Reputation determinants of the banking sector in Poland

• Authors: Marcin Idzik , Jacek Gieorgica

Abstracts

EN

The objective of this paper is to identify the determinants of reputation of the banking sector in Poland and to segment the society according to the factors that shape the reputation. Banks in Poland have a good reputation. The factors of a good reputation are in clear advantage over the factors of a bad reputation. The most important things in shaping the banks’ reputation are the axiological determinants. Their significance is three times as high as the effectiveness determinants linked to the satisfaction with the banking services, and it is much higher than the impact of the normative determinants connected with the institutional aspects of the banking sector. The three selected homogeneous typological groups of consumers differ from each other in terms of normative, axiological and altruistic determinants that shape the reputation. The effectiveness determinants do not diversify the consumers in terms of their impact on the the banks’ reputation assessment. The most important touch points that shape the banks’ reputation are: consumers’ personal experience, customer service attendants in the banks, friends’ opinions as well as the opinions of the people who are regarded by the consumers as experts. When modelling the reputation determinants, a structural equation modelling method (SEM) was used. Studies were carried out on a nationwide representative sample of N=1000 residents of Poland using the CAPI method in March 2019.

Keywords

EN

banks; reputation; structural equation models (SEM – Structural Equation Models)

• Publisher: Bankowy Fundusz Gwarancyjny
• Journal: Bezpieczny Bank
• Year: 2019
• Volume: 77
• Issue: 4
• Pages: 81-109

Dates

published

2019

Contributors

author

Marcin Idzik

• Szkoła Główna Gospodarstwa Wiejskiego

• https://orcid.org/0000000276322941

author

Jacek Gieorgica

• Związek Banków Polskich

• https://orcid.org/0000000291965195

References

• Balmer J, Gray E. R., (2000), Corporate identity and corporate communications: creating a competitive advantage, Industrial and Commercial Training p. 24-25.
• Bennett, R., Gabriel, H. (2001), Reputation, trust and supplier commitment: the case of shipping company/seaport relations. The Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 16(6), 424-438.
• Bojańczyk M. (2012), Niestabilna gospodarka, upadek zaufania i co dalej? (Unstable Economy, Loss of Trust and What Next?) Oficyna Wydawnicza Szkoły Głównej Handlowej, Warszawa, p. 14.
• Bollen K. A (1989), Structural Equations with Latent Variables, Wiley.
• Brzeziński J. (1996), Metodologia badań psychologicznych (Część V). (Methodology of Psychological Studies (Part5)) PWN Warszawa.
• Cramer, S. & Ruefli, T. (1994), Corporate reputation dynamics: Reputation inertia, reputation risk, and reputation prospect, Paper presented at the National Academy of Management Meetings, Dallas
• Doorley, J. And Garcia, H. F. (2007), Reputation Management. New York: Routledge
• Fombrun, C.J. and Shanely, M. (1990), What’s in a name? Reputation Building and Corporate Strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 33: 233-258.
• Fombrun, C.J., and Van Riel, C. B. M. (1997), The Reputational Landscape. Corporate Reputation Review, 1(5): 5-13.
• Gatnar E. (2003), Statystyczne modele struktury przyczynowej zjawisk ekonomicznych (Statistical Models of Causal Structure of Economic Events.), AE, Katowice.
• Gotsi M., Wilson A.M., (2001), Corporate reputation: seeking a definition, Corporate Communica-tions: An International Journal, p. 24-30.
• Harrington D., Confirmatory Factor Analysis, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2008.
• Hollander M, Wolfe D. (1999). Nonparametric statistical methods. Wiley series in probability and statistics: applied probability and statistic. New York: Wiley.
• Januszewski A. (2011), Modele równań strukturalnych w metodologii badań psychologicznych. Problematyka przyczynowości w modelach strukturalnych i dopuszczalność modeli (Structural Equation Models in Methodology of Psychological Research. The Issue of Causality in Structural Models and Model Admissibility). Studia z Psychologii w KUL, tom 17, Lublin, Wyd. KUL, p. 213-245
• Jöreskog K. G. (2002), Structural Equation Modeling with Ordinal Variables Using LISREL.
• Kaplan D. (2000), Structural Equation Modeling: Foundations and Extensions, Sage Publications.
• Kline, R. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling, NY: The Guilford Press.
• Konarski R. (2010), Modele równań strukturalnych. Teoria i praktyka. (Structural Equation Modelling. Theory and Practice), PWN, Warszawa.
• Low, J., Kalafut, P.C., 2004, Niematerialna wartość firmy (Intangible Value of the Company), Oficyna Ekonomiczna, Kraków.
• Majchrzak K. (2009), Zarządzanie reputacją korporacyjna we współczesnej gospodarce (Managing Corporate Reputation in Contemporary Economy), in: Public relations – Current Issues of Art of Communication in Theory and Practice, ed. Maćkowska, H. Przybylski, Wydawnictwo Akademii Ekonomicznej w Katowicach, Katowice, p. 291-292.
• Majchrzak, K., 2011, Zarządzanie reputacją w przedsiębiorstwach sektora naftowego (Managing Reputation in the Oil Sector Companies), Oficyna Wydawnicza SGH, Warszawa.
• Osińska M. (2008), Ekonometryczna analiza zależności przyczynowych (Econometric Analysis of the Causal Dependencies), UMK, Toruń.
• Pearl J. (2000), Causality. Models, reasoning and inference, Cambrige.
• Reputacja Polskiego sektora bankowego (2019) (Reputation of the Polish Banking Sector 2019). Związek Banków Polskich, Warszawa.
• Rydzak W. (2011), Reputacja a działania informacyjne organizacji w sytuacjach kryzysowych i determinanty ich wyboru (Reputation vs. Informative Activities of an Organization in Crisis Situations and Determinants of Their Choice), Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Poznaniu, Poznań, p. 20-24.
• Sztompka P. (2007), Fundament społeczeństwa (Trust. Society’s Foundation), Wydawnictwo Znak, Kraków.
• Walker K., (2010), Corporate Reputation Review, A Systematic Review of the Corporate Reputation Literature: Definition, Measurement, and Theory, 2010
• Wartick, S. L. (1992), The Relationship between intense media exposure and change in corporate relationship. Business and Society, 31: 33-49.
• Wójcik K. (2009), Public relations. Wiarygodny dialog z otoczeniem (Public Relations. Credible Dialogue with the Surroundings), Wydawnictwo Placet, Warszawa.
• Wojcik, K., (2014), Wszystko, co chciałabym wiedzieć o public relations i nie boję się zapytać– dylematy PR (Everything, I Want to Know About Public Relations and I Am Not Afraid to Ask-PR Dilemmas), in: Public relations – Improving the Communication Process in Public Space, Studia Ekonomiczne, Zeszyty Naukowe Wydziałowe, Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny w Katowicach, Katowice.

Identifiers

DOI

10.26354/bb.5.4.77.2019

Biblioteka Nauki

2052147