Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2022 | 45 | 3 | 27-44

Article title

How to measure the success or failure rate of a new product strategy in competitive markets

Content

Title variants

Languages of publication

Abstracts

EN
This paper attempts to present a method for determining the level of goal achievement corresponding to a marketing strategy formulated for a new product launched in a competitive market. The research method used in this paper is a literature review in the area of new product development (NPD) and marketing strategy. The obtained scientific results indicate the importance of measurement of the effects of a new product strategy and provide various new metrics in this field. In practice, the author proposes useful indicators to measure the effects of a new product strategy in competitive markets. Given the economic and marketing implications of the study, its originality concerns the results that provide the basis for the improvement of company's efforts in effect measurement of a new product strategy and also marketing strategy in competitive markets. The present paper contains an overview of scientific works about new product competitiveness, and also proposes a modification of the method used to measure new product competitiveness on the marketplace. The research contribution to marketing sciences primarily includes the formulation of a set of real rates to measure success or fail rate of a new product strategy in a competitive market. The novelty of the research lies in the approach used to obtain quantitative parameters for evaluation of market competitiveness of a new product in various industries.

Year

Volume

45

Issue

3

Pages

27-44

Physical description

Dates

published
2022

Contributors

  • Department of Market Research and Services Management, Institute of Marketing, Poznań University of Economics and Business, Al. Niepodległości 10, 61-875 Poznań, Poland

References

  • Carboni, O. A., & Russu, P. (2018, March). Complementarity in product, process, and organizational innovation decisions: Evidence from European firms. R&D Management, 48(2), 210–222. doi:10.1111/radm.12284
  • Castellion, G., & Markham, S. K. (2013, September). Myths about new product failure rates perspective: New product failure rates: Influence of argumentum ad populum and self-interest. Journal of Product Innovation & Management, 30(5), 976–979. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5885.2012.01009.x
  • Commission Regulation (EC) No. 1450/2004 of 13 August 2004 implementing Decision No. 1608/2003/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the production and development of Community statistics on innovation. Retrieved from https://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2004:267:0032: 0035:EN:PDF
  • Cooper, R. G. (1993). Winning at new products. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
  • Cooper , R. G. (2002). Winning at new products. Accelerating the process from idea to lunch (3rd ed.). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
  • Cooper, R. G. (2017). Winning at new products: Creating value through innovation (5th ed.). New York, NY: Basic Books.
  • Cooper, R. G. (2019). The drivers of success in new-product development. Industrial Marketing Management, 76, 36–47.
  • Cooper, R. G. (2021). Accelerating innovation: Some lessons from the pandemic. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 38, 221–232. doi:10.1111/jpim.12565
  • Cooper R.G., Edgett, S.J.(2008). Maximizing productivity in product innovation, in: Research Technology Management, March 1.
  • Crawford, C. M. (1979, September). New product failure rates-Facts and fallicies. Research Management, 22, 9–13.
  • Engelman, R. M., Fracasso, E. M., Schmidt, S., & Zen, A. C. (2017). Intellectual capital, absorptive capacity and product innovation. Management Decision, 55(3), 474–490. doi:10.1108/MD-05-2016-0315
  • Gabrusewicz, W. (2014). Analiza finansowa przedsiębiorstwa, Teoria i zastosowanie. Warszawa, Poland: PWE.
  • Griffin, A., & Page, A. L. (1996, November). The PDMA success measurement project: Recommended measures for product development success and failure. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 16(6), 478–496. doi:10.1111/1540-5885.1360478
  • Grzegorczyk, T., & Głowiński, R. (2020). Patent management strategies: A review. Journal of Economics & Management, 40(2), 37–39. doi:10.22367/jem. 2020.40.02
  • Harrington, E. C. Jr. (1965). The desirability function. Industrial Quality Control, 21, 494–498.
  • Heij, C. V., Volberda, H. W., Van den Bosch, F. A. J., & Hollen, R. M. A. (2020). How to leverage the impact of R&D on product innovation? The moderating effect of management innovation (March 2020). R&D Management, 50(2), 277–294. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=3617110 or doi:10.1111/radm.12396
  • Hervas-Oliver, J. L., Sempere-Ripoll, F., Boronat-Moll, C., & Rojas-Alvarado, R. (2018). On the joint effect of technological and management innovations on performance: Increasing or diminishing returns? Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 30, 569–581. doi:10.1080/09537325.2017.1343462
  • House, C. H., & Price, R. L. (1991). The return map: Tracking product teams. Harvard Business Review, 69(1), 92–100. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/1991/01/the-return-maptrackingproduct-teams
  • Juchniewicz, M., & Grzybowska, B. (2010). Innowacyjność mikro przedsiębiorstw w Polsce. Warszawa, Poland: Polska Agencja Rozwoju Przedsiębiorczości.
  • Kasprzak, W., & Pelc, K. (2012). Innowacje, strategie techniczne i rozwojowe. Wrocław, Poland: Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Wrocławskiej.
  • Kirsner, S. (2015). What big companies get wrong about innovation metrics. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2015/05/what-big-companies-get-wrong-about-innovation-metrics
  • Lee, H., & Markham, S. K. (2016). PDMA comparative performance assessment study (CPAS): Methods and future research directions. Journal of Product Management, 33(S1), 3–19. Product Development & Management Association. doi:10.1111/jpim.12358
  • Mu, J., Thomas, E., Peng, G., & Di Benedetto, A. (2017, July). Strategic orientation and new product development performance: The role of networking capability and networking ability. Industrial Marketing Management, 64, 187–201.
  • OECD/Eurostat. (2018). Oslo manual 2018: Guidelines for collecting, reporting and using data on innovation (4th ed., The Measurement of Scientific, Technological and Innovation Activities). Paris, Luxembourg: OECD Publishing/Eurostat. doi:10.1787/ 9789264304604-en
  • Oral, M., & Kettani, O. (2009). Modelling firm competitiveness for strategy formulation. CIRRELT, 2009, 52, 1–39.
  • Reinertsen, D. G., & Smith, G. P. (2001). Developing products in half the time. New York, NY: Van Norstrand Reinhold.
  • Roostika, R., Wahyuningsih, T., & Haryono, S. (2015). The impacts of external competitiveness factors in the handicrafts industry. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 12(1), 166–176.
  • Rutkowski, I. P. (2007). Rozwój nowego produktu. Metody i uwarunkowania. Warszawa, Poland: Polskie Wydawnictwo Ekonomiczne.
  • Rutkowski, I. P. (2016). Metody innowacji produktu. Macierzowo-sieciowe metody pomiaru dojrzałości procesu innowacji produktu. Poznań, Poland: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Poznaniu.
  • Rutkowski, I. P. (2021). Competence measurement of production enterprises in product innovations for technological and marketing strategies. Journal of Economics & Management, 43, 114–134. doi:10.22367/jem.2021.43.06
  • Rutkowski, I. P. (2022). Success and failure rates of new food and non-food products introduced on the market. Journal of Marketing and Consumer Behaviour in Emerging Markets, 1(14), 52–61. doi:10.7172/2449-6634.jmcbem.2022.1.4
  • Shpak, N., Seliuchenko, N., Kharchuk, V., Kosar, N., & Sroka, W. (2019). Evaluation of product competitiveness: A case study analysis. Organizacija, 52(2), 107–125. doi:10.2478/orga-2019-0008
  • Stevens, Greg A. & Burley, James. (1997). 3,000 Raw Ideas = 1 Commercial Success!, Research-Technology Management, 40:3, 16–27, DOI: 10.1080/08956308.1997.11671126
  • Takei, F. (1985). Product competitiveness evaluation-Quantitative analysis for development strategy. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 28(2), 123–139. doi:10.1016/0040-1625(85)90010-1
  • Thompson, A. A. Jr., Peteraf, M. A., Gamble, J. E., & Strickland, A. J. III. (2016). Crafting and executing strategy-The quest for competitive advantage: Concepts and cases, 20th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
  • Tyunyukova, E., Ruban, V., & Burovtsev, V. (2018). Modern approaches to product competitiveness evaluation for companies of various industries. MATEC web of conferences polytransport systems doi:10.1051/matecconf/201821602016
  • Vashkiv, O. (2020). Product competitiveness and stages of its evaluation. Figshare. Thesis. doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.13084097.v1
  • Walker, R. (2013). Winning with risk management. Hackensack, NJ: World Scientific Publishing.
  • Wheelwright, S. C., & Clark, C. B. (1992). Revolutionizing product development. New York, NY: The Free Press.
  • Wodecka-Hyjek, A. (2013). Wybrane narzędzia pomiaru innowacyjności. Zeszyty Naukowe. Zarządzanie, 998, 63–82. doi:10.15678/ZNUEK.2013.0922.04
  • Wu, D. D., Kefan, X., Gang, C., & Ping, G. (2010). A risk analysis model in concurrent engineering product development. Risk Analysis, 30(9):1440–1453.
  • Zizlavsky, O. (2016). Innovation performance measurement: Research into Czech business practice. Economic Research, 29(1), 816–838. doi:10.1080/1331677 X.2016. 1235983

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

Biblioteka Nauki
11364543

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.ojs-doi-10_2478_minib-2022-0014
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.