Summary Statements in the Gospel of Matthew

• Authors: Piotr Herok

Abstracts

EN

This article examines the summary statements in the first gospel. The investigation aims to establish a precise set of Matthean texts belonging to this literary genre. Following a presentation of a variety of solutions (R. Schnackenburg, J. Gnilka, E. Schweizer, D.A. Hagner, R.H. Gundry, J. Nolland, A. Paciorek, U. Luz, R.T. France, W.D. Davies and D.C. Allison, C.S. Keener, G.R. Osborne, C.A. Evans, S. Grasso, W. Egger, B. Gerhardsson, L. Novakovic), literary considerations are examined against the background of various scholarly propositions, giving precise criteria to denote a given gospel text as a summary. On this basis, eight Matthean texts are proposed as summaries – (1) 4:23–25, (2) 8:16–17, (3) 9:35–36, (4) 12:15–21, (5) 14:13–14, (6) 14:34–36, (7) 15:29–31, and (8) 19:1–2 – while showing their thematic interpenetration and mutual dependence.

Keywords

EN

summary statements; literary genre; Matt 4:23-25; Jesus’ healing activity

• Publisher: Katolicki Uniwersytet Lubelski Jana Pawła II
• Journal: The Biblical Annals
• Year: 2023
• Volume: 13
• Issue: 4
• Pages: 617-633

Dates

published

2023

Contributors

author

Piotr Herok

• Uniwersytet Opolski

• https://orcid.org/0000000157062366

References

• Becker, E.-M., “Die markinischen Summarien – ein literarischer und theologischer Schlüssel zu Markus 1–2,” New Testament Studies 56 (2010) 452–474.
• Berger, K., Formgeschichte des Neuen Testaments (Heidelberg: Quelle & Meyer 1984).
• Brown, S., “The Mission to Israel in Matthew’s Central Section (Mt 9,35–11,1),” Zeitschrift fur die neutestamentliche Wissenschaft 69 (1978) 73–90.
• Burkill, T.A., “Mark 3:7–12 and the Alleged Dualism in the Evangelist’s Miracle Material,” Journal of Biblical Literature 87/4 (1968) 409–417.
• Comber, J.C., “The Verb Therapeuō in Matthew’s Gospel,” Journal of Biblical Literature 97/3 (1978) 431–434.
• Davies, W.D. – Allison Jr., D.C., The Gospel according to Saint Matthew (International Critical Commentary; London – New York: Clark 2000, 2001, 2004) I–III.
• Delorme, J., “Les sommaires en Marc. Problèmes de méthode et de sens,” Mysterium regni ministerium verbi (Mc 4,11; At 6,4). Scritti in onore di mons. Vittorio Fusco (ed. E. Franco) (Supplementi alla Rivista Biblica 38; Bologna: Dehoniane 2001) 119–136.
• Dibelius, M., Die Formgeschichte des Evangeliums, 6 ed. (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck 1971).
• Dodd, C.H., “The Framework of the Gospel Narrative,” The Expository Times 43 (1931–1932) 396–400.
• Duling, D.C., “The Therapeutic Son of David: an Element in Matthew’s Christological Apologetic,” New Testament Studies 24 (1978) 392–410.
• Egger, W., Frohbotschaft und Lehre. Die Sammelberichte des Wirkens Jesu im Markus-evangelium (Frankfurter Theologische Studien 19; Frankfurt am Main: Knecht 1976).
• Evans, C.A., Matthew (New Cambridge Bible Commentary; Cambridge, UK – New York: Cambridge University Press 2012).
• France, R.T., The Gospel According to Matthew. An Introduction and Commentary (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans 1985).
• France, R.T., The Gospel of Matthew (The New International Commentary on the New Testament; Grand Rapids, MI – Cambridge, UK: Eerdmans 2007).
• Gerhardsson, B., The Mighty Acts of Jesus according to Matthew (Scripta Minora Regiae Societatis Humaniorum Litterarum Lundensis; Lund: CWK Gleerup 1979).
• Gnilka, J., Das Matthäusevangelium. I. Kommentar zu Kap. 1,1–13,58. II. Kommentar zu Kap. 14,1–28,20 (Herders Theologischer Kommentar zum Neuen Testament 1; Freiburg – Basel – Wien: Herder 1986–1992).
• Grasso, S., Il Vangelo di Matteo. Commento esegetico e teologico (Roma: Città Nuova 2014).
• Gundry, R.H., Matthew. A Commentary on His Handbook for a Mixed Church under Persecution, 2 ed. (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans 1994).
• Hagner, D.A., Matthew. [I.] 1–13. [II.] 14–28 (World Biblical Commentary 33a –b; Dallas, TX: Word Books 1993–1995).
• Hedrick, C.W., “The Role of ‘Summary Statements’ in the Composition of the Gospel of Mark. A Dialog with Karl Schmidt and Norman Perrin,” Novum Testamentum 26 (1984) 289–311.
• Keck, L.E., “Mark 3:7–12 and Mark’s Christology,” Journal of Biblical Literature 84/4 (1965) 341–358.
• Keener, C.S., The Gospel of Matthew. A Socio-Rhetorical Commentary (Grand Rapids, MI – Cambridge, UK: Eerdmans 2009).
• Luz, U., Matthew 1–7. A Commentary (Hermeneia; Minneapolis, MN: Fortress 2007).
• Nolland, J., The Gospel of Matthew. A Commentary on the Greek Text (The New International Greek Testament Commentary; Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans 2005).
• Marguerat, D. – Bourquin, Y., Per leggere i racconti biblici. La Bibbia si racconta. Iniziazione all’analisi narrativa (trans. M. Zappella) (Roma: Borla 2001).
• Mölle, H. “Summarien,” Bibel-Lexikon, 2 ed. (ed. H. Haag) (Einsiedeln – Zürich – Köln: Benziger 1968) 751.
• Novakovic, L., Messiah, the Healer of the Sick. A Study of Jesus as the Son of David in the Gospel of Matthew (Wissenschaftliche
• Untersuchungen zum Neuen Testament 2/170; Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck 2003).
• Osborne, G.R., Matthew (Zondervan Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament 1; Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan 2010).
• Paciorek, A., Ewangelia według świętego Mateusza. I. Rozdziały 1–13. II. Rozdziały 14–28 (Nowy Komentarz Biblijny. Nowy Testament 1/1–2; Częstochowa: Edycja Świętego Pawła 2005–2008).
• von Rad, G., Weisheit in Israel (Neukirchen-Vluyn: Neukirchener 1970).
• Schnackenburg, R., Matthäusevangelium. I. 1,1–16,20. II. 16,21–28,20 (Die Neue Echter Bibel 1; Würzburg: Echter 1985–1987).
• Schweizer, E., Das Evangelium nach Matthäus, 3 ed. (Das Neue Testament Deutsch 2; Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht 1981).
• Yieh, J.Y.-H., One Teacher. Jesus’ Teaching Role in Matthew’s Gospel Report (Beihefte zur Zeitschrift für die Neutestamentliche Wissenschaft 124; Berlin: De Gruyter 2004).
• Zappella, L., Manuale di analisi narrativa biblica (Strumenti 65; Torino: Claudiana 2014).

Identifiers

DOI

10.31743/biban.14912

Biblioteka Nauki

20679252