Nudity, Sexuality, Photography. Visual Redefinition of the Body

• Authors: Tomasz Ferenc
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

The article examines the relations between photography, body, nudity, and sexuality. It presents changing relations of photography with a naked or semi-naked body and different forms and recording conventions. From the mid-19th century the naked body became the subject of scientifically grounded photographic explorations, an allegorical motif referring to painting traditions, an object of interest and excitement for the newly-developed “touristic” perspective. These three main ways in which photographs depicting nudity were being taken at that time shaped three visual modes: artistic-documentary, ethnographic-travelling, and scientific-medical. It has deep cultural consequences, including those in the ways of shaping the notions of the corporeal and the sexual. Collaterally, one more, probably prevalent in numbers, kind of photographical images arose: pornographic. In the middle of the 19th century, the repertoire of pornographic pictures was already very wide, and soon it become one of the photographic pillars of visual imagination of the modern society, appealing to private and professional use of photography, popular culture, advertisement, art. The number of erotic and pornographic pictures rose hand over fist with the development of digital photography. Access to pornographic data is easy, fast, and cheap, thanks to the Internet, as it never was before. Photography has fuelled pornography, laying foundations for a massive and lucrative business, employing a huge group of professional sex workers. How all those processes affected our imagination and real practices, what does the staggering number of erotic photography denote? One possible answer comes from Michel Foucault who suggests that our civilization does not have any ars erotica, but only scientia sexualis. Creating sexual discourse became an obsession of our civilization, and its main pleasure is the pleasure of analysis and a constant production of truth about sex. Maybe today the main pleasure is about watching technically registered images, and perhaps that is why we may consider visual redefinition of the body as the main social effect of the invention of the photography.

Keywords

EN

Body; Photography; Nudity; Sexuality; Amateur and Professional Pornography; Sex Workers; Ars Erotica; Scientia Sexualis

• Publisher: Uniwersytet Łódzki. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
• Journal: Qualitative Sociology Review
• Year: 2018
• Volume: 14
• Issue: 2
• Pages: 96-114

Dates

published

2018-08-28

Contributors

author

Tomasz Ferenc

• University of Lodz, Poland

References

• Belting, Hans. 2007. Antropologia obrazu. Szkice do nauki o obrazie. Cracow: Universitas.
• Berger, John. 1997. Sposoby widzenia. Poznan: Rebis.
• Brauchitsch, Boris, von. 2004. Mała historia fotografii. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Cyklady.
• Drozdowski, Rafał. 2009. Obraza na obrazy. Strategie społecznego oporu wobec obrazów dominujących. Poznan: Zysk i S-ka.
• Edwards, Steve. 2014. Fotografia. Bardzo krótkie wprowadzenie. Cracow: Nomos.
• Ewing, William A. 1998. Ciało. Antologia fotografii ludzkiego ciała. Warsaw: Prima.
• Ewing, William A. 1999. Miłość i pożądanie. Antologia fotografii romantycznej i erotycznej. Warsaw: Albatros.
• Foucault, Michel. 1978. The History of Sexuality Volume 1: An Introduction. New York: Vintage Books.
• Frizot, Michel, (ed.). 1998. A New History of Photography. Köln: Könemann.
• Goffman, Erving. 2012. “Ramy fotografii.” Pp. 265-304 in Foto społeczeństwo. Antologia tekstów z socjologii wizualnej, edited by M. Bogunio-Borowska and P. Sztompka. Cracow: Znak.
• Gorska, Katarzyna L. 2015. “‘Przeznaczone dla matek, lekarzy i artystów.’ Fotografia w poradnikach popularno naukowych XIX i XX wieku.” Pp. 127-144 in Miejsce fotografii w badaniach humanistycznych, edited by M. Ziętkiewicz and M. Biernacka. Warsaw: Stowarzyszenie Liber pro Arte.
• Hannavay, John, (ed.). 2008. Encyclopedia of Nineteenth-Century Photography. New York: Routledge.
• Janczyk, Marek and Iwona Święch. 2006. “Wokół fotografii ciała.” Pp. 3-9 in Sesja. Punkt widzenia. Fotografia ciała, edited by M. Janczyk and I. Święch. Cracow: Museum of Photography History in Cracow.
• Metz, Christian. 2006. “Fotografia i fetysz.” Kwartalnik Filmowy 54-55:246-254.
• Mirzoeff, Nicholas. 2016. Jak zobaczyć świat. Warsaw: Museum of Contemporary Art; Cracow: Karakter.
• Nead, Lynda. 1998. Akt kobiecy. Sztuka, Obscena i seksualność. Poznan: Rebis.
• Olechnicki, Krzysztof. 2005. “Fotografia dla każdego. Społeczne funkcje fotografii w dobie kultury konsumpcyjnej.” Pp. 37-60 in Przestrzenie fotografii. Antologia tekstów, edited by T. Ferenc, K. Makowski. Lodz: Galeria f5 & Księgarnia fotograficzna.
• Pilichowski-Ragno, Andrzej. 2006. “Akt jako alienacja. Parę uwag na temat ciała (gdy staje się fotografią).” Pp. 46-48 in Sesja. Punkt widzenia. Fotografia ciała, edited by M. Janczyk and I. Świech. Cracow: Museum of Photography History in Cracow.
• Pustoła, Magdalena. 2004. “Życie to pornografia.” Krytyka Polityczna 6:205-206.
• Rosenblum, Naomi. 1997. A World History of Photography. New York, London, Paris: Abbeville Press.
• Rouillé, André. 2007. Fotografia. Między dokumentem a sztuką współczesną. Cracow: Universitas.
• Schroeder, Jonathan E. and Pierre McDonagh. 2006. “The Logic of Pornography in Digital Camera Promotion.” Pp. 219-242 in Sex in Consumer Culture. The Erotic Content of Media and Marketing, edited by J. Lambiase and T. Reichert. Mahwah, New Jersey, London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Sizeranne, Robert, de la. 1983. “Czy fotografia jest sztuką?” Obscura 1983/13/3; 1983/14/4.
• Struk, Janina. 2007. Holokaust w fotografiach. Interpretacje dowodów. Warsaw: Prószyński i S-ka.
• Śnieciński, Marek. 2013. “Spektakl ciała – akt w polskiej fotografii.” DYSKURS: Pismo Naukowo-Artystyczne ASP we Wrocławiu 15:204-224.
• Welsch, Wolfgang. 1999. “Procesy estetyzacji. Zjawiska, rozróżnienia, perspektywy.” Pp. 15-52 in Sztuka i estetyzacja. Studia teoretyczne, edited by K. Zamiara and M. Golka. Poznan: Humaniora.

Identifiers

DOI

10.18778/1733-8077.14.2.06