The Quality of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles: Ergodesign Aspect. Part 2

• Authors: Volodymyr Kharchenko , Anatolii Rubtsov , Volodymyr Svirko , Iryna Zhudova

Abstracts

EN

In the modern world, scientific and practical ergodesign activity on the development and use of drones, the concept of "human factor" is becoming more and more important. It is one of the main studies in improving the safety, efficiency and comfort of the "man - unmanned aerial vehicle" system operation. The most promising research is aimed at the application and development of new approaches to the evaluation of algorithms for unmanned aircraft maintenance and the organization of their operators` activities. The system of unmanned aerial vehicles ergodesign quality indicators developed and presented in a tabular form reflects practically all design and ergonomic properties of modern unmanned aerial systems. It is based on the existing normative documentation inUkrainedeveloped by the authors, harmonized with international and European standards. It allows the analysis and evaluation of unmanned aerial vehicles in order to take into account consumer interests at the beginning of their design reducing the assimilation time of products and preventing irrational production costs. The results of such an analysis underlie the development of technical documentation, standards, and specifications. They should be taken into account when putting products into production.

Keywords

EN

unmanned aerial vehicle; ergodesign aspect; aerial systems

• Publisher: Międzynarodowa Wyższa Szkoła Logistyki i Transportu
• Journal: Logistics and Transport
• Year: 2022
• Volume: 53-54
• Issue: 1-2
• Pages: 133-160

Dates

published

2022

Contributors

author

Volodymyr Kharchenko

• National Aviation University Kiev

• https://orcid.org/0000000175754366

author

Anatolii Rubtsov

• National Aviation University Kiev

• https://orcid.org/0000000279928236

author

Volodymyr Svirko

• National Aviation University Kiev

• https://orcid.org/0000000264826827

author

Iryna Zhudova

• National Aviation University Kiev

• https://orcid.org/0000000317294319

References

• Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS), Roadmap 2005-2030, Office of the Secretary of Defense.
• Hodson Ch. J., Сivil airworthiness for a UAV control station, University of York, York 2008.
• Dali M., Unmanned Aerial Vehicles and Targets, Hobbes the Printers, 2010.
• Papanek V., Design for the real world. Human ecology and social change, Academy Chicago Publishers, Chicago 2008.
• Jason S., McCarley Ch., Wickens D., Human factors concerns in UAV flight, [in:] Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 46th Annual Meeting, Baltimore, Maryland, September 30–October 4, 2002, Baltimore 2009, pp. 2144-2148.
• Osipov Yu., Requirements for tools and training programs for UAV operators in unmanned aircraft systems, “Armament. Politics. Conversion” 99 (2011)/3.
• Kharchenko V., Rubtsov A., Svirko V., Ergodesingn Factor in the Development of Unmanned Aircraft Systems, “Proceedings of the National Aviation University”, 81 (2019)/4, pp. 6-13.
• Rubtsov A., Svirko V., Matiichik M., Kharchenko V., Shmelova T., 2021 Methodology of ergodesign assessment of unmanned aircraft complexes, National Aviation University, Kyiv 2021.
• ISO 11064-1:2000 Ergonomic design of control centres, Part 1: Principles for the design of control centres.
• ISO 11064-2:2000 Ergonomic design of control centres, Part 2: Principles for the arrangement of control suites.
• ISO 11064-3:1999 Ergonomic design of control centres, Part 3: Control room layout.
• ISO 11064-4:2013 Ergonomic design of control centres, Part 4: Layout and dimensions of workstations.
• ISO 11064-5:2008 Ergonomic design of control centres, Part 5: Displays and controls.
• ISO 11064-6:2005 Ergonomic design of control centres, Part 6: Environmental requirements for control centers.

Identifiers

DOI

10.26411/83-1734-2015-1-53-7-22

Biblioteka Nauki

2056522