Osobowościowe uwarunkowania ryzyka wypadków drogowych u kierowców – przegląd wybranych badań i propozycja ich interpretacji w ramach Kołowego Modelu Metacech Osobowości

• Authors: Henryk Gasiul , Włodzimierz Strus

Title variants

EN

Personality determinants of the traffic accident risk of drivers – a review of selected studies and a proposal for their interpretation within the circumplex of personality metatraits model

Abstracts

EN

The purpose of this article is a review of studies on the personality factors in risky behaviors, susceptibility to fatigue and the rate of accidents in motor vehicle traffic. We are also attempting to frame these factors within the Circumplex of Personality Metatraits (CPM) model. A large number of studies and a variety of models and measures used made the integration of the gathered empirical data difficult. While it initially appeared that the Five Factor Model of personality (also known as the Big Five model) could be used as the synthetizing function, most recent studies and analyses indicate that its potential in that respect is limited, especially when compared to models taking into account higher order factors (metatraits) of personality. One of such models is CPM and the authors propose its use as an integrating model for the existing variety of studies on the personality factors in risky behaviors, fatigue and traffic accidents. The analyses presented in the article have shown that 3 metatraits are important in this context: Delta-minus/Sensation Seeking, Alpha-minus/Disinhibition and Gamma-minus/Disharmony. We also show that a predictive model based on these broad personality variables is both parsimonious and relevant. 

PL

Celem artykułu jest przegląd badań nad osobowościowymi uwarunkowaniami zachowań ryzykownych, podatności na zmęczenie oraz wypadkowości w ruchu drogowym, a dalej próba ujęcia tych uwarunkowań w ramach Kołowego Modelu Metacech Osobowości (KMMO). Dotychczasowe badania oraz różnorodność stosowanych w nich modeli teoretycznych i narzędzi pomiaru sprawiają istotne trudności w integracji zgromadzonych danych empirycznych. Wydawało się, że Pięcioczynnikowy Model Osobowości, zwany też modelem Wielkiej Piątki, mógł spełniać taką funkcję syntetyzującą, jednak najnowsze badania i analizy wskazują na ograniczony potencjał integracyjny i teoretyczny tego modelu, szczególnie w porównaniu z modelami uwzględniającymi tzw. czynniki wyższego rzędu lub metacechy osobowości. Jednym z takich modeli jest właśnie KMMO, stąd też autorzy artykułu proponują uwzględnienie go jako modelu integrującego dotychczasowe zróżnicowane wyniki badań empirycznych nad osobowościowymi uwarunkowaniami zachowań ryzykownych, zmęczenia oraz wypadkowości w ruchu drogowym. Przedstawione w artykule analizy wykazały, że w tym kontekście istotne są 3 metacechy: Delta-minus/ Poszukiwanie wrażeń, Alfa-minus/Rozhamowanie i Gamma-minus/Dysharmonia, a model predykcyjny oparty na tych szerokich zmiennych osobowościowych jest wartościowy w sensie oszczędności i trafności.  

Keywords

PL

osobowość; wypadkowość; podatność na zmęczenie; zachowania ryzykowne na drodze; czynniki wyższego rzędu; Kołowy Model Metacech Osobowości

EN

personality; accident rate,; susceptibility to fatigue; risk behavior; higher-order factors; Circumplex of Personality Metatraits

• Publisher: Uniwersytet Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego w Warszawie
• Journal: Studia Psychologica
• Year: 2020
• Volume: 20
• Issue: 2
• Pages: 37-54

Dates

published

2020

Contributors

author

Henryk Gasiul

• Instytut Psychologii, Uniwersytet Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego w Warszawie

• https://orcid.org/0000000293488476

author

Włodzimierz Strus

• Instytut Psychologii, Uniwersytet Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego w Warszawie

• https://orcid.org/0000000250445660

References

• Ashton, M. C., Lee, K. (2007). Empirical, theoretical, and practical advantages of the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 150–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868306294907
• Becker, P. (1999). Beyond the Big Five. Personality and Individual Differences, 26, 511–530. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00168-8
• Block, J. (1995). A contrarian view of the five-factor approach to personality description. Psychological Bulletin, 177, 187–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117
• Block, J. (2001). Millennial contrarianism: the five-factor approach to personality description 5 years later. Journal of Research in Personality, 35, 98–107. https://doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.2000.2293
• Burtăverde, V., Chraif, M., Ani ţei, M., Dumitru, D. (2017). The HEXACO model of personality and risky driving behavior. Psychological Reports, 120,255–270. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294116688890
• Clarke, S., Robertson, I. T. (2005). A meta-analytic review of the Big Five personality factors and accident involvement in occupational and non-occupational settings. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 78, 355–376. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317905X26183
• Cloninger, C. R. (2004). Feeling good: the science of well-being. Nowy Jork: Oxford University Press.
• Corr, P. J. (2009). The reinforcement sensitivity theory of personality. W: P. J. Corr, G. Matthews (red.), Cambridge Handbook of Personality (s. 347–376). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• DeYoung, C. G. (2006). Higher-order factors of the Big Five in a multi-informant sample. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 1138–1151. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.91.6.1138
• DeYoung, C. G., Peterson, J. B., Higgins, D. M. (2002). Higher-order factors of the Big Five predict conformity: Are there neuroses of health? Personalityand Individual Differences, 33, 533–552. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(01)00171-4
• DeYoung, C. G., Peterson, J. B., Seguin, J. R., Tremblay, R. E. (2008). Externalizing behavior and the higher-order factors of the Big Five. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 117, 947–953. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013742
• Digman, J. M. (1997). Higher-order factors of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1246–1256. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.73.6.1246
• Donnellan, M. B., Robins, R. W. (2010). Resilient, overcontrolled, and undercontrolled personality types: issues and controversies. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4, 1070–1083. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00313.x
• Eysenck, H. J., Eysenck, M. W. (1985). Personality and individual differences: a natural science approach. Nowy Jork: Plenum Press.
• Fukuda, S., Kuratsune, H., Tajima, S., Takashima, S., Yamagutchi, K., Nishizawa, Y., Watanabe, Y. (2010). Premorbid personality in chronic fatigue syndrome as determined by the Temperament and Character Inventory. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 51, 78–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. comppsych.2009.02.002
• Gasiul, H. (2020). Psychologia osobowości: nurty – teorie – koncepcje (wyd. 3). Warszawa: Difin.
• Goldberg, L. R. (1999). A broad-bandwidth, public-domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several Five-Factor models. W: I. Mervielde, I. Deary, F. De Fruyt, F. Ostendorf (red.), Personality Psychology in Europe (t. 7, s. 7–28). Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.
• González, J. L., López-López, A., Alonso-Fernández, M., Ciudad, N., Matías-Pompa, B., Moreno-Jiménez, B. (2014). Fatigue as moderator of relationship between personality and the affective dimensions of well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15, 1363–1376. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-013-9480-5
• Gunthert, K. C., Cohen, L., Armelli, S. (1999). The role of neuroticism in daily stress and coping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1087–1100. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.5.1087
• Herzberg, Ph. Y. (2009). Beyond accident-proneness”: using Five-Factor Model prototypes to predict driving behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 1096–1100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2009.08.008
• Hirsh, J. B., DeYoung, C. G., Peterson, J. B. (2009). Metatraits of the Big Five differentially predict engagement and restraint of behavior. Journal of Personality, 77, 1085–1102. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2009.00575.x
• Just, C. (2011). A review of the literature on general factor of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 765–771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.01.008
• Kangas, M., Montgomery, G. H. (2011). The role of cognitive, emotional and personality factors in the experience of fatigue in university and community sample. Psychology and Health, 26, supl. 1, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870440903521779
• Matthews, G. (2011). Personality and individual differences in cognitive fatigue. W: P. L. Ackerman (red.), Cognitive fatigue: multidisciplinary perspectives on current research and future applications (s. 209–227). Waszyngton: APA. https://doi.org/10.1037/12343-010
• Matthews, G., Campbell, S. E. (2009). Sustained performance under overload: personality and individual differences in stress and coping. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 10, 417–442. https://doi.org/10.1080/14639220903106395
• McAdams, D. P. (1992). The five-factor model in personality: a critical appraisal. Journal of Personality, 60, 329–361. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992.tb00976.x
• McCrae, R. R., Costa, P. T., Jr. (2005). Osobowość dorosłego człowieka. Kraków: WAM .
• McCrae, R. R., John, O. P. (1992). An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications. Journal of Personality, 60, 175–215. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992.tb00970.x
• Musek, J. (2007). A general factor of personality: evidence of the Big One in the five-factor model. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 1213–1233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2007.02.003
• Revelle, W., Wilt, J. (2013). The general factor of personality: a general critique. Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 493–504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2013.04.012
• Rogoza, R., Cieciuch, J., Strus, W., Baran, T. (2019). Seeking a common framework for research on narcissism: an attempt to integrate the different faces of narcissism within the Circumplex of Personality Metatraits. European Journal of Personality, 33, 437–455. http://doi.org/10.1002/per.2206
• Rushton, J. P., Irving, P. (2011). The General Factor of Personality: normal and abnormal. W: T. Chamorro-Premuzic, S. von Stumm, A. Furnham (red.), The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of individual differences (s. 132–161). Londyn: Blackwell.
• Settles, R. E., Fischer, S., Cyders, M. A., Combs, J. L., Gunn, R. L., Smith, G. T. (2012). Negative urgency: a personality predictor of externalizing behavior characterized by neuroticism, low conscientiousness, and disagreeableness. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 121, 160–172. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024948
• Skimina, E., Strus, W., Cieciuch, J., Szarota, P., Izdebski, P. K. (2020). Psychometric properties of the Polish versions of the HEXACO-60 and the HEXACO-100 personality inventories. Current Issues in Personality Psychology, 8, 255–278. http://doi.org/10.5114/cipp.2020.98693
• Strus, W. Cieciuch, J. (2014). Poza Wielką Piątkę – przegląd nowych modeli struktury osobowości. Polskie Forum Psychologiczne, 19, 17–49. https://doi.org/10.14656/PFP20140102
• Strus, W., Cieciuch, J. (2017). Towards a synthesis of personality, temperament, motivation, emotion and mental health models within the Circumplex of Personality Metatraits. Journal of Research in Personality, 66, 70–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2016.12.002
• Strus, W., Cieciuch, J. (2021). The Circumplex of Personality Metatraits and the HEXACO model: toward refinement and integration. Journal of Personality. Advance online publication: https://doi.org/10.1111/JOPY.12616
• Strus, W., Cieciuch, J., Rowiński, T. (2014a). The Circumplex of Personality Metatraits: a synthesizing model of personality based on the Big Five. Review of General Psychology, 18, 273–286. https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000017
• Strus, W., Cieciuch, J., Rowiński, T. (2014b). The Polish adaptation of the IPIP-BFM-50 questionnaire for measuring five personality traits in the lexical approach. Annals of Psychology, 17, 347–366. Pobrane z: http://czasopisma.tnkul.pl/index.php/rpsych/article/view/3163
• Strus, W., Cybis, N., Cieciuch, J., Rowiński, T. (2021). Number and content of personality types across methods and samples: empirical filling of the theoretically developed map of RUNO typology. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 52(3), 211–226. https://doi.org/10.24425/ppb.2021.137886
• Thayer, R. E. (1996). The origin of everyday moods: managing energy, tension, and stress. Nowy Jork: Oxford University Press.
• Yamano, E., Fukuda, S., Joudoi, T., Mizuno, K., Tanaka, M., Kataoka, Y., … Watanabe, Y. (2010). Temperament and character as predictors of fatigue-induced symptoms among school children in Japan: a 1-year follow-up study. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 51, 256–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2009.08.001
• Zawadzki, B. (2017). The location of personality disorders in the Circumplex of Personality Metatraits. Annals of Psychology, 20, 493–512. https://doi.org/10.18290/rpsych.2017.20.2-7en
• Zawadzki, B., Strelau, J. (2003). Identyfikacja trzech podstawowych prototypów osobowości w grupach polskich: próba reorientacji badań nad osobowością z koncepcji cech w koncepcję typów. Studia Psychologiczne, 41(4), 217–242.
• Zawadzki, B., Strelau, J. (2014). O (nie)trafności ogólnego czynnika osobowości. Roczniki Psychologiczne, 17, 259–274.

Identifiers

DOI

10.21697/sp.2020.20.2.03

Biblioteka Nauki

1878768