State of Democracy in Poland versus Environmental Protection

• Authors: Agnieszka Markowska

Abstracts

EN

The paper starts with a review of literature focusing on links between democracy and environmental protection, pointing out a fair weight of scientific evidence that democratic societies on average enjoy a higher level of environmental quality than autocracies. It subsequently provides a quick insight into the recent trends in the state of democracy and the rule of law in Poland as well as a few examples of measures taken concerning environmental policy that have been undertaken after 2015. The paper concludes by expressing concern about certain negative patterns in the Polish environmental policy in the past few years, which seem to be connected to the deficiencies in the rule of law and democracy as observed in Poland. The shrinking space for civil society to participate in democratic governance concerning environmental issues and the excessive appetite of the current government for large infrastructural investments seem to be in contradiction with the European and global strive for sustainable development and tackling climate change. It remains to be seen if the recent negative trends in the Polish environmental policy will have a structural impact on the state of environment in Poland.

Keywords

EN

democracy; environmental policy; Poland; rule of law

• Publisher: Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydział Nauk Ekonomicznych
• Journal: Central European Economic Journal
• Year: 2021
• Volume: 8
• Issue: 55
• Pages: 219-230

Dates

published

2021

Contributors

author

Agnieszka Markowska

• Milieu Law & Policy Consulting Brussels, Belgium

References

• Bielecki, T. (2019, 20 September). Polska blokuje unijne porozumienie ws. klimatu. Co to oznacza? (Poland blocks EU Climate Pact. What does this mean?), Polityka. Retrieved from https://www.polityka.pl/tygodnikpolityka/swiat/1797484,1,polska-blokuje-unijne-porozumienie-ws-klimatu-co-to-oznacza.read.
• Bond., I., & Gostyńska-Jakubowska, A. (2020). Democracy and the rule of law: Failing partnership? Policy Brief. Retrieved from https://www.cer.eu/publications/archive/policy-brief/2020/democracy-and-rule-law-failing-partnership.
• Cabaj, O., & Łachacz, O. (2010). Demokracja Środowiskowa w Wybranych Państwach Europy Środkowej i Wschodniej na przykładzie implementacji postanowień Konwencji z Aarhus (Environmental Democracy in Selected Countries of Central and Eastern Europe on the example of implementation of the provisions of the Aarhus Convention) Polski Rocznik Praw Człowieka i Prawa Humanitarnego 1.
• Csaky, Z. (2020). Nations in Transit 2020: Dropping the Democratic Facade. Retrieved from https://freedomhouse.org/report/nations-transit/2020/dropping-democratic-facade.
• Diamond, L., & Morlino, L. (2016). The quality of democracy. In L. Diamond (Ed.), In Search of Democracy,. London, UK: Routledge. 33–45.
• Dryzek, J. S. (1987). Rational Ecology: Environment and Political Economy. Oxford, UK: Blackwell (in: Li and Reuveny, 2006).
• European Commission. (2017). Proposal for a Council Decision on the determination of a clear risk of a serious breach by the Republic of Poland of the rule of law, COM(2017) 835 final. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52017PC0835.
• European Commission. (2019). The EU's Rule of Law Toolbox. Retrieved form https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/rule_of_law_factsheet_1.pdf.
• European Parliament. (2020, 20 July). Interim Report on the proposal for a Council decision on the determination of a clear risk of a serious breach by the Republic of Poland of the rule of law. Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs. Retrieved from https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2020-0138_EN.html.
• Grzymała-Busse, A., Kuo, D., Fukuyama F., & McFaul, M. (2020, March). Global Populisms and their Challenges, Stanford University. Retrieved from https://fsi.stanford.edu/global-populisms/global-populisms-and-their-challenges.
• Gurgul, A. (2017). Koszmarny bilans ‘Lex Szyszko’. W pół roku wycięliśmy trzy miliony drzew (A nightmare balance sheet ‘Lex Szyszko’. In six months, we have cut down three million trees), Gazeta Wyborcza, 24 June 2017.
• Hall, M. (2017). Do Passages in the Bible Justify Cutting Down Forests? The Conversation. Retrieved from https://theconversation.com/do-passages-in-the-bible-justify-cutting-down-forests-76448#:~:text=The%20English%20Standard%20Version%20of.
• Hardin, G. (1968). The Tragedy of the Commons. Science, 162(3859), 1243–1248.
• Heilbronner, R. L. (1974). An Inquiry into the Human Prospect. London, UK: Calder & Boyars.
• Jendrośka, J. (2002, February). ‘Konwencja z Aarhus: geneza, status i kierunki rozwoju’ (Aarhus convention: genesis, status and directions of development), Centre for Ecological Law in Wrocław and Regional Environmental Center, Wrocław. Retrieved from https://docplayer.pl/9007639-Konwencja-z-aarhus-geneza-status-i-kierunki-rozwoju.html.
• Li, Q., & Reuveny, R. (2006). Democracy and Environmental Degradation : A Formal and Empirical Investigation. International Studies Quarterly 50 (December), 935–956.
• Macuk, R. (2020, March). Transformacja energetyczna w Polsce (Energy transformation in Poland), Forum Energii. Retrieved from https://www.teraz-srodowisko.pl/media/pdf/aktualnosci/8413-Transformacja-energetyczna-w-Polsce-edycja-2020.pdf.
• Midlarsky, M. (1998). Democracy and the environment: An empirical assessment. Journal of Peace Research, 35(3), 341–361 (in: Winslow 2005).
• Neumayer, E. (2002). Do Democracies Exhibit Stronger International Environmental Commitment ? A Cross-Country Analysis. Journal of Peace Research, 39, 139–164. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343302039002001.
• Paehlke, R. (1995). Environmental values for a sustainable society: The democratic challenge. In F. Fischer, & M. Black (Eds.), Greening Environmental Policy. New York: St. Martin Press (in: Winslow 2006).
• Paehlke, R. (1996). Environmental Challenges to Democratic Practice. In W. Lafferty and J. Meadowcroft (Eds.), Democracy and the Environment: Problems and Prospects, Cheltenham, U.K.: Edward Elgar (in: Li and Reuveny 2006).
• Payne, R. A. (1995). Freedom and the Environment. Journal of Democracy, 6(3), 41–55. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.1995.0053.
• Pickering, J., Bäckstrand, K., & Schlosberg, D. (2020). Between Environmental and Ecological Democracy: Theory and Practice at the Democracy-Environment Nexus. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning 22(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2020.1703276.
• Supreme Audit Office. (2018). Information about results of control. Usuwanie Drzew i Krzewów Oraz Zagospodarowanie Pozyskanego Drewna (‘Removal of trees and schrubs and management of harvested wood”). Retrieved from: https://www.nik.gov.pl/kontrole/P/18/046/.
• The First News (2020). Shipping Channel on Vistula Spit to give Poland Sovereignty – President. Retrieved from https://www.thefirstnews.com/article/shipping-channel-on-vistula-spit-to-give-poland-sovereignty–-president-13050.
• Trinomics (2020, October). Energy Costs, Taxes and the Impact of Government Interventions on Investments. Final Report for the European Commission.
• Węsławski, J. M., Goc, M., Stempniewicz, L. (2019, February). Przekop Mierzei: jak za jednym zamachem zaszkodzić Przyrodzie, stracić dużo pieniędzy i nie uzyskać nic w zamian (‘Channel through the Vistula Spit: how to damage nature, lose lots of money and achieve nothing’), Nauka dla Przyrody (Science for Nature). Retrieved from: https://naukadlaprzyrody.pl/2019/02/26/przekop-mierzei-jak-za-jednym-zamachem-zaszkodzic-przyrodzie-stracic-duzo-pieniedzy-i-nie-uzyskac-nic-w-zamian/.
• Winiecki, J. (2019, 23 October). Co się udało, a co nie w ochronie środowiska po ’89 r. (‘What has worked and what has not worked in environmental protection after 1989’), Polityka. Retrieved from: https://www.polityka.pl/tygodnikpolityka/nauka/1929394,1,co-sie-udalo-a-co-nie-w-ochronie-srodowiska-po-89-r.read.
• Winslow, M. (2005). Is Democracy Good for the Environment? Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 48(5), 771–783. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640560500183074.
• Woźniak, N. (2020, September). Głos krytyczny ws. ustawy futerkowej: „piątka dla zwierząt na dwójkę z plusem. To niepełna rewolucja‘ (A critical voice regarding fur legislation: five for animals scores two plus. It is not a full revolution’), OKO-PRESS. Retrieved from: https://oko.press/glos-krytyczny-ws-ustawy-futerkowej-piatka-dla-zwierzat-na-dwojke-z-plusem-to-niepelna-rewolucja/.
• Zerrahn, A. (2017). Wind Power and Externalities. Ecological Economics, 141, 245–260.

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/ceej-2021-0016

Biblioteka Nauki

1964876