Activity of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services for biodiversity conservation

• Authors: S. Suresh Ramanan , Anatoliy A, Khapugin
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

W artykule przedstawiono zwięzłe sprawozdanie dotyczące chronologii oraz działalności Międzyrządowej Platformy Polityki Naukowej w sprawie Różnorodności Biologicznej i Usług Ekosystemowych (IPBES). Organizacja ta przywiązuje szczególną wagę do globalnego stanu różnorodności biologicznej, trendów i aktywności politycznej. Artykuł prezentuje uogólniony obraz rozwoju i osiągnięć IPBES w trakcie jego istnienia. Raporty IPBES ze względu na swoje znaczenie są uznawane i aprobowane na całym świecie. Jednak rozpoznawalny sukces IPBES jest niweczony przez sytuację finansową IPBES. W efekcie istnieje stan, która prowadzi ostatecznie do wniosku, że zawsze następuje hamowanie finansowania wspólnego dobra.

Keywords

EN

biodiversity monitoring; ecological assessment; ecological policy; nature conservation; funding

• Publisher: Uniwersytet Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie
• Journal: Annales Universitatis Paedagogicae Cracoviensis Studia Naturae
• Year: 2017

Dates

published

2017-12-31

Contributors

author

S. Suresh Ramanan

• Kerala Agricultural University KAU, College of Forestry, P.O Vellanikkara, Thrissur, 680656 Kerala, India

author

Anatoliy A, Khapugin

• Joint Directorate of the Mordovia State Nature Reserve and National Park "Smolny", Republic of Mordovia, 430011 Saransk, Russia

References

• Barbault, R., Le Duc, J.P. (2005). Proceedings of the International Conference "Biodiversity: Science and Governance". Paris: Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle.
• Burch, S., Berry, P., Sanders, M. (2014). Embedding climate change adaptation in biodiversity conservation: A case study of England. Environmental Science & Policy, 37, 79–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2013.08.014
• Dean, W.R.J., Milton, S.J. (2000). Directed dispersal of Opuntia species in the Karoo, South Africa: are crows the responsible agents? Journal of Arid Environments, 45(4), 305–314. https://doi.org/10.1006/jare.2000.0652
• Editorial (2016). Private funding for science. Nature Methods, 13, 537. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.3923
• Fateryga, V.V., Bagrikova, N.A. (2017). Invasion of Opuntia humifusa and O. phaeacantha (Cactaceae) into plant communities of the Karadag Nature Reserve. Nature Conservation Research, 2(4), 26–39. https://doi.org/10.24189/ncr.2017.011
• Hilton, G.M., Cuthbert, R.J. (2010). The catastrophic impact of invasive mammalian predators on birds of the UK Overseas Territories: a review and synthesis. Ibis, 152(3), 443–458. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-919X.2010.01031.x
• Howarth, C., Viner, D., Dessai, S., Rapley, C., Jones, A. (2017). Enhancing the contribution and role of practitioner knowledge in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Working Group (WG) II process: Insights from UK workshops. Climate Services, 5, 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cliser.2017.04.003
• IPBES (2016). The methodological assessment report on scenarios and models of biodiversity and ecosystem services. In: S. Ferrier, K.N. Ninan, P. Leadley, R. Alkemade, L.A. Acosta, H.R. Akçakaya, L. Brotons, W.W.L. Cheung, V. Christensen, K.A. Harhash, J. Kabubo-Mariara, C. Lundquist, M. Obersteiner, H.M. Pereira, G. Peterson, R. Pichs-Madruga, N. Ravindranath, C. Rondinini, B.A. Wintle (eds.), Secretariat of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Bonn: IPBES.
• Johnson, C.N., Balmford, A., Brook, B.W., Buettel, J.C., Galetti, M., Guangchun, L., Wilmshurst, J.M. (2017). Biodiversity losses and conservation responses in the Anthropocene. Science, 356(6335), 270–275. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aam9317
• Larigauderie, A., Mooney, H.A. (2010). The Intergovernmental science-policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services: moving a step closer to an IPCC-like mechanism for biodiversity. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2(1), 9–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2010.02.006
• Larigauderie, A., Watson, R.T. (2017). IPBES calls for peer review of its draft assessments. Nature Ecology and Evolution, 1(6), 164. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-017-0164
• Liebhold, A.M., Yamanaka, T., Roques, A., Augustin, S., Chown, S.L., Brockerhoff, E.G., Pyšek, P. (2016). Global compositional variation among native and non-native regional insect assemblages emphasizes the importance of pathways. Biological Invasions, 18(4), 893–905. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-016-1079-4
• Loreau, M., Oteng-Yeboah, A., Arroyo, M.T.K., Babin, D., Barbault, R., Donoghue, M., Gadgil, M., Häuser, C., Heip, C., Larigauderie, A., Ma, K. (2006). Diversity without representation. Nature, 442(7100), 245–246. https://doi.org/10.1038/442245a
• Pei, L., Gaisser, S., Schmidt, M. (2012). Synthetic biology in the view of European public funding organisations. Public Understanding of Science, 21(2), 149–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662510393624
• Potts, S.G., Imperatriz-Fonseca, V., Ngo, H.T., Aizen, M.A., Biesmeijer, J.C., Breeze, T.D., Dicks, L.V., Garibaldi, L.A., Hill, R., Settele, J., Vanbergen, A.J. (2016). Safeguarding pollinators and their values to human well-being. Nature, 540(7632), 220–229. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature20588
• Reis, H.T., Collins, W.A., Berscheid, E. (2000). The relationship context of human behaviour and development. Psychological Bulletin, 126(6), 844–872.
• Rybakova, L.I. (2013). State Scientific and Technological Policy and Financing of Science (Experience 2000–2012). Science. Innovation. Education, 14, 151–174. [In Russian]
• Sharma, G.P., Raghubanshi, A.S., Singh, J.S. (2005). Lantana invasion: an overview. Weed Biology and Management, 5(4), 157–165. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1445-6664.2005.00178.x
• Smith, J.B., Schneider, S.H., Oppenheimer, M., Yohe, G.W., Hare, W., Mastrandrea, M.D., Patwardhan, A., Burton, I., Corfee-Morlot, J., Magadza, C.H., Füssel, H.M. (2009). Assessing dangerous climate change through an update of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) "reasons for concern". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(11), 4133–4137. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0812355106
• Stokstad, E. (2017). UN biodiversity group confronts cash crunch. Science, 355(6332), 1358. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.355.6332.1358
• Turnhout, E., Bloomfield, B., Hulme, M., Vogel, J., Wynne, B. (2012). Conservation policy: listen to the voices of experience. Nature, 488(7412), 454–455. https://doi.org/10.1038/488454a
• van Kleunen, M, Dawson, W., Essl, F., Pergl, J., Winter, M., Weber, E., Kreft, H., Weigelt, P., Kartesz, J., Nishino, M., Antonova, L.A. (2015). Global exchange and accumulation of non-native plants. Nature, 525(7567), 100–103. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14910
• Vavilov, N.I. (1927). Geographical regularities in the distribution of the genes of cultivated plants. Bulletin of Applied Botany, Genetics and Selection, 17(3), 411–428.
• Villamagna, A.M., Murphy, B.R. (2010). Ecological and socio-economic impacts of invasive water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes): a review. Freshwater biology, 55(2), 282–298. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02294.x
• Viña, A., McConnell, W.J., Yang, H., Xu, Z., Liu, J. (2016). Effects of conservation policy on China’s forest recovery. Science Advances, 2(3), 1–8. p.e1500965. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1500965

Identifiers

DOI

10.24917/25438832.2.13