Parenthetical Clauses in the Qurʼān

• Authors: Yehudit Dror
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

In the few traditional Arabic grammatical sources that address the term parentheticals it is usually defined as the insertion of a clause between two other clauses, or between two syntactic components, for taʼkīd “emphasis.” In this article I examine Qurʼānic parenthetical clauses in the theoretical framework of relevance theory. It transpires that the parenthetical clause is placed where it achieves optimal relevance and therfore the conveyed utterance does not require the addresses to waste any efforts trying to procees the information and correctly interpret it. Optimal relevance also means having a contextual effect. The Qur’ānic parenthetical clauses have one of the following contextual effects: They serve to affirm God’s omnipotence, indicating that only God produces suras, created heaven and earth. He is the forgiver and all depends on His will; to explain what it meant by a specific statement or to explain the reason behind a certain action; to qualify, to highlight a specific characterization, for example, one of the parenthetical clauses modify the Qur’ān as the truth from God; to provide background information, which could explain further developments in the narrative.

Keywords

EN

parenthetical clauses; Relevance Theory; contextual effect

• Publisher: Uniwersytet Łódzki. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
• Journal: Research in Language
• Year: 2018
• Volume: 16
• Issue: 4
• Pages: 429-449

Dates

published

2018-12-30

Contributors

author

Yehudit Dror

• University of Haifa, Israel

References

• Arberry, Arthur J. 1964. The Koran Interpreted. London: Oxford University Press.
• Burton-Roberts, Noel. 2006. Parentheticals. In: Keith E. Brown (ed.), Encyclopaedia of Language and Linguistics, 179–189. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
• Dehé, Nicole, Kavalova Yordanke. 2007. Parentheticals: An Introduction. In: Nicole Dehé and Yordanka Kavalova (eds.), Parentheticals, 1–25. Amserdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
• El-Awa, Salw. 2006. Textual Relations in the Qur’ān: Relevance, Coherence and Structure. London and New York: Routledge.
• Gully, Adrian. 1995. Grammar and Semantics in Medieval Arabic: A Study of Ibn-Hisham’s Mughni l-Labib. London: Curzon Press.
• Haegeman, Liliane. 1988. Parenthetical Adverbials: The Radical Orphanage Approach. In Satoshi. Chiba (ed.), Aspects of Modern English Linguistics. Tokyo: Kaitakushi, 232–254.
• Hoffmann, Ludger. 1998. Parenthesen. Linguistische Berichte 175. 299–328.
• Jackendoff, Ray. 1977. X’ Syntax: A Study of Phrase Structure. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
• Kaltenböck, Gunther. 2007. Spoken Parentheticals Clauses in English: A Taxonomy. In: Nicole Dehé and Yordanka Kavalova (eds.), Parentheticals, 25–53. Amserdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
• Kavalova, Yordanke. 2007. And-Parenthetical Clauses. In: Nicole Dehé and Yordanka Kavalova (Eds.), Parentheticals, 145–173. Amserdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
• Peterson, Peter. 1999. On the Boundaries of Syntax. In: Peter Collins and David Lee (eds.), The Clause in English, 229–250. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
• Potts, Christopher. 2002. The Syntax and Semantics of As-Parentheticals. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 20(3). 623–698.
• Reckendorf, Hermann. 1921. Arabische Syntax. Heidelberg: Carl Winter’s Universitätsbuchhandlung.
• Reinhart, Tania. 1983. Point of View in Language: The Use of Parentheticals. In: Gisa Rauh (ed.), Essays on Deixis, 169–194. Tübingen: Narr.
• Sperber, Dan, Wilson, Deirdre. 1996. Relevance: Communication and Cognition, 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.
• Sperber, Dan, Wilson, Deirdre. 2013. Linguistic Form and Relevance. In: Dan Sperber, Deidre Wilson (Eds.), Meaning and Relevance, 149–169. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Yus, Francisco. 2009. Relevance Theory. In: Heine Bernd and Narrog Heiko (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis, 753–777. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press
• Zewi, Tamar. 2007. Parenthesis in Biblical Hebrew. Leiden and Boston: Brill.
• Ziv, Yael. 1985. Parentheticals and Functional Grammar. In: Machtled A. Bolkestein et al. (eds.), Syntax and Pragmatics in Functional Grammar, 181–213. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.
• al-ʻAskarī, ʼAbū Hilāl al-Ḥasan Ibn ʻAbd Allāh. 1971. Kitāb aṣ-ṣināʻatayni: al-kitab wa-š-šiʻr. Beirut: Dār al-kutub al-ʻilmiyya.
• al-Bayḍāwī, ʻAbdallāh Ibn ʻUmar. 1996. ʼAnwār at-tanzīl wa-’asrār at-taʼwīl. Cairo: Maktabat wa-maṭba ʻat al-mašhad al-ḥusaynī.
• Ibn Ğinnī, ʼAbū al-Fatḥ ʻUṯmān. 1913. al-Ḫaṣāʼiṣ. Cairo: Maṭbaʻat al-hilāl.
• Ḥasan, Sāmī ʻAṭā. 2012. al-Ğumla al-muʻtariḍa fī l-Qurʼān al-karīm: mawāḍiʻ ʻuhā wa-dalālatihā. Amman: Dār al-furqān li-n-Našr wa-t-tawzīʻ.
• Ibn ʻĀšūr, Muḥammad aṭ-Ṭāhir. at-Taḥrīr wa-t-tanwīr. 1992. ad-Dār at-tunisiyya li-n-našr.
• ‘Ibn Hišām, Ğamāl ad-Dīn al-’Anṣārī. 1991 Muġnī al-labīb. Beirut: Dār al-Ğīl.
• an-Nasafī, ʻAbdallāh Ibn Aḥmad. 1996. Madārik at-tanzīl wa-ḥaqā’iq at-ta’wīl. Beirut: Dār an-nafā’is.
• al-Qazwīnī, Ğalāl ad-Dīn Muḥammad Ibn ʻAbd ar-Raḥman. 2002. Talḫīṣ al-miftāḥ fī l-maʻānī wal-bayān wa-l-badīʻ. Beirut: al-Maktaba al-ʻaṣriyya.
• ar-Rāzī, Muḥammad Faḫr ad-Dīn. 1993. Mafātīḥ al-ġayb. Beirut: Dār al-fikr li-ṭ-ṭibāʻa wa-n-našr wa-t-tawzīʻ.
• ar-Rāzī, Muḥammad Faḫr ad-Dīn. 2000. Mafātīḥ al-ġayb. Beirut: Dār al-kutub al-ʻilmiyya.
• aš-Šawkānī, Muḥammad ʻAlī Ibn Muḥammad. 1997. Fatḥ al-qadīr. al-Manṣūra: Dār al-wafā’ li-ṭ-ṭibāʻa wa-n-našr wa-t-tawzīʻ.
• Ṭanṭāwī, Muḥammad Sayyid. 1992. at-Tafsīr al-wasīṭ li-l-Qurʼān al-karīm. Cairo: Dār al-maʻārif.
• Yāqūt, Maḥmūd Sulaymān. 1998. ʼIʻrāb al-Qurʼān al-karīm. Dār al-maʻrifa al-ğamiʻiyya.
• az-Zamaḫšarī, ʼAbū al-Qāsim Muḥammad Ibn ʻUmar. 1947. al-Kaššāf ʻan ḥaqāʼiq ġawāmiḍ at-tanzīl. Beirut: Dār al-kitāb al-ʻarabī.

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/rela-2018-0021