Determinants of board diversity policy implementation by companies listed on the Warsaw Stock Exchange

• Authors: Anna Wawryszuk-Misztal

Abstracts

EN

Research background: Diversity management is one of the hot topic issues present in current public discussions. Board diversity requirements are quite new for Polish public companies. The companies listed on the Warsaw Stock Exchange have to publish a statement on the company's compliance with the corporate governance recommendations and principles included in ?Best Practice for GPW Listed Companies 2016?. This regulation is based on the 'comply or explain? principle, thus the company may decide whether to comply with every rule included in the code, but decision on not implementing one or more rules should be explained by the company. Some of the recommended rules regard the board (supervisory and management) diversity policy implementation, where diversity refers to such dimensions as gender, education, age and professional experience. Purpose of the article: This study aims to investigate determinants of board diversity policy implementation by domestic companies listed on the WSE. It also documents explanations provided by companies that do not apply board diversity policy. Methods: The research sample covers 268 non-financial domestic companies listed on the Warsaw Stock Exchange between 2016 and 30 November 2018. The companies? current reports on company compliance with the corporate governance codes and information issued on companies? websites were analyzed in order to identify those that announced implementation of board diversity policy. This study uses logistic regression analysis to identify the firm-level characteristics that may influence the implementation of board diversity policy. Findings & value added: This is the first study analyzing the drivers of board diversity policy implementation by Polish companies listed on the WSE. It shows that large companies, companies with larger management boards and companies with women acting as presidents of the supervisory boards are more likely to take actions seeking to achieve management and supervisory board diversity.

Keywords

EN

corporate governance; board diversity policy; institutional theory

• Publisher: Instytut Badań Gospodarczych
• Journal: Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy
• Year: 2021
• Volume: 16
• Issue: 3
• Pages: 617-637

Dates

published

2021

Contributors

author

Anna Wawryszuk-Misztal

• Maria Curie Skłodowska University in Lublin

• https://orcid.org/0000000250169117

References

• Accounting Act of 29 September 1994 (Journal of Laws, no. 121, item 591 as amended).
• Adams, M. (2015). Board diversity: more than a gender issue? Deakin Law Review, 20(1), 123?152. doi: 10.21153/dlr2015vol20no1art497.
• Aguilera, R. V., & Cuervo-Cazurra, A. (2004). Codes of good governance worldwide: what is the trigger? Organization Studies, 25(3), 415?443. doi: 10.1177/0 17084 0604040669.
• Ahmed, A., Higgs, H., Ng, C., & Delaney, D. A. (2018). Determinants of women representation on corporate boards: evidence from Australia. Accounting Research Journal, 31(3), 26?342. doi: 10.1108/ARJ-11-2015-0133.
• Allemand, I., Barbe, O., & Brullebaut, B. (2014). Institutional theory and gender diversity on European boards. Vie & Sciences de l?entreprise, 198(2), 73?92. doi: 10.3917/vse.198.0073.
• Bear, S., Rahman, N., & Post, C. (2010). The impact of board diversity and gender composition on corporate social responsibility and firm reputation. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(2), 207?221. doi: 10.1007/s10551-010-0505-2.
• Best Practice of GPW Listed Companies 2016. Warsaw Stock Exchange. Retrieved from https://www.gpw.pl/pub/GPW/o-nas/DPSN2016_EN.pdf (12.09.2018).
• Bohdanowicz, L. (2015). The impact of ownership structure on supervisory board size and diversity: evidence from the Polish two-tier board model. Procedia Economics and Finance, 23, 1420?1425. doi: 10.1016/s2212-5671(15)00429-3.
• Brazzel, M. (2003). Historical and theoretical roots of diversity management. In D. L. Plummer (Ed.). Handbook of diversity management: beyond awareness to competency based learning. Lanham, MD: University Press of America, Inc.
• Cabeza-García, L., Del Brio, E. B., & Rueda, C. (2019). Legal and cultural factors as catalysts for promoting women in the boardroom. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 22(1), 56?67. doi: 10.1016/j.brq.2018.06.004.
• Carter, D. A., Simkins, B. J., & Simpson, W. G. (2003). Corporate governance, board diversity, and firm value. Financial Review, 38(1), 33?53. doi: 10.1111/1 540-6288.00034.
• Charles A., Redor E., & Zopounidis, E. (2015). The determinants of the existence of a critical mass of women on boards: a discriminant analysis. Economics Bulletin, 35(3), 1809?1819.
• Code of Best Practice of WSE Listed Companies (2013). Warsaw Stock Exchange. Retrieved from https://www.gpw.pl/pub/files/PDF/foldery/dobre_praktyki_GP W.pdf (15.03.2018).
• De Cleyn, S. H. (2008). Compliance of companies with corporate governance codes: case study on listed Belgian. Journal of Business Systems, Governance and Ethics, 3(1), 1?16. doi: 10.15209/jbsge.v3i1.127.
• DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited?: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147?160
• Directive 2014/95/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2014 amending Directive 2013/34/EU as regards disclosure of non-financial and diversity information by certain large undertakings and groups. Text with EEA relevance. (Official Journal of the European Union L330/1).
• EC (2012). Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on improving the gender balance among non-executive directors of companies listed on stock exchanges and related measures. COM(2012) 0614 final. Retrieved from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:52012 PC0614 (20.09.2018).
• Geiger, S., & Marlin, D. (2012). The relationship between organizational/board characteristics and the extent of female representation on corporate boards. Journal of Managerial Issues, 24(2), 157?172
• Hillman, A. J., Shropshire, C., & Cannella, A. A. (2007). Organizational predictors of women on corporate boards. Academy of Management Journal, 50(4), 941? 952. doi: 10.5465/amj.2007.26279222.
• Hillman, A. J., Withers, M. C., & Collins, B. J. (2009). Resource dependence theory: a review. Journal of Management, 35(6), 1404?1427. doi: 10.1177/014920 6309343469.
• Isidro, H., & Sobral, M. (2015). The effects of women on corporate boards on firm value, financial performance, and ethical and social compliance. Journal of Business Ethics, 132(1), 1?19. doi: 10.1007/s10551-014-2302-9.
• Kang, H. , Cheng, M., & Gray, S. J. (2007). Corporate governance and board composition: diversity and independence of Australian boards. Corporate Governance: an International Review, 15(2), 194?207. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-868 3.2007.005 54.x.
• Kanter, R. M. (1977). Some effects of proportions on group life: skewed sex ratios and responses to token women. American Journal of Sociology, 82(5), 965?990. doi: 10.1086/226425.
• Klettner, A. (2016). Corporate governance codes and gender diversity: management-based regulation in action. UNSW Law Journal, 39(2), 715?739.
• Koładkiewicz, I. (2017). The quality of explanations for deviation from principles of corporate governance: an introduction. Journal of Management and Business Administration. Central Europe, 25(3), 34?54. doi: 10.7206/jmba.ce.2450-7814 .202.
• Konrad, A. M., Kramer, V. W., & Erkut, S. (2008). Critical mass: the impact of three or more women on corporate boards. Organizational Dynamics, 37(2), 145?164. doi: 10.1016/j.orgdyn.2008.02.005.
• Liu, C. (2018). Are women greener? Corporate gender diversity and environmental violations. Journal of Corporate Finance, 52(C), 118?142. doi: 10.1016/j.jcorp fin.2018.08 .004.
• Martín-Ugedo, J. F., & Minguez-Vera, A. (2014). Firm performance and women on the board: evidence from the Spanish small and medium size companies. Feminist Economics, 20(3), 136?162. doi: 10.1080/13545701.2014.895404.
• Meyer, J., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340?363. doi: 10.1 086/2265 50.
• Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: a resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper & Row.
• Rao, K. & Tilt, C. (2016) Board composition and corporate social responsibility: the role of diversity, gender, strategy and decision making. Journal of Business Ethics, 138(2), 327?347. doi: 10.1007/s10551-015-2613-5.
• Regulation of the Minister of Finance of 25 May 2016 amending the Regulation on current and periodic information provided by issuers of securities and conditions for recognizing as equivalent information required by the laws of a non-member state (Journal of Laws of 15.06.2016, item 860).
• Robinson, G. & Dechant, K. (1997). Building a business case for diversity. Academy of Management Executive, 11(3), 21?31. doi: 10.5465/ame.1997.97 092316 61.
• Saeed, A., Belghitar, Y., & Yousaf, A. (2016). Firm-level determinants of gender diversity in the boardrooms: evidence from some emerging markets. International Business Review, 25(5), 1076?1088. doi: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2016. 01.002.
• Tagesson, T., & Collin, S. O. Y. (2015). Corporate governance influencing compliance with the Swedish Code of Corporate Governance. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 13(3), 262?277. doi: 10.1057/jdg.2015.15.
• Ujunwa, A., Nwakoby, I., & Ugbam, C. O. (2012). Corporate board diversity and firm performance: evidence from Nigeria. Corporate Ownership and Control, 9(2 Continued 1), 216?226. doi: 10.22495/cocv9i2c1art6.
• Yasser, Q. R., Al Mamun, A., & Ahmed, I. (2017). Corporate social responsibility and gender diversity: insights from Asia Pacific. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 24(3), 210?221. doi: 10.1002/ csr.1400.
• Zattoni, A., & Cuomo, F. (2008). Why adopt codes of good governance? A comparison of institutional and efficiency perspectives. Corporate Governance: an International Review, 16(1), 1?15. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8683.2008.00661.x.

Identifiers

DOI

10.24136/eq.2021.022

Biblioteka Nauki

22444320