Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2023 | 2 (Numer Specjalny) | 123-144

Article title

A New Approach to Underpricing Phenomenon in Poland

Content

Title variants

PL
Nowe ujęcie zjawiska underpricingu w Polsce

Languages of publication

Abstracts

PL
Cel artykułu/hipoteza. Celem artykułu jest identyfikacja i ocena niedowartościowania pierwszej oferty publicznej w Polsce na rynku regulowanym i alternatywnym z uwzględnieniem podziału całkowitego niedowartościowania na niedowartościowanie pierwotne i niedowartościowanie wtórne. W badaniu uwzględniono również różne rodzaje IPO (zimne, neutralne, gorące). Takie podejście do obliczania underpricingu w oparciu o dane pochodzące zarówno z rynku regulowanego Giełdy Papierów Wartościowych w Warszawie, jak i rynku alternatywnego – NewConnect, jest pionierskie na polskim rynku. Metodyka. Analizą statystyczną objęto 271 spółek debiutujących na rynku regulowanym Giełdy Papierów Wartościowych w Warszawie w latach 2005–2022 oraz 585 spółek debiutujących na rynku alternatywnym NewConnect w latach 2007–2022. Dokonano podziału łącznego niedowartościowania na niedowartościowanie pierwotne i niedowartościowanie wtórne. Podzielono IPO na oferty zimne, gorące i neutralne według poziomu wtórnego niedowartościowania. Istotność poziomu stóp zwrotu na rynku regulowanym i alternatywnym oraz różnic między nimi oceniono na podstawie testów T-studenta. Korelacje oszacowano za pomocą wskaźnika Pearsona. Wyniki/Rezultaty badania. Wyniki analizy pokazują, że w Polsce niedowartościowanie w IPO występujące na runku pierwotnym jest istotnie dodatnie, stanowiąc wynagrodzenie subskrybentów za uczestnictwo w pierwszej ofercie publicznej. Ponadto, jest ono wyższe dla debiutów na rynku alternatywnym niż rynku regulowanym. Natomiast stopy zwrotu wyliczane z cen otwarcia i cen zamknięcia w pierwszym dniu notowań są ujemne na obydwu rynkach, przy czym na rynku NewConnect są one niższe. Zarówno na rynku regulowanym, jak i alternatywnym średnie pierwotne niedowartościowanie dla zimnych IPO jest wyższe, niż dla gorących IPO. Średnie niedowartościowanie wtórne jest ujemne dla zimnych IPO i dodatnie dla gorących IPO zarówno na rynku regulowanym, jak i NewConnect. Co więcej, istnieje znacząca dodatnia korelacja pomiędzy pierwotnym i całkowitym niedowartościowaniem niezależnie od gorącego charakteru IPO, a dodatnia znacząca korelacja pomiędzy pierwotnym i wtórnym niedowartościowaniem występuje tylko w przypadku gorących ofert, podczas, gdy w przypadku zimnych ofert jest ona ujemna.
EN
The purpose of the article/hypothesis. The purpose of the article is to identify and assess the underpricing of initial public offerings in Poland on the regulated and alternative markets, considering the division of total underpricing into primary underpricing and secondary underpricing. The study also takes into account different types of IPOs (cold, neutral and hot). Such an approach to measuring underpricing based on the data coming from both the regulated market of the Warsaw Stock Exchange and the alternative market – NewConnect, is pioneering on the Polish market. Methodology. The statistical analysis covers 271 companies debuting on the regulated market of the Warsaw Stock Exchange between 2005 and 2022 and 585 companies debuting on the alternative market between 2007 and 2022. Total underpricing was divided into primary underpricing and secondary underpricing. All IPOs were split into cold, hot, and neutral offerings according to the secondary underpricing. T-tests for estimating the significance of the rate of returns were conducted for both the regulated and alternative markets. The correlations were estimated using Pearson’s index. Results of the research. The results of the analysis show that in Poland, the IPO underpricing occurring on the primary market is significantly positive, representing the remuneration of subscribers for participating in the initial public offering. Moreover, it is higher for an IPO on the alternative market than on the regulated market. In contrast, returns calculated from opening prices to closing prices on the first day of trading are negative in both markets, with lower returns in the NewConnect market. The average primary underpricing for cold IPOs is higher than for hot IPOs for both the regulated and alternative markets. Average secondary underpricing is negative for cold IPOs and positive for hot IPOs on both the regulated market and NewConnect. Furthermore, there is a significant positive correlation between primary and total underpricing regardless the hotness of the IPOs and a positive significant correlation between primary and secondary underpricing occurs only for hot offers while for cold offers it is negative.

Year

Pages

123-144

Physical description

Dates

published
2023

Contributors

  • Szkoła Główna Handlowa w Warszawie

References

  • Acedo-Ramírez, M.Á. and Ruiz-Cabestre, F.J. (2019). Total and Primary Underpricings in the IPO Market: Are They Explained by the Same Variables? Spanish Journal of Finance and Accounting / Revista Española de Financiación y Contabilidad, no. 48(2), pp. 134–159.
  • Acedo-Ramírez, M.Á., and Ruiz-Cabestre, F.J. (2014). Secondary Price Formation of IPOs on the First Trading Day in the Spanish Market. Revista de Economía Aplicada, no. 22(65), pp. 71–97.
  • Aggarwal, R. (2000). Stabilization Activities by Underwriters after Initial Public Offerings. The Journal of Finance, no. 55(3), pp. 1075–1103, https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00241
  • Aggarwal, R. (2003). Allocation of Initial Public Offerings and Flipping Activity. Journal of Financial Economics, no. 68(1), pp. 111–135, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(02)00250-7
  • Aggarwal, R. and Conroy, P. (2000). Price Discovery in Initial Public Offerings and the Role of the Lead Underwriter. The Journal of Finance, no. 55(6), pp. 2903–2922, https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00312
  • Aggarwal, R., Krigman, L. and Womack, K. (2002). Strategic IPO Underpricing, Information Momentum, and Lockup Expiration Selling. Journal of Financial Economics, no. 66(1), pp. 105–137, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(02)00152-6
  • Allen, F. and Faulhaber, G.R. (1989). Signaling by Underpricing in the IPO Market, Journal of Financial Economics, no. 23(2), pp. 303–324, https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(89)90060-3
  • Barry, Ch.B. and Jennings, R.H. (1993). The Opening Price Performance of Initial Public Offerings of Common Stock. Financial Management, no. 22(1), pp. 54–63, https://doi.org/10.2307/3665965
  • Bear, R.M. and Curley, A.J. (1975). Unseasoned Equity Financing. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, no. 10(2), pp. 311–325, http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2979038
  • Bhagat, S., Lu, J. and Rangan, S. (2018). IPO Valuation: The International Evidence. In: D. Cumming, S.A. Johan ed., The Oxford Handbook of IPO, pp. 108–145. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Bradley, D.J., Gonas, J.S., Highfield, M.J. and Roskelley, K.D. (2009). An Examination of IPO Secondary Market Returns. Journal of Corporate Finance, no. 15(3), pp. 316–330, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2009.01.003
  • Carpentier, C., Cumming, D. and Suret J.M. (2012). The Value of Capital Market Regulation: IPOs Versus Reverse Mergers. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, no. 9(1), pp. 56–91, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-1461.2011.01247.x
  • Chan, K., Wang, J. and Wei, K. (2004). Underpricing and long-term performance of IPOs in China. Journal of Corporate Finance, no. 10(3), pp. 409–430, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0929-1199(03)00023-3
  • Chan, Y. (2010). Retail Trading and IPO Returns in the Aftermarket. Financial Management, no. 39(4), pp. 1475–1495, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-053X.2010.01119.x
  • Chang, E., Chen, Ch., Chi, J. and Young, M. (2008). IPO Underpricing in China: New Evidence from the Primary and Secondary Markets. Emerging Markets Review, no. 9(1), pp. 1–16.
  • Davies, J.A. (1971). Elementary survey analysis. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
  • Derrien, F. (2005). IPO Pricing in “Hot” Market Conditions: Who Leaves Money on the Table? The Journal of Finance, no. 60(1), pp. 487–521, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2005.00736.x
  • Dudycz, T. and Brycz B. (2017). What Drives the Amount of Capital Raised at IPO? Evidence from the Warsaw Stock Exchange. Argumenta Oeconomica, no. 2(39), pp. 61–89, https://doi.org/10.15611/aoe.2017.2.03
  • Ellis, K. (2006). Who trades IPOs? A close look at the first days of trading. Journal of Financial Economics, no. 79(2), pp. 339–363, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2004.09.006
  • Ellis, K., Michaely R. and O’Hara M. (2000). When the Underwriter Is the Market Maker: An Examination of Trading in the IPO Aftermarket. The Journal of Finance, no. 55(3), pp. 1039–1074, https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00240
  • Gale, I. and Stiglitz, J.E. (1989). The Informational Content of Initial Public Offerings. The Journal of Finance, no. 44(2), pp. 469–477, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1989.tb05066.x
  • Hadro, D. and Pauka, M. (2019). Underpricing on the Selected European Alternative Investment Markets. Financial Internet Quarterly “e-Finanse”, no. 15(2), pp. 87–94, https://doi.org/10.2478/fiqf-2019-0014
  • He, P. (2007). A Theory of IPO Waves. The Review of Financial Studies, no. 20(4), pp. 983–1020, https://doi.org/10.1093/revfin/hhm004
  • Helwege, J. and Liang, N. (2004). Initial Public Offerings in Hot and Cold Markets. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, no. 39(3), pp. 541–569. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022109000004026
  • Ibbotson, R.G. (1975). Price Performance of Common Stock New Issues. Journal of Financial Economics, no. 2(3), pp. 235–272, https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(75)90015-X
  • Ibbotson, R.G. and Jaffe, J. (1975). ‘Hot issue’ markets. Journal of Finance, no. 30(4), pp. 1027–1042, https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(75)90015-X
  • Ibbotson, R.G., Sindelar, J.L. and Ritter, J.R. (1988). Initial public offerings. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, no. 1(2), pp. 37–45, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6622.1988.tb00164.x
  • Ibbotson, R.G., Sindelar, J.L. and Ritter, J.R. (1994). The Market’s Problems with the Pricing of Initial Public Offering. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, no. 7(1), pp. 66–74, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6622.1994.tb00395.x
  • Johan, S.A. (2010). Listing standards as a signal of IPO preparedness and quality. International Review of Law and Economics, no. 30(2), pp. 128–144, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2009.12.001
  • Krigman, L., Shaw, W.H. and Womack, K.L. (1999). The Persistence of IPO Mispricing and the Predictive Power of Flipping. The Journal of Finance, no. 54(3), pp. 1015–1044, https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00135
  • Lizińska, J. and Czapiewski, I. (2015). Determinanty underpricingu w Polsce i na innych rynkach wschodzących. Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, nr 386, s. 112–125.
  • Lizińska, J. and Czapiewski, L. (2014). Performance of Polish IPO Firms: Size and Proitability Effect. Gospodarka Narodowa, no. 1, pp. 53–71, https://doi.org/10.33119/GN/100877
  • Ljungquvist, A. (2007). IPO Underpricing. In: B.E. Eckbo ed., Handbook of Corporate Finance, pp. 375–422. North Holland: Elsevier.
  • Ljungqvist, A.P. (1997). Pricing initial public offerings: Further evidence from Germany. European Economic Review, no. 41(7), pp. 1309–1320, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-2921(96)00035-9
  • Loughran, T. and Ritter, J.R. (1995). The New Issues Puzzle. The Journal of Finance, no. 50(1), pp. 23–51, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1995.tb05166.x
  • Loughran, T. and Ritter, J.R. (2002). Why Don’t Issuers Get Upset about Leaving Money on the Table in IPOs? The Review of Financial Studies, no. 15(2), pp. 413–443, https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/15.2.413
  • Loughran, T. and Ritter, J.R. (2004). Why Has IPO Underpricing Changed Over Time? Financial Management, no. 3(4), pp. 5–37, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.331780
  • Loughran, T., Ritter, J.R. and Rydqvist, K. (1994). Initial Public Offerings: International Insights. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, no. 2, pp. 165–199, https://doi.org/10.1016/0927-538X(94)90016-7
  • Lowry, M. (2003). Why does IPO volume fluctuate so much? Journal of Financial Economics, no. 67(1), pp. 3–40, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(02)00230-1
  • Lowry, M., Officer, M.S. and Schwert, G.W. (2010). The Variability of IPO Initial Returns. The Journal of Finance, no. 65(2), pp. 425–465, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2009.01540.x
  • Mąka, M. (2008). Stabilizowanie kursów akcji i praw do akcji w świetle prawa polskiego i prawa wspólnotowego. Transformacje Prawa Prywatnego, nr 1, s. 19–31.
  • McDonald, J.G. and Fisher, A.K. (1972). New-Issue Stock Price Behavior. The Journal of Finance, no. 27(1), pp. 97–102, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1972.tb00624.x
  • Miller, E.E. (1977). Risk, uncertainty, and divergence of opinion. Journal of Finance, no. 32(4), pp. 1151–1168, https://doi.org/10.2307/2326520
  • Miller, R.E. and Reilly, F.K. (1987). An Examination of Mispricing, Returns, and Uncertainty for Initial Public Offerings. Financial Management, no. 16(2), pp. 33–38, https://doi.org/10.2307/3666001
  • Mizerka, J. i Lizińska, J., red. (2017). Pierwsze oferty publiczne w Polsce i na świecie. Kontrowersje wokół anomalii rynkowych. Warszawa: CeDeWu.
  • Neuberger, B.M. and Hammond, C.T. (1974). A Study of Underwriters’ Experience with Unseasoned New Issues. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, no. 9(2), pp. 165–177, http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2330092
  • Perera, W. and Kulendran, N. (2016). New evidence of short-run underpricing in Australian IPOs. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, no. 13(2), pp. 99–108, http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.13(2).2016.11
  • Podedworna-Tarnowska, D. (2020). Niedowartościowanie spółek debiutujących na rynku głównym i alternatywnym Giełdy Papierów Wartościowych w Warszawie. W: P. Antonowicz, P. Galiński, P. Pisarewicz, red., Perspektywa ekonomiczna, finansowa i prawna kreowania wartości w gospodarce, s. 267–281. Gdańsk: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego.
  • Podedworna-Tarnowska, D. (2022). Costs of IPO in Poland. Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska, Sectio H – Oeconomia, no. 56(4), pp. 135–160, http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/h.2022.56.4.135-160
  • Pomykalski, P. and Domagalski, M. (2015). IPO Underpricing and Financial Analysts’ Forecast Accuracy in Poland. Acta Universitatis Lodziensis, Folia Oeconomica, no. 1(310), pp. 117–132, https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6021.310.09
  • Puławski, M. (2013). Koszt pierwszej oferty publicznej na rynku akcji w Polsce w latach 2008–2012. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego. Finanse, Rynki Finansowe, Ubezpieczenia, nr 63, s. 435–447.
  • Reilly, F.K. (1973). Further Evidence on Short-Run Results for New Issue Investors. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, no. 8(1), pp. 83–90, https://doi.org/10.2307/2329750
  • Reilly, F.K. (1977). New Issues Revisited. Financial Management, no. 6(4), pp. 28–42, http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3664963
  • Reilly, F.K. and Hatfield, K. (1969). Investor Experience with New Stock Issues. Financial Analysts Journal, no. 25(5), pp. 73–80, http://dx.doi.org/10.2469/faj.v25.n5.73
  • Ritter, J.R. (1984). The “Hot Issue” Market of 1980. The Journal of Business, no. 57(2), pp. 215–240, http://doi.org/10.1086/296260
  • Ritter, J.R. (1987). The Costs of Going Public. Journal of Financial Economics, no. 19(2), pp. 269–281, https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(87)90005-5
  • Ritter, J.R. (2003). Differences between European and American IPO Markets. European Financial Management, no. 9(4), pp. 421–434, https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-036X.00230
  • Ritter, J.R. and Welch, I. (2002). A Review of IPO Activity, Pricing, and Allocations. The Journal of Finance, no. 57(4), pp. 1795–1828, https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6261.00478
  • Rock, K. (1986). Why new issues are underpriced? Journal of Financial Economics, no. 15, pp. 187–212, https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(86)90054-1
  • Rydqvist, K. and Hogholm, K. (1995). Going public in the 1980s: Evidence from Sweden. European Financial Management, no. 1(3), pp. 287–315, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-036X.1995.tb00021.x
  • Schultz, P.H. and Zaman, M.A. (1994). After Market Support and Underpricing of Initial Public Offerings. Journal of Financial Economics, no. 35(2), pp. 199–219, https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(94)90004-3
  • Shiller, R.J. (1990). Speculative Prices and Popular Models. Journal of Economics Perspectives, no. 4(2), pp. 55–65, http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/jep.4.2.55
  • Sieradzki, R. (2016). Niedowartościowanie pierwotnych ofert publicznych na przykładzie akcji notowanych na Giełdzie Papierów Wartościowych w Warszawie. Rozprawa doktorska. Kraków: Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Krakowie.
  • Siwek, P. (2005). Praktyka pierwszych ofert publicznych w Polsce. Warszawa: CeDeWu.
  • Stoll, H.R. and Curley, A.J. (1970). Small Business and the New Issues Market for Equities. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, no. 5(3), pp. 309–322, http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2329998
  • Stoughton, N.M., Wong, K.P. and Zechner, J. (2001). IPOs and Product Quality. The Journal of Business, no. 74(3), pp. 375–408, https://doi.org/10.1086/321931
  • Sukacz, D. (2005). Pierwsze oferty publiczne na rynkach kapitałowych. Warszawa: CeDeWu.
  • Welch, I. (1992). Sequential Sales, learning, and Cascades. The Journal of Finance, no. 47(2), pp. 695–732, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1992.tb04406.x
  • Vismara, S., Paleari, S. and Ritter, J.R. (2012). Europe’s Second Markets for Small Companies. European Financial Management, no. 18(3), pp. 352–388, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-036X.2012.00641.x
  • Zarzecki, D. and Wołoszyn, A. (2013). The impact Impact of the January Eeffect on the IPO Underpricing in Poland. Folia Oeconomica Stetinensia, no. 13(1), pp. 121–135, https://doi.org/10.18276/frfu.2016.4.82/2-28

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

Biblioteka Nauki
36107118

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.ojs-doi-10_18778_2391-6478_S2_2023_06
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.