2019a). A-priori sample size calculator for multiple regression [Computer software]. Retrieved November 5, 2019, from https://www.danielsoper.com/statcalc
• Soper, D. S. (2019b). Post-hoc sample size calculator for multiple regression [Computer software]. Retrieved November 5, 2019, from https://www.danielsoper.com/statcalc
• Thomas, J. P., Whitman, D. S., & Viswesvaran, C. (2010). Employee proactivity in organizations: A comparative meta‐analysis of emergent proactive constructs. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83(2), 275–300.
• Turban, D. B., & Jones, A. P. (1988). Supervisor–subordinate similarity: Types, effects, and mechanisms. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73(2), 228–234. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.73.2.228
• Turban, D. B., & Keon, T. L. (1993). Organizational attractiveness: An interactionist perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(2), 184–193.
• Von Bertalanffy, L. (1968). General system theory: Foundations, development, applications. George Braziller.
• Wang, Z., Zhang, J., Thomas, C. L., Yu, J., & Spitzmueller, C. (2017). Explaining benefits of employee proactive personality: The role of engagement, team proactivity composition and perceived organizational support. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 101, 90–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2017.04.002
• Wayne, S. J., & Liden, R. C. (1995). Effects of impression management on performance ratings: A longitudinal study. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 232–260.
• Woo Jin, C., & Winterich, K. (2013). Can brands move in from the outside? How moral identity enhances out-group brand attitudes. Journal of Marketing, 77(2), 96–111. Retrieved from http://www.marketingpower.com
• Zaleski, Z. (1983). Nuttina koncepcja ludzkiej motywacji [Nuttin’s concept of human motivation]. Roczniki Filozoficzne, 31(4), 219–246.
• Zhang, Z., Wang, M., & Shi, J. (2012). Leader–follower congruence in proactive personality and work outcomes: The mediating role of leader–member exchange. Academy of Management Journal, 55(1), 111–130. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.0865

Identifiers

DOI

10.18290/rpsych20233-4