Systemically Important Banks – Risk Transfer in the Euro Area

• Authors: Jan Koleśnik

Title variants

PL

Banki systemowo ważne – transfer ryzyka w ramach strefy euro

Abstracts

PL

Cel artykułu. Podstawowym celem artykułu jest ocena kierunków i skali transferu ryzyka w ramach strefy euro za pośrednictwem banków systemowo ważnych. W artykule dokonano także krytycznej analizy oraz praktycznego zastosowania nadzorczych i złożonych miar identyfikacji banków systemowo ważnych. Metoda badawcza. Wpływ transferu ryzyka systemowego za pośrednictwem banków systemowo ważnych dla krajów macierzystych i goszczących zbadano za pomocą nadzorczej miary udziału pojedynczego banku w krajowym ryzyku systemowym. Dodatkowo wykorzystano także model SRISK. Wyniki badań. Przeprowadzone badania wykazały, że transfer ryzyka potencjalnie ma charakter jednokierunkowy, tzn. z krajów tzw. starej unii do krajów w ramach tej grupy lub do krajów tzw. nowej unii. Zidentyfikowane zostały przy tym trzy banki systemowo ważne, które są większym zagrożeniem dla krajowego systemu bankowego, niż ich podmioty dominujące w swoich krajach. Dodatkowo wykazano, iż w przypadku trzech krajów łączny wkład do ryzyka lokalnych banków systemowo ważnych, będących podmiotami zależnymi banków systemowo ważnych z innych krajów strefy euro przekracza 25%.

EN

The purpose of the article/hypothesis. The main aim of this article is to assess the direction and scale of risk transfer via systemically important banks in the euro area. This paper also critically analyses and proposes practical applications of supervisory and complex measures of SIBs identification. Methodology. The impact of systemic risk transfer via O-SIBs on the home and host countries was examined using the supervisory measure of an individual bank’s contribution in the national systemic risk. Additionally, the SRISK model was used. Results of the research. The conducted research has shown that the nature of risk transfer is potentially unidirectional, i.e., from the ‘old EU’ countries to the other countries in the same group or to the ‘new EU’ states. Also, three other SIBs have been found to pose a greater threat to the national banking system than their parent entities do in their home countries. Moreover, it has been demonstrated that in three countries, the aggregate risk contribution of the local O-SIBs – being subsidiaries of O-SIBs from other Eurozone countries – exceeds 25%.

Keywords

PL

banki systemowo ważne; ryzyko systemowe; strefa euro; SRISK; transfer ryzyka

EN

systemically important banks; systemic risk; the euro area; SRISK; risk transfer

• Publisher: Uniwersytet Łódzki. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
• Journal: Finanse i Prawo Finansowe
• Year: 2023
• Issue: 2 (Numer Specjalny)
• Pages: 57-79

Dates

published

2023

Contributors

author

Jan Koleśnik

• SGH Warsaw School of Economics

References

• Adrian, T. (2016). Brunnermeier M. K., CoVaR, American Economic Review, no. 106(7), pp. 1705–1745, https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20120555
• Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (2018). Global systemically important banks: revised assessment methodology and the higher loss absorbency requirement.
• Brownlees, Ch. and Engle, R. (2012). Volatility, Correlation and Tails for Systemic Risk Measurement. NYU-Stern Working Paper, October, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1611229
• Brownlees, Ch. and Engle, R. (2017). SRISK: A Conditional Capital Shortfall Measure of Systemic Risk. The Review of Financial Studies, no. 30(1), pp. 48–79, https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhw060
• Cai, J., Eidam, F., Saunders, A. and Steffen, S. (2018). Syndication, interconnectedness, and systemic risk. Journal of Financial Stability, no. 34, pp. 105–120, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2017.12.005
• Directive 2013/36/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on access to the activity of credit institutions and amending Directive 2002/87/EC and repealing Directives 2006/48/EC and 2006/49/EC (OJ L 176, 27.6.2013, 338–436).
• European Banking Authority (2014). Guidelines on the criteria to determine the conditions of application of Article 131(3) of Directive 2013/36/EU (CRD) in relation to the assessment of other systemically important institutions (O-SIIs) (EBA/GL/2014/10).
• Foglia, M., Pacelli, V. and Wang, G.-J. (2023). Systemic risk propagation in the Eurozone: A multilayer network approach. International Review of Economics and Finance, no. 88, pp. 332–346, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2023.06.035
• Górnicka, L.A. and Zoican, M.A. (2016). Too-international-to-fail? Supranational bank resolution and market discipline. Journal of Banking & Finance, no. 65, pp. 41–58, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2016.01.005
• Huang, X., Zhou, H. and Zhu, H. (2009). A Framework for Assessing the Systemic Risk of Major Financial Institutions. Bank for International Settlements – BIS Working Papers No. 281.
• Koleśnik, J. (2019). Bankowe ryzyko systemowe – źródła i instrumenty redukcji. Warszawa: Difin.
• Koleśnik, J. and Dąbkowska, A. (2021). Methods for alleviating the problem of Too big to fail in Germany. Journal of Banking Regulation, no. 22(1), pp. 11–23, https://doi.org/10.1057/s41261-020-00125-1
• Kozińska, M. (2018). Przymusowa restrukturyzacja banków w Unii Europejskiej. Warszawa: CeDeWu.
• Li, Y., Chen, S., Goodell, J.W., Yue, D. and Liu X. (2023). Sectoral spillovers and systemic risks: Evidence from China. Finance Research Letters, no. 55, 104018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.104018
• Liikanen, E. (2012). Final report. High-level Expert group on reforming the structure of the EU banking sector.
• Lombardi, D. and Moschella, M. (2016). Domestic preferences and European banking supervision: Germany, Italy and the Single Supervisory Mechanism. West European Politics, no. 39(3), pp. 462–482, https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2016.1143242
• Mishkin, F.S. (2001). Financial policies and the prevention of financial crises in emerging market countries. NBER Working Paper Series No. 8087.
• Narayan, S., Kumar, D. and Bouri E. (2023). Systemically important financial institutions and drivers of systemic risk: Evidence from India. Pacific Basin Finance Journal, no. 82, pp. 102–155, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2023.102155
• Yan, C., Ding, Y., Liu, W., Liu, X. and Liu J. (2023). Multilayer interbank networks and systemic risk propagation: Evidence from China. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, no. 628, pp. 129–144, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2023.129144
• Zaleska, M. (2019). Actors of the Institutional Reforms of the European Banking Sector in Response to the Crisis. European Policies, Finance and Marketing, no. 21(70), pp. 234–245, https://doi.org/10.22630/PEFIM.2019.21.70.19

Identifiers

DOI

10.18778/2391-6478.S2.2023.03

Biblioteka Nauki

36104812