Sensorial Aesthetics: Cross-Modal Stylistics in Modernist Fiction

• Authors: Niklas Salmose
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

This article argues that modernist fiction pointedly involves all our senses as part of its reaction to the project of modernity and progress, as well as to Victorian realism; it is not just a response to a heighted sensibility towards new soundscapes, new perceptions of motion and new olfactory experiences in the aftermath of industrialization and modernization. This “rebellion” involves a shift of focus from outer, rational and objective reality to inner, irrational and subjective consciousness, which drives the emphasis on emotional and sensational experience. The article suggests that in light of recent important developments in cognitive, psychological and neurological research, as well as in affect studies and intermedial and multimodal studies, there is reason to revise modernist stylistics. This could predominantly be done within the theoretical field and taxonomy of intermediality, as proposed by Lars Elleström. The latter half of the article discusses some textual modernist samples to more convincingly establish a theory of modernist sensorial aesthetics.

Keywords

EN

modernism; sensorial aesthetics; cross-modal iconicity; senses

• Publisher: Uniwersytet Łódzki. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
• Journal: Text Matters: A Journal of Literature, Theory and Culture
• Year: 2020
• Issue: 10
• Pages: 321-335

Dates

published

2020-11-24

Contributors

author

Niklas Salmose

• Linnaeus University, Sweden

• https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0115-4995

References

• Ahlner, Felix, and Jordan Zlatev. “Cross-Modal Iconicity: A Cognitive Semiotic Approach to Sound Symbolism.” Sign Systems Studies 38.1 (2010): 298–348. Print. https://doi.org/10.12697/SSS.2010.38.1-4.11
• Bäckström, Per. “Suspicion in the Ear.” Sense and Senses in Aesthetics. Ed. Per Bäckström and Troels Degn Johansson. Gothenburg: NSU, 2003. 96–114. Print.
• Bruhn, Jørgen. “Intermedialitet: Framtidens Humanistiska Grunddisciplin?” Tidsskrift för litteraturvetenskap 1 (2008): 21–39. Print.
• Bucknell, Brad. Literary Modernism and Musical Aesthetics: Pater, Pound, Joyce and Stein. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2002. Print.
• Bullock, Marcus. “Bad Company: On the Theory of Literary Modernity and Melancholy in Walter Benjamin and Julia Kristeva.” Boundary 22.3 (1995): 59–79. Print. https://doi.org/10.2307/303723
• Calvert, Gemma, Charles Spence, and Barry E. Stein. The Handbook of Multisensory Processes. Cambridge, MA: MIT, 2004. Print.
• Carroll, Noël. “Art, Narrative, and Emotion.” Emotion and the Arts. Ed. Mette Hjort and Sue Laver. New York: Oxford UP, 1997. 190–211. Print.
• Cather, Willa. O Pioneers! New York: Dover, 1993. Print.
• Conrad, Joseph. Lord Jim: A Romance. New York: McClure, Phillips & Co., 1905. Print.
• Conrad, Joseph. The Nigger of Narcissus: A Tale of the Sea. New York: Doubleday, 1935. Print.
• Crangle, Sara. “Phenomenology and Affect: Modernist Sulking.” A Handbook for Modernist Studies. Ed. Jean‐Michel Rabaté. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell, 2013. 327–45. Print. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118488638.ch19
• Danius, Sara. The Senses of Modernism: Technology, Perception, and Aesthetics. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 2002. Print.
• Delville, Michel. Food, Poetry, and the Aesthetics of Consumption: Eating the Avant-Garde. New York: Routledge, 2008. Print.
• De Sousa, Ronald. “Fetishism and Objectivity in Aesthetic Emotion.” Emotion and the Arts. Ed. Mette Hjort and Sue Laver. New York: Oxford UP, 1997. 177–89. Print.
• Elleström, Lars. “Bridging the Gap Between Image and Metaphor Through Cross-Modal Iconicity: An Interdisciplinary Model.” Dimensions of Iconicity. Ed. Angelika Zirker, Matthias Bauer, Olga Fischer and Christina Ljungberg. Amsterdam: John Benjamin’s, 2017. 167–90. Print. https://doi.org/10.1075/ill.15.10ell
• Elleström, Lars. “Identifying, Construing, and Bridging over Media Borders.” Scripta Uniandrade 16.3 (2018): 15–30. Print. https://doi.org/10.5935/1679-5520.20180043
• Elleström, Lars. “The Modalities of Media: A Model for Understanding Intermedial Relations.” Media Borders, Multimodality and Intermediality. Ed. Lars Elleström. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010. 11–48. Print. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230275201_2
• Elleström, Lars. “Transfer of Media Characteristics among Dissimilar Media.” Palabra Clave 20.3 (2017): 663–85. Print. https://doi.org/10.5294/pacla.2017.20.3.4
• Faulkner, William. The Sound and the Fury. London: Vintage, 1995. Print.
• Figlerowicz, Marta. “Affect Theory Dossier. An Introduction.” Qui Parle 20.2 (2012): 3–18. Print. https://doi.org/10.5250/quiparle.20.2.0003
• Forceville, Charles. “Non-Verbal and Multimodal Metaphor in a Cognitvist Framework: Agendas for Research.” Multimodal Metaphor. Ed. Charles Forceville and Eduardo Urios-Aparisi. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2009. 19–42. Print. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110215366
• Frattarola, Angela. “Developing an Ear for the Modernist Novel: Virginia Woolf, Dorothy Richardson and James Joyce.” Journal of Modern Literature 33.1 (2009): 132–53. Print. https://doi.org/10.2979/JML.2009.33.1.132
• Garrington, Abbie. Haptic Modernism: Touch and the Tactile in Modernist Writing. Edinburgh: Edinburgh UP, 2013. Print. https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9780748641741.001.0001
• Hemingway, Ernest. A Farewell to Arms. London: Arrow, 1994. Print.
• Joyce, James. Ulysses. New York: Garland,1984. Print.
• Lowry, Malcolm. Under the Volcano. London: Penguin, 1947. Print.
• Lyons, William. “On Looking into Titian’s Assumption.” Emotion and the Arts. Ed. Mette Hjort and Sue Laver. New York: Oxford UP, 1997. 139–56. Print.
• Mahaffey, Vicki. “Streams Beyond Consciousness: Stylistic Immediacy in the Modernist Novel.” A Handbook for Modernist Studies. A Handbook for Modernist Studies. Ed. Jean‐Michel Rabaté. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell, 2013. 35–54. Print. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118488638.ch2
• Martino, Gail, and Lawrence E. Marks. “Cross-Modal Interaction between Vision and Touch: The Role of Synesthetic Correspondence.” Perception 29 (2000): 745–54. Print. https://doi.org/10.1068/p2984
• Matravers, Derek. Art and Emotion. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1998. Print.
• Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. Phenomenology of Perception. Trans. Colin Smith. London: Routledge, 1962. Print.
• Ramachandran, Vilayanur S., and Edward M. Hubbard. “Synaesthesia: A Window into Perception, Thought and Language.” Journal of Consciousness Studies 8.12 (2001): 3–34. Print.
• Rasula, Jed. “‘Listening to Incense’: Melomania & the Pathos of Emancipation.” Journal of Modern Literature 31.1 (2007): 1–20. Print. https://doi.org/10.2979/JML.2007.31.1.1
• Rindisbacher, Hans J. The Smell of Books: A Cultural-Historical Study of Olfactory Perception in Literature. Ann Arbor: U of Michigan P, 1992. Print. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.23363
• Shklovsky, Viktor. “Art as Technique.” Trans. Marion J. Reis. Russian Formalist Criticism: Four Essays. Ed. Marion J. Reis. Lincoln: U of Nebraska P, 1965. 3–24. Print.
• Solomon, Robert C. “In Defense of Sentimentality.” Emotion and the Arts. Ed. Mette Hjort and Sue Laver. New York: Oxford UP, 1997. 225–45. Print.
• Taylor, Julie, ed. Modernism and Affect. Edinburgh: Edinburgh UP, 2015. Print. https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9780748693252.001.0001
• Waugh, Evelyn. Brideshead Revisited: The Sacred and Profane Memories of Captain Charles Ryder. London: Penguin Classics, 2008. Print.
• Westling, Louise. “Virginia Woolf and the Flesh of the World.“ New Literary History 30. 4 (1999): 855–75. Print. https://doi.org/10.1353/nlh.1999.0055
• Woolf, Virginia. “Modern Fiction.” The Essays of Virginia Woolf. Ed. Stuart Nelson Clarke and Andrew McNeillie. London: Hogarth, 1986. 157–65. Print.
• Zender, Karl F. “Faulkner and the Power of Sound.” PMLA 99.1 (1984): 89–108. Print. https://doi.org/10.2307/462037

Identifiers

DOI

10.18778/2083-2931.10.18