The Effect of IP Constituent Position and Foot Complexity on Timing in Polish Learner's English Pronunciation

• Authors: Andrzej Porzuczek
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

This paper focuses on the effect of prominence level and stress distribution on timing in read English speech of Polish learners. We have measured and analysed the length of IP units distinguished by the traditional British School prosodic description, i.e. preheads, heads and nuclei, as well as stress feet, further divided into stressed and unstressed syllables. A comparison of native and Polish learners' performance shows similar durations of stressed and pitch accented syllables. The unstressed syllables and syllable clusters, on the other hand, are significantly longer in non-native speech, and the discrepancies increase at lower phrasal prominence levels, especially in the preheads. Similar results for both groups have been obtained with respect to the number of consecutive unstressed syllables (foot complexity). The same test repeated after seven months of pronunciation training reveals a considerable tendency towards native speech timing, although the differences concerning low prominence levels remain significant.

Keywords

EN

FL pronunciation; timing; acquisition; Polish

• Publisher: Uniwersytet Łódzki. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego
• Journal: Research in Language
• Year: 2010
• Volume: 8
• Pages: 149-162

Dates

published

2010-10-19

Contributors

author

Andrzej Porzuczek

• University of Silesia

References

• Abercrombie, D. 1967. Elements of general phonetics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
• Anisfeld, M., N. Bogo, and W. E. Lambert 1962. Evaluational reactions to accented English speech. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 65, 223-231.
• Arthur, B., D. Farrar and G. Bradford. 1974. Evaluation reactions of college students to dialect differences in the English of Mexican-Americans. Language Speech 17 (3), 255-270. 4465623
• Boersma, P. 2001. Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot International 10, 341-345.
• Bouzon, C. and D. Hirst. 2004. Isochrony and Prosodic Structure in British English. In Bel, B. and I. Marlieu (eds.), Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Speech Prosody. Nara, Japan, 223-226.
• Bryła, A. 2010. Phonetic properties of Euro-English - empirical evidence. In Waniek-Klimczak, E. (ed.), Issues in accents of English 2: Variability and norm. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 37-60.
• Crystal, D. 1969. Prosodic systems and intonation in English. London: Cambridge University Press.
• Dauer, R. 1983. Stress timing and syllable timing reanalyzed. Journal of Phonetics 11, 51-62.
• Dogil, G. 1995. Phonetic correlates of word stress. Phonetic AIMS. Stuttgart: University of Stuttgart, 1-60.
• Dogil, G. 1999. The phonetic manifestation of word stress in Lithuanian, Polish, German and Spanish. In: Van der Hulst, H. (ed.), Word Prosodic Systems in the Languages of Europe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 273-311.
• Dziubalska-Kołaczyk, K. 2002. Beats-and-Binding Phonology. Frankfurt/Main: Peter Lang. ThomsonISI: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=000268778800005&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=b7bc2757938ac7a7a821505f8243d9f3
• Felps, D., H. Bortfeld and R. Gutierrez-Osuna. 2009. Foreign accent conversion in computer assisted pronunciation training. Speech Communication 51, 920-932. 21124807 doi: 10.1016/j.specom.2008.11.004 ThomsonISI: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=000269092500010&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=b7bc2757938ac7a7a821505f8243d9f3
• Gonet, W., J. Szpyra-Kozłowska and R. Święciński, 2010. The acquisition of Vowel Reduction by Polish students of English. In Waniek-Klimczak, E. (ed.), Issues in Accents of English 2: Variability and Norm. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishers, 291-308.
• Grabe, E. and E. L. Low. 2003. Durational variability in speech and the rhythm class hypothesis. In Papers in laboratory phonology 7, 515-546.
• Grabe, E., B. Post and F. Nolan. 2001. The IViE Corpus. Department of Linguistics, University of Cambridge. http://www.phon.ox.ac.uk/IViE
• Halliday, M. A. K. 1967. Intonation and Grammar in British English. Mouton.
• Halliday, M. A. K. 1970. A Course in Spoken English: Intonation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Jassem, W. 1952. Intonation in Conversational English. Warsaw, Polish Academy of Science.
• Jenkins, J. 2000. The Phonology of English as an International Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Ladefoged, P. 1967. Three Areas in Experimental Phonetics, London: Oxford University Press.
• Lehiste, I. 1977. Isochrony reconsidered. Journal of Phonetics 5, 253-263
• Lippi-Green, R., 1997. English With an Accent: Language, Ideology, and Discrimination in the United States. London: Routledge
• Munro, M., and T. Derwing. 1995. Foreign accent, comprehensibility, and intelligibility in the speech of second language learners. Language Learning and Technology 45 (1), 73-97.
• Neri, A., C. Cucchiarini, H. Strik, and L. Boves. 2002. The pedagogy-technology interface in computer assisted pronunciation training. Computer Assisted Language Learning 15 (5), 441-467.
• Nespor, M. 1990. On the rhythm parameter in phonology. In Roca, I. (ed.), Logical Issues in Language Acquisition. Dordrecht: Foris, 157-175.
• Nowacka, M. 2003. ‘Hot bits’ or ‘Hobbits’? - English Speech in Polish Ears. In Sobkowiak, W. and E. Waniek-Klimczak (eds.), Dydaktyka fonetyki języka obcego. Płock: Wydawnictwo PWSZ w Płocku, 97-113.
• Nowacka, M. 2008. The Phonetic Attainment in Polish University and College Students of English. A Study in the Productive and Receptive Pronunciation Skills. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. Maria Curie-Skłodowska University, Lublin.
• Nowak, P. 2006. Vowel reduction in Polish. Ph.D. dissertation. University of California, Berkeley.
• O'Connor, J. 1965. The perception of time intervals. In: UCL Working Papers in Phonetics and Linguistics 2, 10-15.
• O'Connor, J. D. and G. F. Arnold. 1973. Intonation of Colloquial English. Longman, 2 edition.
• Pennington, M. C., 1999. Computer-aided pronunciation pedagogy: promise, limitations, directions. Computer Assisted Language Learning 12, 427-440.
• Pierrehumbert, J. 1980. The phonology and phonetics of English intonation. Ph.D. dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
• Pike, K. L. 1945. The intonation of American English. University Press: Michigan.
• Porzuczek, A. 2007. English vowel quantity in Polish learner's speech perception and production. In Arabski, J., D. Gabryś-Barker and A. Łyda (eds.), PASE Papers 2007. Studies in Language and Methodology of Teaching Foreign Languages. Katowice: PARA, 96-105.
• Ramus, F., M. Nespor and J. Mehler. 1999. Correlates of linguistic rhythm in the speech signal. In Cognition 73, 265-292. 10585517
• Roach, P. 1982. On the distinction between ‘stressed-timed’ and ‘syllable-timed’ languages. In Crystal, D. (ed.), Linguistic Controversies. London: Edward Arnold, 73-79.
• Roach, P. 2002. Studying rhythm and timing in English speech: Scientific curiosity or a classroom necessity? In Waniek-Klimczak, E. and J. Melia (eds.), Accents and Speech in Teaching English Phonetics and Phonology. Frankfurt: Peter Lang, 199-206.
• Ryan, E. B. and M. A. Carranza. 1975. Evaluative reactions of adolescents toward speakers of standard English and Mexican American accented English. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 31 (5), 855-863.
• Schairer, K. E. 1992. Native speaker reaction to non-native speech. Modern Language Journal 76 (3), 309-319.
• Sobkowiak, W. 1996. English Phonetics for Poles. Poznań: Bene Nati.
• Szpyra-Kozłowska, J., J. Frankiewicz and W. Gonet. 2002. Aspekty fonetyki angielskiej nauczane w szkołach średnich. In Sobkowiak, W. and E. Waniek-Klimczak (eds.), Dydaktyka fonetyki języka obcego. Płock: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWSZ w Płocku, 9-27.
• Szpyra-Kozłowska, J. 2003. The Lingua Franca Core and the Polish Learner. In Sobkowiak, W. and E. Waniek-Klimczak (eds.), Dydaktyka fonetyki języka obcego. Płock: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWSZ w Płocku, 193-210.
• Waniek-Klimczak, E. 2005. Temporal Parameters in Second Language Speech. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.
• Waniek-Klimczak, E. 2009. Sources of difficulty in the acquisition of English rhythm by Polish learners. In Wysocka, M. (ed.), On language structure, acquisition and teaching. Studies in Honour of Janusz Arabski on the Occasion of His 70th Birthday Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego, 369-378.
• Weinreich, U. 1953. Languages in contact. Findings and problems. The Hague: Mouton Publishers.
• White, L. and S. L. Mattys. 2007. Calibrating rhythm: First and second language studies. Journal of Phonetics 35, 501-522. doi: 10.1016/j.wocn.2007.02.003 ThomsonISI: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcApp=PARTNER_APP&SrcAuth=LinksAMR&KeyUT=000252002300003&DestLinkType=FullRecord&DestApp=ALL_WOS&UsrCustomerID=b7bc2757938ac7a7a821505f8243d9f3
• Wrembel, M. 2002. Miejsce fonetyki języka angielskiego w szkole. In Sobkowiak, W. and E. Waniek-Klimczak (eds.), Dydaktyka fonetyki języka obcego. Płock: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWSZ w Płocku, 29-40.

Identifiers

DOI

10.2478/v10015-010-0007-4