Is internationalisation beneficial for novice internationalisers? The performance effects of firm-specific advantages, internationalisation degree and firm size revisited

• Authors: Krystian Barłożewski , Piotr Trąpczyński

Abstracts

EN

Research background: Research on the performance outcomes of different forms of internationalisation has attracted significant attention due to its theoretical and practical relevance. Still, the related findings have remained conflicting. Scholars have argued that companies need to possess or acquire firm-specific advantages (FSAs) to succeed internationalisation. However, a significant part of International Business (IB) research has treated FSAs as enablers of internationalisation, while some have argued that internationalisation in itself only helps firms translate the possessed resources into performance. Purpose of the article: The objective of this study, which is based on the resource-based view (RBV), is to explore the moderating effect of internationalisation on the relationship between FSAs and performance, considering internationalisation degree and firm size as boundary conditions for that relationship. Methods: We carry out statistical analyses on a longitudinal dataset containing 304 novice internationalisers from the post-transition economy of Poland and a total of 1167 firm-year observations. Thereby, we compare SMEs with large firms. Findings & value added: We find that while FSAs do positively affect firm performance, this relationship becomes weaker for higher levels of internationalisation. However, the negative moderating effect of the internationalisation degree becomes weaker for larger novice internationalisers, which are more able to handle the complexity of managing foreign operations.

Keywords

EN

firm internationalization; multinationality; firm performance; Central and Eastern Europe; firm-specific advantages

• Publisher: Instytut Badań Gospodarczych
• Journal: Oeconomia Copernicana
• Year: 2021
• Volume: 12
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 53-75

Dates

published

2021

Contributors

author

Krystian Barłożewski

• Warsaw School of Economics

• https://orcid.org/0000000270500962

author

Piotr Trąpczyński

• Poznań University of Economics and Business

• https://orcid.org/0000000181549174

References

• Aaby, N. E., & Slater, S. F. (1989). Management influences on export performance: a review of the empirical literature 1978-88. International Marketing Review, 6(4), 7-26. doi: 10.1108/EUM0000000001516.
• Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120. doi: 10.1016/S0742-3322(00)17018-4.
• Bartlett, C. G., & Ghoshal, S. (1989). Managing across borders: the transnational solution. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
• Bausch, A., & Krist, M. (2007). The effect of context-related moderators on the internationalization-performance relationship: evidence from meta-analysis. Management International Review, 47(3), 319?347. doi: 10.1007/s11575-007-0019-z.
• Berry, H., & Kaul, A. (2016). Replicating the multinationality?performance relationship: is there an S-curve? Strategic Management Journal, 37(11), 2275-2290. doi: 10.1002/smj.2567.
• Chen, J., Sousa, C. M., & He, X. (2016). The determinants of export performance: a review of the literature 2006-2014. International Marketing Review, 33(5), 626?670. doi: 10.1108/imr-10-2015-0212.
• Chiao, Y. C., Yu, C. M. J., Li, P. Y., & Chen, Y. C. (2008). Subsidiary size, internationalization, product diversification, and performance in an emerging market. International Marketing Review, 25(6), 612-633. doi: 10.1108/02651330810915556.
• Cuervo-Cazurra, A., & Genc, M. (2008). Transforming disadvantages into advantages: developing-country MNEs in the least developed countries. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(6), 957-979. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8 400390.
• Cui, L., & Jiang, F. (2010). Behind ownership decision of Chinese outward FDI: resources and institutions. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 27(4), 751-774. doi: 10.1007/s10490-009-9136-5.
• Dhanaraj, C., & Beamish, P. W. (2003). A resource-based approach to the study of export performance. Journal of Small Business Management, 41(3), 242?261. doi: 10.1111/1540-627X.00080.
• Dittfeld, M. (2017). Multinationality and performance: a context-specific analysis for German firms. Management International Review, 57(1), 1-35. doi: 10.100 7/s11575-016-0286-7.
• Dougherty, C. (2011). Introduction to econometrics. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Dunning, J. H. (2001). The eclectic (OLI) paradigm of international production: past, present and future. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 8(2), 173-190. doi: 10.1080/13571510110051441.
• Dunning, J. H., Kim, C., & Park, D. (2008). Old wine in new bottles: a comparison of emerging-market TNCs today and developed-country TNCs thirty years ago. The rise of transnational corporations from emerging markets: Threat or opportunity. In K. P. Sauvant (Ed.). The rise of transnational corporations from emerging markets. Threat or opportunity? Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 158?182.
• Filatotchev, I., & Piesse, J. (2009). R&D, internationalization and growth of newly listed firms: European evidence. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(8), 1260-1276. doi: 10.1057/jibs.2009.18.
• Furlan, A., & Grandinetti, R. (2011). Size, relationships and capabilities: a new approach to the growth of the firm. Human Systems Management, 30(4), 195-213. doi: 10.3233/HSM-2011-0749.
• Gande, A., Schenzler, C., & Senbet, L. W. (2009). Valuation effects of global diversification. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(9), 1515-1532. doi: 10.1057/s41267-017-0142-4.
• Geleilate, J. M. G., Magnusson, P., Parente, R. C., & Alvarado-Vargas, M. J. (2016). Home country institutional effects on the multinationality-performance relationship: a comparison between emerging and developed market multinationals. Journal of International Management, 22(4), 380-402. doi: 10.1016/j.i ntman.2016.06.001.
• Glaum, M., & Oesterle, M. J. (2007). 40 years of research on internationalization and firm performance: more questions than answers? Management International Review, 47(3), 307-317. doi: 10.1007/s11575-007-0018-0.
• Hennart, J. F. (2011). A theoretical assessment of the empirical literature on the impact of multinationality on performance. Global Strategy Journal, 1(1-2), 135-151. doi: 10.1002/gsj.8.
• Hennart, J. F. (2012). Emerging market multinationals and the theory of the multinational enterprise. Global Strategy Journal, 2(3), 168-187. doi: 10.1057/978-1-349-94848-2_747-1.
• Hitt, M. A., Hoskisson, R. E., & Kim, H. (1997). International diversification: effects on innovation and firm performance in product-diversified firms. Academy of Management Journal, 40(4), 767-798. doi: 10.5465/256948.
• Hoskisson, R. E., Wright, M., Filatotchev, I., & Peng, M. W. (2013). Emerging multinationals from mid-range economies: the influence of institutions and factor markets. Journal of Management Studies, 50(7), 1295-1321. doi: 10.1111/j. 1467-6486.2012.01085.x.
• Kim, M., Mahoney, J. T., & Tan, D. (2015). Re-conceptualising exploitative and explorative FDI: a balancing-process approach to firm internationalisation. European Journal of International Management, 9(5), 537-565. doi: 10.1504/EJI M.2015.071513.
• Kirca, A. H., Roth, K., Hult, G. T. M., & Cavusgil, S. T. (2012). The role of context in the multinationality-performance relationship: a meta-analytic review. Global Strategy Journal, 2(2), 108-121. doi: 10.1002/gsj.1032.
• Kotabe, M., Srinivasan, S. S., & Aulakh, P. S. (2002). Multinationality and firm performance: the moderating role of R&D and marketing capabilities. Journal of International Business Studies, 33(1), 79-97. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.849 1006.
• Li, L. (2007). Multinationality and performance: a synthetic review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(2), 117-139. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00205.x.
• López-Morales, J. S., & Gómez-Casas, M. M. (2014). Degree of internationalization (DOI) and performance relationship: an empirical and conceptual approach. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 4(9), 39-56. doi: 10.6007/IJARBSS/v4-i9/1128.
• Majocchi, A., Bacchiocchi, E., & Mayrhofer, U. (2005). Firm size, business experience and export intensity in SMEs: a longitudinal approach to complex relationships. International Business Review, 14(6), 719-738. doi: 10.1016/j.ibusre v.2005.07.004.
• Mathews, J. A. (2006). Dragon multinationals: new players in 21 st century globalization. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 23(1), 5-27. doi: 10.1007/s10490 -006-7161-1.
• Matysiak, L., & Bausch, A. (2012). Antecedents of MNE performance: blinded by the obvious in 35 years of literature. Multinational Business Review, 20(2), 178-211. doi: 10.1108/15253831211238230.
• Mitchell, W., Capron, L., & Anand, J. (2007). Acquisition-based dynamic capabilities. In C. E. Helfat (Ed.). Dynamic capabilities: understanding strategic change in organizations. Oxford: Blackwell, 80-99.
• Mittelstaedt, J. D., Harben, G. N., & Ward, W. A. (2003). How small is too small? Firm size as a barrier to exporting from the United States. Journal of Small Business Management, 41(1), 68-84. doi: 10.1111/1540-627X.00067.
• Morck, R., & Yeung, B. (1991). Why investors value multinationality. Journal of Business, 64(2), 165-187. doi: 10.1086/296532.
• Nadkarni, S., & Perez, P. D. (2007). Prior conditions and early international commitment: the mediating role of domestic mindset. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(1), 160-176. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400248.
• Ogasavara, M. H. (2010). The role of experiential knowledge and subsequent investment decisions on the profitability of Japanese companies in Brazil. BAR-Brazilian Administration Review, 7(1), 59-78. doi: 10.1590/S1807-7692201000 0100005.
• Ogasavara, M. H., & Hoshino, Y. (2007). The impact of ownership, internalization, and entry mode on Japanese subsidiaries? performance in Brazil. Japan and the World Economy, 19(1), 1-25. doi: 10.1016/j.japwor.2005.06.001.
• Peng, M. W. (2001). The resource-based view and international business. Journal of Management, 27(6), 803-829. doi: 10.1177/014920630102700611.
• Penrose, E. T. (1959). The theory of the growth of the firm. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
• Peteraf, M. A. (1993). The cornerstones of competitive advantage: a resource?based view. Strategic Management Journal, 14(3), 179-191. doi: 10.1002/smj. 4250140303.
• Phelps, R., Adams, R., & Bessant, J. (2007). Life cycles of growing organizations: a review with implications for knowledge and learning. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(1), 1-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00200.x.
• Piercy, N. F., Kaleka, A., & Katsikeas, C. S. (1998). Sources of competitive advantage in high performing exporting companies. Journal of World Business, 33(4), 378-393. doi: 10.1016/S1090-9516(98)90023-2.
• Ramamurti, R. (2009). Why study emerging-market multinationals? In R. Ramamurti & J. V. Singh (Eds.). Emerging multinationals in emerging markets. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 3-22.
• Rugman, A. (2009). Theoretical aspects of MNEs from emerging countries. In R. Ramamurti & J. V. Singh, (Eds.). Emerging multinationals in emerging markets. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 42-63.
• Rugman, A. M., & Oh, C. H. (2011). Methodological issues in the measurement of multinationality of US firms. Multinational Business Review, 19(3), 202-212. doi: 10.1108/15253831111172630.
• Rugman, A. M., & Verbeke, A. (2008). Internalization theory and its impact on the field of international business. In International business scholarship: AIB fellows on the first 50 years and beyond. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 155-174.
• Rundh, B. (2007). International marketing behaviour amongst exporting firms. European Journal of Marketing, 41(1/2), 181-198. doi: 10.1108/030905607107 18175.
• Schwens, C., & Kabst, R. (2009). How early opposed to late internationalizers learn: experience of others and paradigms of interpretation. International Business Review, 18(5), 509-522. doi: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2009.06.001.
• Shin, J., Mendoza, X., Hawkins, M. A., & Choi, C. (2017). The relationship between multinationality and performance: knowledge-intensive vs. capital-intensive service micro-multinational enterprises. International Business Review, 26(5), 867-880. doi: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2017.02.005.
• Svetličič, M., & Jaklič, A. (2003). Outward FDI by transition economies: basic features, trends and development implications. In M. Svetličič & M. Rojec (Eds.). Facilitating transition by internationalisation: outward direct investment from Central European Economies in Transition. Ashgate, Aldershot, 49-76.
• Tallman, S., & Li, J. (1996). Effects of international diversity and product diversity on the performance of multinational firms. Academy of Management Journal, 39(1), 179-196. doi: 10.2307/256635.
• Teece, D. J. (2006). Reflections on the Hymer thesis and the multinational enterprise. International Business Review, 15(2), 124-139. doi: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.20 05.11.003.
• Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533. doi: 10.1002/(SI CI)1097-0266(199708)18:73.0.CO;2-Z.
• Trąpczyński, P., & Gorynia, M. (2017). A double-edged sword? The moderating effects of control on firm capabilities and institutional distance in explaining foreign affiliate performance. International Business Review, 26(4), 697-709. doi: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2016.12.009.
• Trąpczyński, P. (2013). Determinants of foreign direct investment performance?a critical literature review. Oeconomia Copernicana, 4(2), 117-132. doi: 10.12775/OeC.2013.016.
• Verbeke, A., & Brugman, P. (2009). Triple-testing the quality of multinationality?performance research: an internalization theory perspective. International Business Review, 18(3), 265-275. doi: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2009.01.005.
• Verbeke, A., Li, L., & Goerzen, A. (2009). Toward more effective research on the multinationality-performance relationship. Management International Review, 49(2), 149-161. doi: 10.1007/s11575-008-0133-6.
• Wagner, J. (2001). A note on the firm size-export relationship. Small Business Economics, 17(4), 229-237. doi: 10.1023/A:1012202405889.
• Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171-180. doi: 10.1002/smj.4250050207.
• Williamson, P. J., & Zeng, M. (2009). Chinese multinationals: emerging through new global gateways. In R. Ramamurti & J. V. Singh (Eds.). Emerging multinationals in emerging markets. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 81-109.
• Woodcock, C. P., Beamish, P. W., & Makino, S. (1994). Ownership-based entry mode strategies and international performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 25(2), 253-273. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490200.
• Xia, Y., Qiu, Y., & Zafar, A. U. (2007). The impact of firm resources on subsidiary's competitiveness in emerging markets: an empirical study of Singaporean SMEs' performance in China. Multinational Business Review, 15(2), 13-40. doi: 10.1108/1525383X200700006.

Identifiers

DOI

10.24136/oc.2021.003

Biblioteka Nauki

19233621