Cryopreserving the present? The climate crisis and the emergence of a politics of suspension

• Authors: Thomas Lemke

Title variants

PL

Krioprezerwacja teraźniejszości? Kryzys klimatyczny i powstanie polityki zawieszenia

Abstracts

EN

Scholars analyzing contemporary technologies of freezing have recently argued that “cryopolitics” represents an important extension of the classical concept of biopolitics as it operates by the principle to “make live and not let die” (Friedrich 2017; Radin and Kowal 2017). It extends temporal horizons by suspending metabolic processes and establishing a “state of a potentially reversible death” (Neumann 2006). This article advances this theoretical proposition further by exploring the dimensions of a “politics of suspension” in the light of the climate crisis. It discusses the infrastructural role of cryopreservation and cryobanking technologies in addressing biodiversity loss and the vital challenges of the Anthropocene. These technologies promise to keep future options open by reversing past extinctions in order to address the existential threats of the present. Following this imagination, de-extinction scientists and biologists dream of restoring ancient ecosystems and resurrecting extinct species as a way of responding to the climate crisis. However, this politics of suspension might also contribute to tendencies to preserve the status quo by putting on hold the political and social transformations needed to effectively respond to the climate crisis.

Keywords

EN

biopolitics; cryopolitics; “politics of suspension”; biodiversity; de-extinction

• Publisher: Uniwersytet Opolski
• Journal: Studia Krytyczne/ Critical Studies
• Year: 2021
• Issue: 10
• Pages: 55-62

Dates

published

2021

Contributors

author

Thomas Lemke

• Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main

• https://orcid.org/0000000230221707

References

• Breithoff, Esther and Rodney Harrison. 2018. “From ark to bank: Extinction, proxies and biocapital in ex-situ biodiversity conservation practices.” International Journal of Heritage Studies 26(2): 1–19
• Clarke, Adele. 2009: “The Frozen Ark Project: The role of zoos and aquariums in preserving the genetic material of threatened animals.” International Zoo Yearbook 43(1): –230.
• Chrulew, Matthew. 2011. “Managing love and death at the zoo: The biopolitics of endangered species preservation.” Australian Humanities Review 50: 137–157.
• Chrulew, Matthew. 2017. “Freezing the ark: The cryopolitics of endangered species preservation.” In Cryopolitics: Frozen life in a melting world, edited by Joanna Radin and Emma Kowal, 283–306. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Church, George M. and Ed Regis. 2012. Regenesis: How Synthetic Biology Will Reinvent Nature and Ourselves. New York: Basic Books.
• Cohen, Lawrence. 2005. “Operability, bioavailability, and exception.” In Global assemblages: Technology, politics, and ethics as anthropological problems, edited by Aihwa Ong and Stephen J. Collier, pp. 79–90. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
• Comizzoli, Pierre. 2017. “Biobanking and fertility preservation for rare and endangered species.” Animal Reproduction 14: 30–33.
• Corley-Smith, Graham E. and Bruce P. Brandhorst. 1999. “Preservation of endangered species and populations: A role for genome banking, domatic cell cloning, and androgenesis?” Molecular Reproduction and Development 53(3): 363–367.
• Fletcher, Amy L. 2014. Mendel’s ark: Biotechnology and the future of extinction. New York: Springer.
• Folkers, Andreas. 2019. “Freezing time, Ppreparing for the future: The stockpile as a temporal matter of security.” Security Dialogue 50(6): 493–511.
• Friedrich, Alexander. 2020. “A cold yield: Cryopreserved oocytes of ‘social freezing’ customers as potential option values for biomedical research.” New Genetics and Society 39(3): 327–351.
• Friedrich, Alexander and Christoph Hubig. 2018. “Kryosphäre: Künstliche Kälte im Dispositiv der Biomacht.” In Technik–Macht–Räume, edited by Andreas Brenneis, Oliver Honer, Sina Keesser, Annette Ripper and Silke Vetter-Schultheiß, 159–184. Wiesbaden: Springer.
• Friese, Carrie. 2009. “Models of cloning, models for the zoo: Rethinking the sociological significance of cloned animals.” Biosocieties 4(4): 367–390.
• Friese, Carrie. 2013. Cloning wildlife: Zoos, captivity, and the future of endangered snimals. New York: New York University Press.
• Gehring, Petra. 2007. “Evolution, Temporalisierung und Gegenwart revisited. Spielräume in Luhmanns Zeittheorie.” Soziale Systeme 13(1+2): 421–31.
• Haraway, Donna. 2016. Staying with the trouble. Durham–London: Duke UniversityPress.
• Herridge, Victoria. 2021. “Before making a mammoth, ask the public.” Nature 598: 387.
• Kaiser, Mario. 2015. “Reactions to the future: The chronopolitics of prevention and preemption.” Nanoethics 9: 165–177.
• Laboissière, Anna-Katharina. 2019. “Collect, save, adapt: Making and unmaking ex situ worlds.” Cultural Studies Review 25(1): 65–84.
• Lanza, Robert P., Betsy L. Dresser and Philip Damiani. 2000. “Cloning Noah’s Ark: Biotechnology might offer the best way to keep some endangered species from disappearing from the planet.” Scientific American 283(5): 84–89.
• Latour, Bruno. 2004. “Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern.” Critical Inquiry 30: 225–248.
• Lemke, Thomas. 2021. “Welcome to whenever: Exploring suspended life in cryopreservation practices.” Science, Technology, & Human Values. November: 1–27.
• Lemke, Thomas 2022. “Conceptualising suspended life: From latency to liminality”. Theory, Culture and Society, online first: DOI: 10.1177/02632764221113737
• O’Connor, M. R. 2015. Resurrection science: Conservation, de-extinction and the precarious future of wild things. Melbourne, Australia: Affirm Press.
• Puíg de la Bellacasa, Maria. 2017. Matters of care. Minneapolis, MI: University of Minnesota Press.
• Radin, Joanna. 2017. Life on ice: A history of new uses for cold blood. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
• Radin, Joanna and Emma Kowal, Eds. 2017. Cryopolitics: Fozen life in a melting world. Cambridge: MIT Press.
• Robinson, Kim Stanley. 2012. 2312. New York: Orbit/Hatchette.
• Roosth, Sophia. 2017. Synthetic: How life got made. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
• Saragusty, Joseph et al., 2016. “Rewinding the process of mammalian extinction.” Zoo Biology 35(4): 280–292.
• Shapiro, Beth. 2015. How to clone a mammoth: The science of de-extinction. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
• Vogl, Joseph. 2007. Über das Zaudern. Berlin: Diaphanes.
• Wolff, Leon. 2021. “The past shall not begin: Frozen seeds, extended presents and the politics of reversibility.” Security Dialogue 52(1): 79–95.
• Zimmer, Carl. 2021. A new company with a wild mission: Bringing back the woolly mammoth. The New York Times, September 13.

Identifiers

DOI

10.25167/sk.4940

Biblioteka Nauki

16539464