Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2023 | 9 | 2 | 160-183

Article title

How to fly to safety without overpaying for the ticket

Content

Title variants

Languages of publication

Abstracts

EN
For most active investors treasury bonds (govs) provide diversification and thus reduce the risk of a portfolio. These features of govs become particularly desirable in times of elevated risk which materialize in the form of the flight-to-safety (FTS) phenomenon. The FTS for govs provides a shelter during market turbulence and is exceptionally beneficial for portfolio drawdown risk reduction. However what if the unsatisfactory expected return from treasuries discourages higher bonds allocations? This research proposes a solution to this problem with Deep Target Volatility Equity-Bond Allocation (DTVEBA) that dynamically allocate portfolios between equity and treasuries.

Year

Volume

9

Issue

2

Pages

160-183

Physical description

Dates

published
2023

Contributors

  • Department of Investment and Financial Markets, Insttiute of Finance, Poznań University of Economics and Business, al. Niepodległości 10, 61-875 Poznań, Poland, corresponding author:
  • Department of Investment and Financial Markets, Insttiute of Finance, Poznań University of Economics and Business, al. Niepodległości 10, 61-875 Poznań, Poland, corresponding author:

References

  • Adrian, T., Crump, R. K., & Vogt, E. (2019). Nonlinearity and flight-to-safety in the risk-return trade-off for stocks and bonds. The Journal of Finance, 74(4), 1931–1973. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12776
  • Andersen, T. G., & Bollerslev, T. (1998). Answering the skeptics: Yes, standard volatility models do provide accurate forecasts. International Economic Review, 39(4), 885–905. https://doi.org/10.2307/2527343
  • Baele, L., Bekaert, G., Inghelbrecht, K., & Wei, M. (2020). Flights to safety. The Review of Financial Studies, 33(2), 689–746. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhz055
  • Barndorff-Nielsen, O. E. (2004). Power and bipower variation with stochastic volatility and jumps. Journal of Financial Econometrics, 2(1), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1093/jjfinec/nbh001
  • Baur, D. G., & Lucey, B. M. (2009). Flights and contagion-An empirical analysis of stock-bond correlations. Journal of Financial Stability, 5(4), 339–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2008.08.001
  • Beber, A., Brandt, M. W., & Kavajecz, K. A. (2009). Flight-to-quality or flight-to-liquidity? Evidence from the Euro-area bond market. Review of Financial Studies, 22(3), 925–957. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhm088
  • Becker, R., Clements, A. E., Doolan, M. B., & Hurn, A. S. (2015). Selecting volatility forecasting models for portfolio allocation purposes. International Journal of Forecasting, 31(3), 849–861. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2013.11.007
  • Będowska-Sójka, B. (2018). Is intraday data useful for forecasting VaR? The evidence from EUR/PLN exchange rate. Risk Management, 20(4), 326–346. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41283-018-0038-z
  • Bengio, Y., Simard, P., & Frasconi, P. (1994). Learning long-term dependencies with gradient descent is difficult. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 5(2), 157–166. https://doi.org/10.1109/72.279181
  • Bollerslev, T. (1986). Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity. Journal of Econometrics, 31(3), 307–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(86)90063-1
  • Bongaerts, D., Kang, X., & van Dijk, M. (2020). Conditional volatility targeting. Financial Analysts Journal, 76(4), 54–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/0015198X.2020.1790853
  • Boucher, C., & Tokpavi, S. (2019). Stocks and bonds: Flight-to-safety for ever? Journal of International Money and Finance, 95, 27–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2019.03.002
  • Brooks, C. (1998). Predicting stock index volatility: Can market volume help? Journal of Forecasting, 17(1), 59–80. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-131X(199801)17:1<59::AID-FOR676>3.0.CO;2-H
  • Cho, K., Van Merriënboer, B., Gulcehre, C., Bahdanau, D., Bougares, F., Schwenk, H., & Bengio, Y. (2014). Learning phrase representations using RNN encoder-decoder for statistical machine translation. Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), 1724–1734. Doha. Qatar. https://doi.org/10.3115/v1/d14-1179
  • Christensen, K., Siggaard, M., & Veliyev, B. (2021). A machine learning approach to volatility forecasting. Creates Research Papers. https://ideas.repec.org/p/aah/create/2021-03.html
  • Cong, L., Tang, K., Wang, J., & Zhang, Y. (2020, June 1). Deep sequence modeling: Development and applications in asset pricing. The Journal of Financial Data Science. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3646170
  • Fleming, J., Kirby, C., & Ostdiek, B. (2003). The economic value of volatility timing using “realized” volatility. Journal of Financial Economics, 67(3), 473–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(02)00259-3
  • Géron, A. (2019). Hands-on machine learning with scikit-learn, keras, and tensor-flow: Concepts, tools, and techniques to build intelligent systems. O’Reilly Media, Incorporated. https://books.google.pl/books?id=OCS1twEACAAJ
  • Glosten, L. R., Jagannathan, R., & Runkle, D. E. (1993). On the relation between the expected value and the volatility of the nominal excess return on stocks.The Journal of Finance, 48(5), 1779–1801. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1993.tb05128.x
  • Grabowski, W., Janus, J., & Stawasz-Grabowska, E. (2023). The influence of monetary policy response to the COVID-19 crisis on dynamic connectedness across financial markets in Central and Eastern Europe. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 11(1), 7–28. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2023.110101
  • Greff, K., Srivastava, R. K., Koutník, J., Steunebrink, B. R., & Schmidhuber, J. (2015). LSTM: A search space odyssey. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 28(10), 2222–2232. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2016.2582924
  • Gu, S., Kelly, B., & Xiu, D. (2020). Autoencoder asset pricing models. Journal of Econometrics, 222(1), 429–450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2020.07.009
  • Hamid, S. A., & Iqbal, Z. (2004). Using neural networks for forecasting volatility of S&P 500 Index futures prices. Journal of Business Research, 57(10), 1116–1125. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(03)00043-2
  • Hansen, P. R., & Lunde, A. (2005). A forecast comparison of volatility models: Does anything beat a GARCH(1,1)? Journal of Applied Econometrics, 20(7), 873–889. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.800
  • Heber, G., Lunde, A., Shephard, N., & Sheppard, K. K. (2009). Oxford-Man Institute’s realized library. Oxford-Man Institute, University of Oxford, Library Version: 0.3.
  • Hocquard, A., Ng, S., & Papageorgiou, N. (2013). A constant-volatility framework for managing tail risk. Journal of Portfolio Management, 39(2), 28–40. https://doi.org/10.3905/jpm.2013.39.2.028
  • Hyup Roh, T. (2007). Forecasting the volatility of stock price index. Expert Systems with Applications, 33(4), 916–922. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2006.08.001
  • Kaczmarek, T., Będowska-Sójka, B., Grobelny, P., & Perez, K. (2022). False safe haven assets: Evidence from the target volatility strategy based on recurrent neural network. Research in International Business and Finance, 60, 101610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2021.101610
  • Kim, H. Y., & Won, C. H. (2018). Forecasting the volatility of stock price index: A hybrid model integrating LSTM with multiple GARCH-type models. Expert Systems with Applications, 103, 25–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2018.03.002
  • Kim, Y., & Enke, D. (2016). Using neural networks to forecast volatility for an asset allocation strategy based on the target volatility. Procedia Computer Science, 95, 281–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PROCS.2016.09.335
  • Kim, Y., & Enke, D. (2018). A dynamic target volatility strategy for asset allocation using artificial neural networks. The Engineering Economist, 63(4), 273–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/0013791X.2018.1461287
  • Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. L. (2015, December 22). Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. 3rd International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR). Conference Track Proceedings.
  • Lehnert, T. (2022). International review of financial analysis flight-to-safety and retail investor behavior. International Review of Financial Analysis, 81, 102142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2022.102142
  • Longstaff, F. A. (2004). The flight-to-liquidity premium in U.S. treasury bond prices. Journal of Business, 77(3), 511–526. https://doi.org/10.1086/386528
  • Moreira, A., & Muir, T. (2017). Volatility-managed portfolios. The Journal of Finance, 72(4), 1611–1644. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12513
  • Nelson, D. B. (1991). Conditional heteroskedasticity in asset returns: A new approach. Econometrica, 59(2), 347–370. https://doi.org/10.2307/2938260
  • Perchet, R., de Carvalho, R. L., Heckel, T., & Moulin, P. (2016). Predicting the success of volatility targeting strategies: Application to equities and other asset classes. The Journal of Alternative Investments, 18(3), 21–38. https://doi.org/10.3905/jai.2016.18.3.021
  • Poon, S. H., & Granger, C. (2005). Practical issues in forecasting volatility. Financial Analysts Journal, 61(1), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.2469/faj.v61.n1.2683
  • Prokopczuk, M., & Wese Simen, C. (2014). The importance of the volatility risk premium for volatility forecasting. Journal of Banking & Finance, 40, 303–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2013.12.002
  • Zakamulin, V. (2019). Volatility weighting over time in the presence of transaction costs. Journal of Wealth Management, 21(4), 33–45. https://doi.org/10.3905/jwm.2019.21.4.033

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

Biblioteka Nauki
9252090

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.ojs-doi-10_18559_ebr_2023_2_738
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.