Playing distressed art: Adorno’s aesthetic theory in game design

• Authors: Benjamin Hanussek

Abstracts

EN

The discussion on games as (not) art has been raging for decades without reaching a consensus. It is argued here that the ontological status of games is irrelevant for the perception and development of aesthetic experiences in videogames. Instead, game design should be regarded as ripe to convey the experience of art according  to established aesthetic theories. The essay presents Adorno’s aesthetic theory and highlights its reflections in the games Papers, Please and Observer. It then describes how they were synthesized into a  critical gameplay experience in the author’s game Distressed. The latter may be regarded as an example of a method in game studies in which the aesthetic potential of games is explored by creation rather than analysis. Arguably, this reveals the importance of epistemological approaches  towards games and art instead of the predominant ontological ones.

Keywords

EN

games as art; game studies; Adorno; aesthetic theory; critical theory; Distressed

• Publisher: Uniwersytet Łódzki. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
• Journal: Replay. The Polish Journal of Game Studies
• Year: 2021
• Volume: 8
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 73-87

Dates

published

2021

Contributors

author

Benjamin Hanussek

• Polish-Japanese Academy of Information Technology

• https://orcid.org/0000000168255980

References

• Adams, E.W. (2008). Will Computer Games Ever Be a Legitimate Art Form? International Journal of Technology Management & Sustainable Development, 7(1), 67–77. https://doi.org/10.1386/jmpr.7.1.67/1
• Adorno, T. (1951/2005). Minima Moralia: Reflections on a Damaged Life (trans. E.F. Jephcott). London: Verso.
• Adorno, T. (1970/1997). Aesthetic Theory (trans. R. Hullot-Kentor). London: Continuum.
• Barthes, R. (1984/1986). The Rustle of Language (trans. R. Howard). New York: Hill and Wang.
• Benjamin, W. (1935/2003). Das Kunstwerk im Zeitalter seiner technischen Reproduzierbarkeit. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
• Bogost, I. (2007). Persuasive Games: The Expressive Power of Videogames. Cambridge: MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/5334.001.0001
• Bourgonjon, J., Vandermeersche, G., Rutten, K., & Quinten, N. (2017). Perspectives on Video Games as Art. Comparative Literature and Culture, 19(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.7771/1481-4374.3024
• Ebert, R. (April 16, 2020). Video Games Can Never Be Art. Rogerebert.com. https://www.rogerebert.com/roger-ebert/video-games-can-never-be-art (accessed on October 26, 2021).
• Evans-Thirlwell, E. (August 17, 2017). Observer Review. Hauer of Reckoning. Eurogamer. https://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2017-08-17-observer-review (accessed on October 26, 2021).
• Formosa, P., Ryan, M., & Staines, D. (2016). Papers, Please and the Systemic Approach to Engaging Ethical Expertise in Videogames. Ethics and Information Technology, 18, 211–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-016-9407-z
• Hanussek, B. (June 16, 2021). Exercises in Immorality: Papers, Please as a Cynical Serious Game. Bhanussek.com. https://bhanussek.com/exercises-in-immorality-papers-please-as-a-cynical-serious-game/ (accessed on October 26, 2021).
• Hegel, G.W.F. (1807/1979). Phenomenology of Spirit (trans. A.V. Miller). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Helling, J. (2014). Adorno and Art Aesthetic Theory Contra Critical Theory. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Horkheimer, M., & Adorno, T. (1947/2002). Dialectic of Enlightenment (trans. J. Cumming). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
• Jones, J. (November 30, 2012). Sorry MoMA, Video Games Are Not Art. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/jonathanjonesblog/2012/nov/30/moma-video-games-art#:~:text=The%20player%20cannot%20claim%20to,it%20precedes%20the%20digital%20age (acessed on October 10, 2021).
• Juul, J. (2013). The Art of Failure: An Essay on the Pain of Playing Video Games. Cambridge: MIT Press.
• Kilgore, C.D. (2020). Post-Cyberpunk. In A. McFarlane, G.J. Murphy, & L. Schmeink (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Cyberpunk Culture (pp. 48–55). Oxon: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351139885-7
• LeBoeuf, S. (July 28, 2021). Observer: System Redux Review. Blade Runner Meets 1984 in a Tense and Atmospheric Murder Mystery. IGN. https://www.ign.com/articles/observer-system-redux-review (accessed on October 26, 2021).
• Lellock, J.S. (2015). Media Review: Papers, Please (2013) Work Simulation Role-playing Video Game. Humanity & Society, 39(1), 121–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160597614566347
• Lisberger, S. (dir.) (1982). Tron. Buena Vista Distribution.
• Marcuse, H. (1964/2007). One-Dimensional Man: Studies in the Ideology of Advanced Industrial Society. Oxon: Routledge.
• Marx, K. (2009). The Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts. Marxists. https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1844/manuscripts/preface.htm (acessed on October 25, 2021).
• Milne, D. (2002). The Beautiful Soul: From Hegel to Beckett. Diacritics, 32(1), 63–82. https://doi.org/10.1353/dia.2004.0016
• Morrissette, J. (2017). Glory to Arstotzka: Morality, Rationality, and the Iron Cage of Bureaucracy in Papers, Please. Game Studies, 17(1).
• Myers, D. (2020). Games Are Not: The Difficult and Definitive Guide to What Video Games Are. Manchester: Manchester University Press. https://doi.org/10.7765/9781526153746
• Nguyen, C.T. (2020). Games: Agency As Art. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190052089.001.0001
• Observer (PC) (2021). Metacritic. https://www.metacritic.com/game/pc/observer (acessed on October 26, 2021).
• Oshii, M. (dir.) (1995). Ghost in the Shell. Shochiku.
• Parker, F. (2018). Roger Ebert and the Games-as-Art Debate. Cinema Journal, 57(3), 77–100. https://doi.org/10.1353/cj.2018.0032
• Pearce, C. (2006). Games as aArt: The Aesthetics of Play. Visible Language, 40(1), 66–89.
• Rauscher, A. (2017). A Game of Playful Art. Transmedia Auteurs, Genre Settings, and the Cineludic Form. In G.S. Freyermuth, L. Gotto (eds.), Clash of Realities 2015/16. On the Art, Technology and Theory of Digital Games. Proceedings of the 6th and 7th Conference (pp. 195–216). Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag. https://doi. org/10.1515/9783839440315-014
• Richter, G. (2006). Aesthetic Theory and Nonpropositional Truth Content in Adorno. New German Critique, 97, 119–135. https://doi.org/10.1215/0094033X-2005-007
• Ross, N. (2015). The Aesthetic Ground of Critical Theory. London: Rowman & Littlefield International, Ltd.
• Scott, R. (dir.) (1982). Blade Runner. Warner Bros.
• Sharp, J. (2013). Works of Game: On the Aesthetics of Games and Art. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
• Sicart, M. (2019). Papers, Please. In M. Payne, N. Huntemann (eds.), How to Play Video Games (pp. 149–156). New York: New York University Press.
• Tavinor, G. (2009). The Art of Videogames. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444310177
• Tavinor, G. (2016). Art and Aesthetics. In J.P. Wolf, P. Bernard (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Video Game Studies (pp. 59–66). Oxon: Routledge.
• Thomas, J. (1988). Women and Capitalism: Oppression or Emancipation? A Review Article. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 30(3), 534–549. https://doi.org/10.1017/S001041750001536X
• Zuckert, R. (2007). Kant on Beauty and Biology: An Interpretation of the Critique of Judgment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511487323
• Zuidervaart, L. (1991). Adorno’s Aesthetic Theory: The Redemption of Illusion. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
• Bloober Team (2017). Observer [various platforms]. Aspyr.
• CtrlZ Games Collective (2021). Distressed [itch.io: https://yenrye.itch.io/distressed].CtrlZ Games Collective.
• Pope, L. (2013). Papers, Please [various platforms]. 3909 LLC.

Identifiers

DOI

10.18778/2391-8551.08.04

Biblioteka Nauki

2135603