Motives for Combining Motherhood with Employment: Evidence for Medium and Highly Educated Polish Women Around the EU Accession

• Authors: Anna Matysiak , Monika Mynarska

Abstracts

EN

This article provides insights into employment decisions of mothers and mothers-to-be in a post-socialist Poland around the entry to the EU. Previous studies for this country continuously pointed to a strong determination among mothers to be employed during the economic transformation, despite increasing obstacles to combining paid work with childrearing over the 1990s. We analyse in-depth interviews to explore women's motives to work for pay. We investigate how these motives are related to women's childbearing experiences and intentions. Our analyses show that motherhood was central in women's lives at this point in Polish history, but females sought to combine it with employment. We also find that women's perceptions about their ability to balance work and motherhood were strongly related to the meanings that they attached to paid work.

Keywords

EN

fertility; women's labour force participation; motives for work; qualitative interviews; transition economies; Central and Eastern Europe

• Publisher: Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydział Nauk Ekonomicznych
• Journal: Central European Economic Journal
• Year: 2021
• Volume: 8
• Issue: 55

Dates

published

2021

Contributors

author

Anna Matysiak

• Faculty of Economic Sciences University of Warsaw Poland

author

Monika Mynarska

• Institute of Psychology Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University in Warsaw Poland

References

• Baizan, P., Arpino, B., & Delclòs, C. E. (2016). The effect of gender policies on fertility: The moderating role of education and normative context. European Journal of Population, 32(1), 1–30.
• Balcerzak-Paradowska, B., Chłoń-Domińczak, A., Kotowska, I. E., Olejniczuk-Merta, A., Topińska, I., & Wóycicka, I. (2003). The gender dimensions of social security reform in Poland. In E. Fultz, M. Ruck, & S. Steinhilber (Eds.), The Gender Dimensions of Social Security Reform in Central and Eastern Europe: Case Studies of the Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland. (pp. 187–313). Budapest: ILO Subregional Office for Central and Eastern Europe.
• Baranowska-Rataj, A., & Matysiak, A. (2016). The causal effects of the number of children on female employment – do European institutional and gender conditions matter? Journal of Labor Research, 37(3), 343–367.
• Bernardi, L., Klarner, A., & von der Lippe, H. (2008). Job insecurity and the timing of parenthood: A comparison between eastern and western Germany. European Journal of Population, 24(3), 287–313, doi: 10.1007/s10680-007-9127-5.
• Bielby, D. D., & Bielby, W. T. (1984). Work commitment, sex-role attitudes, and women's employment. American Sociological Review, 49, 234–247.
• Bielby, D. D., & Bielby, W. T. (1988). She works hard for the money: Household responsibilities and the allocation of work effort. American Journal of Sociology, 93, 1031–1059.
• Bielby, W. T., & Bielby, D. D. (1989). Family ties: Balancing commitments to work and family in dual earner households. American Sociological Review, 54, 776–789.
• Bigoness, W. J. (1988). Sex differences in job attribute preferences. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 9(2), 139–147.
• Billari, F. C. (2001). The analysis of early life courses: Complex descriptions of the transition to adulthood. Journal of Population Research, 18, 119–142.
• CBOS. (2013). Kobieta pracująca. Komunikat z Badań nr 28/2013. Warszawa, Poland: Centrum Badania Opini Publicznej.
• CBOS. (2018). Kobiety i mężczyźni na rynku pracy. Komunikat z badań nr 128/2018. Warszawa, Poland: Centrum Badania Opini Publicznej.
• Corrigall, E. A., & Konrad, A. M. (2006). The relationship of job attribute preferences to employment, hours of paid work, and family responsibilities: An analysis comparing women and men. Sex Roles, 54(1–2), 95–111.
• Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.
• Crompton, R. (2002). Employment, flexible working and the family. The British Journal of Sociology, 53, 537–558.
• Crompton, R., & Lyonette, C. (2005). The new gender essentialism – domestic and family ‘choices’ and their relation to attitudes. The British Journal of Sociology, 56, 601–620.
• Cukrowska-Torzewska, E., & Matysiak, A. (2020). The motherhood wage penalty: A meta-analysis. Social Science Research, Vol 88–89, Article 102416.
• Czapiński, J., & Panek, T. (2007). Diagnoza Społeczna 2007. Warunki i jakość życia Polaków. Warsaw, Poland: Rada Monitoringu Społecznego.
• Danziger, N., & Eden, Y. (2007). Gender-related differences in the occupational aspirations and career-style preferences of accounting students. Career Development International, 12(2), 129–149.
• Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2003). Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin, Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 1–45). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
• Duncan, S. (2005). Mothering, class and rationality. Sociological Review, 53, 50–76.
• Duncan, S., Edwards, R., Reynolds, T., & Alldred, P. (2003). Motherhood, paid work and partnering: Values and theories. Work, Employment & Society, 17, 309–330.
• Duncan, S., Edwards, R., Reynolds, T., & Alldred, P. (2004). Mothers and child care: Policies, values and theories. Children and Society, 18, 254–265.
• Eurostat. (2007). Reconciliation between work and family life in the European Union. Final report to the 2005 LFS ad hoc module. Eurostat Methodological working Papers. European Commission, Luxembourg.
• Frejka, T. (2008). Determinants of family formation and childbearing during the societal transition in Central and Eastern Europe. Demographic Research, 19, 139–170.
• Giza-Poleszczuk, A., & Poleszczuk, J. (2004). Partnership, marriage, and children – Cultural differentiation of attitudes. In A. Jasińska-Kania & M. Marody (Eds.). Poles among Europeans (pp. 199–228). Warsaw, Poland: Scholar.
• Glaser, B. G. (1965). The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. Social Problems, 12, 436–445.
• Gomułka, S. (2014). Transformacja Gospodarczo-Społeczna Polski 1989–2014 i Współczesne Wyzwania. Nauka, 3, 7–16.
• Greulich, A., Guergoat-Larivière, M., & Thévenon, O. (2017). Employment and second childbirths in Europe. Population, 72(4), 625–647.
• Gunkel, M., Lusk Edward, J., Wolff, B., & Li, F. (2007). Gender-specific effects at work: An empirical study of four countries. Gender, Work and Organization, 14(1), 56–79.
• Hakim, C. (2000). Work-lifestyle choices in the 21st century: Preference theory. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
• Harpaz, I., & Xuanning, F. (1997). Work centrality in Germany, Israel, Japan, and the United States. Cross-Cultural Research, 31(3), 171–200.
• Kalleberg, A. L. (1977). Work values and job rewards: A theory of job satisfaction. American Sociological Review, 42, 124–143.
• Kalleberg, A. L., & Stark, D. (1993). Career strategies in capitalism and socialism: Work values and job rewards in the United States and Hungary. Social Forces, 71(1), 181–198.
• Kantorová, V. (2004). Family life transitions of young women in a changing society: First union formation and birth of first child in the Czech Republic, 1970–1997. Charles University, Prague, p. 313.
• Konrad, A. M., Ritchie, J. E. Jr., Lieb, P., & Corrigall, E. (2000). Sex differences and similarities in job attribute preferences: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 126(4), 593.
• Kotowska, I. E., & Sztanderska, U. (2007). Zmiany demograficzne a zmiany na rynku pracy w Polsce. In I. E. Kotowska, U. Sztanderska, & I. Wóycicka (Eds.), Aktywność zawodowa i edukacyjna a obowiązki rodzinne w Polsce w świetle badań empirycznych (pp. 13–46). Warszawa, Poland: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.
• Kotowska, I. E., Józwiak, J., Matysiak, A., & Baranowska, A. (2008). Poland: fertility decline as a response to profound societal and labour market changes? Demographic Research, 19, 795–854.
• Kreyenfeld, M. (2004). Fertility decisions in the FRG and GDR: An analysis with data from the German Fertility and Family Survey. Demographic Research, 3, 275–318.
• LaRossa, R. (2012). Writing and reviewing manuscripts in the multidimensional world of qualitative research. Journal of Marriage and Family, 74, 643–659.
• Łobodzińska, B. (1983). Divorce in Poland: Its legislation, distribution and social context. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 45(4), 927–942.
• Marsden, P. V., Kalleberg, A. L., & Cook, C. R. (1993). Gender differences in organizational commitment: Influences of work positions and family roles. Work Occupation, 20, 368–390.
• Matysiak, A. (2009). Employment first, then childbearing: Women's strategy in post-socialist Poland. Population Studies, 63, 253–276.
• Matysiak, A. (2011). Interdependencies between fertility and women's labour supply (1st ed.). New York, NY: Springer.
• Matysiak, A., & Mynarska, M. (2020). Self-employment as a work-and-family reconciliation strategy? Evidence from Poland. Advances in Life Course Research, 45, 1–9.
• Matysiak, A., & Steinmetz, S. (2008). Finding their way? Female employment patterns in West Germany, East Germany, and Poland. European Sociological Review, 24, 331–345.
• Matysiak, A., & Vignoli, D. (2008). Fertility and women's employment: A meta-analysis. European Journal of Population, 24(4), 363–384.
• Matysiak, A., & Vignoli, D. (2013). Diverse effects of women's employment on fertility: Insights from Italy and Poland. European Journal of Population, 29(3), 273–302.
• Matysiak, A., & Węziak-Białowolska, D. (2016). Country-specific conditions for work and family reconciliation: An attempt at quantification. European Journal of Population, 32(4), 475–510.
• Matysiak, A., Słoczyński, T., & Baranowska, A. (2010). Kobiety i Mężczyźni Na Rynku Pracy [Women and Men on the Labour Market]. In M. Bukowski (Ed.), Zatrudnienie w Polsce 2008. Praca w cyklu życia. [Employment in Poland 2008. Work over the life cycle]. Warsaw, Poland: Institute of Structural Research, p. 105–143.
• Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
• Muszyńska, M. (2007). Structural and cultural determinants of fertility in Europe. Warsaw, Poland: Warsaw School of Economics Publishing.
• Mynarska, M. (2009). Individual fertility choices in Poland. Wydawnictwo Warszawa, Poland: Uniwersytetu Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego.
• Nieuwenhuis, R., Need, A., & Van Der Kolk, H. (2012). Institutional and demographic explanations of women's employment in 18 OECD Countries, 1975–1999. Journal of Marriage and Family, 74(3), 614–630.
• OECD Family Database. (2020). Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/social/family/database.htm (data extracted on 25.10.2020).
• OECD. (2017). The pursuit of gender equality. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
• Pascall, G., & Kwak, A. (2005). Gender regimes in transition in Central and Eastern Europe. Bristol, England: The Policy Press, University of Bristol.
• Pascall, G., & Manning, N. (2000). Gender and social policy: Comparing welfare states in Central and Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union. Journal of European Social Policy, 10(3), 240–266.
• Pongracz, M., & Spéder, Z. (2008). Attitudes towards forms of partnership. In C. Höhn, D. Avramov, & I. E. Kotowska (Eds.), People, population change and policies: Lessons from the population policy acceptance study (pp. 93–112). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
• Róbert, P., & Bukodi, E. E. (2005). The effects of the globalization process on the transition to adulthood in Hungary. In H. P. Blossfeld, E. Klijzing, M. Mills, & K. Kurz (Eds.), Globalization, uncertainty and youth in society (pp. 176–214). London and New York: Routledge.
• Rostgaard, T. (2004). Family support policies in Central and Eastern Europe – A decade and a half transition. Paris, France: UNESCO.
• Sharabi, M., & Harpaz, I. (2011). Gender and the relative centrality of major life domains: Changes over the course of time. Community, Work and Family, 14(1), 57–62.
• Stankuniene, V., & Maslauskaite, E. (2008). Family transformations in the post-socialist countries: Attitudes toward changes and the ideational shift. In C. Höhn, D. Avramov, & I. E. Kotowska (Eds.), People, population change and policies: lessons from the population policy acceptance study (pp. 113–137). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
• Szelewa, D. (2012). Childcare policies and gender relations in Eastern Europe: Hungary and Poland Compare. Harriet Taylor Mill-Institut für Ökonomie und Geschlechterforschung Discussion Paper, 17.
• Szyszka, M. (2016). Aktywność zawodowa w opinii pracujących kobiet. Annales I – Philosophy and Sociology, XLI(2), 103–122.
• Ukhova, D. (2020). Gender division of domestic labor in post-socialist Europe (1994–2012): Test of class gradients hypothesis. Social Inclusion, 8(4), 23–34.
• Warr, P. (2008). Work values: Some demographic and cultural correlates. Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology, 81(4), 751–775.
• Wiswall, M., & Zafar, B. (2018). Preference for the workplace, investment in human capital, and gender. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 133(1), 457–507.
• Zoch, G., & Hondralis, I. (2017). The expansion of low-cost, state-subsidized childcare availability and mothers. Return-to-work behaviour in East and West Germany. European Sociological Review, 33(5), 693–707.

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/ceej-2021-0005

Biblioteka Nauki

1356516