Social benefits of solar energy: Evidence from Bangladesh

• Authors: Gazi Salah Uddin , Chowdhury Abdullah-Al-Baki , Donghyun Park , Ali Ahmed , Shu Tian

Abstracts

EN

Research background: The Bangladeshi government has set a plan to generate one-tenth of its electricity from solar and other renewable sources by 2030. Solar adoption surged in Bangladesh up until 2015, setting a global precedent for electrifying areas that were previously unconnected. The enhanced lighting offered by solar systems provides immediate benefits, including additional hours for household and business activities and extended study hours for school-going children. Purpose of the article: This study seeks to identify the determinants and welfare gains of solar adoption in rural areas by analysing three rounds of the Bangladesh Integrated Household Survey from 2011–12, 2015, and 2018–19. In addition to presenting new estimates of economic, environmental, and educational welfare gains, our research offers insights into how solar adoption relates to rural employment and the nutrition of children under five. Methods: We utilized both ordinary least squares and propensity score matching techniques to estimate the welfare effects of solar adoption. Only households that do not use electricity as their primary lighting source, such as those relying on solar or kerosene, are considered in our sample. Findings & value added: We have discovered that adopting solar is linked to higher income, increased expenditure, and growth in asset value. Additionally, there is a significant reduction in kerosene expenditure among adopters compared to non-adopters. Other observations reveal that households with solar setups tend to transition from sharecropping to trading and poultry farming. Children in these households also benefit from solar adoption in terms of education and nutrition. This study illustrates how solar energy can effectively address various welfare concerns in areas where the government cannot supply electricity. Given that recent global events have rendered underdeveloped countries more vulnerable to providing consistent electricity to their entire populations, this research suggests solar energy as a resilient electrification solution during crises.

Keywords

EN

energy transition; solar adaption; clean energy; education; welfare; Bangladesh

• Publisher: Instytut Badań Gospodarczych
• Journal: Oeconomia Copernicana
• Year: 2023
• Volume: 14
• Issue: 3
• Pages: 861-897

Dates

published

2023

Contributors

author

Gazi Salah Uddin

• Linköping University

• https://orcid.org/0000000257440192

author

Chowdhury Abdullah-Al-Baki

• Linköping University
• Shahjalal University of Science and Technology

• https://orcid.org/0000000298113016

author

Donghyun Park

• Asian Development Bank

• https://orcid.org/0000000331866061

author

Ali Ahmed

• Linköping University
• The Ratio Institute, Sweden

• https://orcid.org/0000000217988284

author

Shu Tian

• Asian Development Bank

• https://orcid.org/0000000290496673

References

• Aarakit, S. M., Ntayi, J. M., Wasswa, F., Adaramola, M. S., & Ssennono, V. F. (2021). Adoption of solar photovoltaic systems in households: Evidence from Uganda. Journal of Cleaner Production, 329, 129619.
• Abu Saim, Md., & Khan, I. (2021). Problematizing solar energy in Bangladesh: Benefits, burdens, and electricity access through solar home systems in remote islands. Energy Research & Social Science, 74.
• Ahmed, A. (2013). Bangladesh Integrated Household Survey (BIHS) 2011–2012. Washington: International Food Policy Research Institute.
• Bangladesh Planning Commission (2022). Sustainable development goals: Bangladesh Progress report 2022. Dhaka, Bangladesh. Retrieved from https://gedkp.gov.bd/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/SDGs-Progress-Report-2022-Final-output-file-1-February-2023-Full-book_compressed.pdf?post_id=3032#:~:text=As%20per%20the%20SDG%20index,our%20commitments%20to%20attaining%20SDGs.
• Best, R. (2023). Assets power solar and battery uptake in Kenya. Energy Economics, 123, 106723.
• Best, R., & Chareunsy, A. (2022). The impact of income on household solar panel uptake: Exploring diverse results using Australian data. Energy Economics, 112, 106124.
• Best, R., Nepal, R., & Saba, N. (2021). Wealth effects on household solar uptake: Quantifying multiple channels. Journal of Cleaner Production, 297, 126618.
• Biswas, A. K., Sajjakulnukit, B., & Rakkwamsuk, P. (2014). Subsidy policy instruments for rapid growth of photovoltaic electricity generation in Bangladesh. Energy Procedia, 52.
• Buragohain, T. (2012). Impact of solar energy in rural development in India. International Journal of Environmental Science and Development, 3(4), 334–338.
• Cabraal, A., Ward, W. A., Bogach, V. S., & Jain, A. (2021). Living in the light: The Bangladesh solar home systems story. Washington: World Bank.
• Crago, C. L., Grazier, E., & Breger, D. (2023). Income and racial disparities in financial returns from solar PV deployment. Energy Economics, 117, 106409.
• Hancevic, P. I., & Sandoval, H. H. (2023). Solar panel adoption among Mexican small and medium-sized commercial and service businesses. Energy Economics, 126, 106979.
• IFPRI (2016). Bangladesh integrated household survey (BIHS) 2015. Washington: International Food Policy Research Institute.
• IFPRI (2020). Bangladesh integrated household survey (BIHS) 2018-2019. Washington: International Food Policy Research Institute.
• Jacksohn, A., Grösche, P., Rehdanz, K., & Schröder, C. (2019). Drivers of renewable technology adoption in the household sector. Energy Economics, 81, 216–226.
• Jacobson, A. (2007). Connective power: Solar electrification and social change in Kenya. World Development, 35(1), 144–162.
• Kabir, E., Kim, K.-H., & Szulejko, J. (2017). Social impacts of solar home systems in rural areas: A case study in Bangladesh. Energies, 10(10), 1615.
• Khan, I. (2019). Drivers, enablers, and barriers to prosumerism in Bangladesh: A sustainable solution to energy poverty? Energy Research & Social Science, 55, 82–92.
• Khandker, S. R., Samad, H. A., Ali, R., & Barnes, D. F. (2014a). Who benefits most from rural electrification? Evidence in India. Energy Journal, 35(2), 75–96.
• Khandker, S. R., Samad, H. A., Sadeque, Z. K. M., Asaduzzaman, M., Yunus, M., & Haque, A. K. E. (2014b). Surge in solar-powered homes: Experience in off-grid rural Bangladesh. The World Bank.
• Komatsu, S., Kaneko, S., Ghosh, P. P., & Morinaga, A. (2013). Determinants of user satisfaction with solar home systems in rural Bangladesh. Energy, 61, 52–58.
• Komatsu, S., Kaneko, S., Shrestha, R. M., & Ghosh, P. P. (2011). Nonincome factors behind the purchase decisions of solar home systems in rural Bangladesh. Energy for Sustainable Development, 15(3), 284–292.
• Liao, C., Fei, D., Huang, Q., Jiang, L., & Shi, P. (2021). Targeted poverty alleviation through photovoltaic-based intervention: Rhetoric and reality in Qinghai, China. World Development, 137, 105117.
• Mishra, P., & Behera, B. (2016). Socio-economic and environmental implications of solar electrification: Experience of rural Odisha. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 56, 953–964.
• Obeng, G. Y., Akuffo, F. O., Braimah, I., Evers, H.-D., & Mensah, E. (2008). Impact of solar photovoltaic lighting on indoor air smoke in off-grid rural Ghana. Energy for Sustainable Development, 12(1), 55–61.
• Pueyo, A., & DeMartino, S. (2018). The impact of solar mini-grids on Kenya’s rural enterprises. Energy for Sustainable Development, 45, 28–37.
• Rahman, S. M., & Ahmad, M. M. (2013). Solar home system (SHS) in rural Bangladesh: Ornamentation or fact of development? Energy Policy, 63, 348–354.
• Samad, H. A., Khandker, S. R., Asaduzzaman, M., & Yunusd, M. (2013). The benefits of solar home systems: An analysis from Bangladesh. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, 6724.
• Schulte, E., Scheller, F., Sloot, D., & Bruckner, T. (2022). A meta-analysis of residential PV adoption: The important role of perceived benefits, intentions and antecedents in solar energy acceptance. Energy Research & Social Science, 84, 102339.
• Sharif, I., & Mithila, M. (2013). Rural electrification using PV: The success story of Bangladesh. Energy Procedia, 33, 343–354.
• Stock, R. (2021). Bright as night: Illuminating the antinomies of ‘gender positive’ solar development. World Development, 138, 105196.
• Urpelainen, J. (2016). Energy poverty and perceptions of solar power in marginalized communities: Survey evidence from Uttar Pradesh, India. Renewable Energy, 85, 534–539.
• Wagner, N., Rieger, M., Bedi, A. S., Vermeulen, J., & Demena, B. A. (2021). The impact of off-grid solar home systems in Kenya on energy consumption and expenditures. Energy Economics, 99, 105314.
• Wijayatunga, P. D. C., & Attalage, R. A. (2005). Socio-economic impact of solar home systems in rural Sri Lanka: A case-study. Energy for Sustainable Development, 9(2), 5–9.
• Zander, K. K. (2020). Unrealised opportunities for residential solar panels in Australia. Energy Policy, 142, 111508.

Identifiers

DOI

10.24136/oc.2023.026

Biblioteka Nauki

19905143