Why Archaeology is important for Theology

• Authors: Cayetana Heidi Johnson

Abstracts

EN

The Old Testament is clearly a mixture of myths and real historical figures with their events. There is no question about the contribution of mythology, since much of Genesis has been formed from common mythological accounts from all over the ancient Near East. The stories of Creation, the primordial couple, the Garden of Eden, Cain and Abel, the Great Flood, and much more, are a commonplace of narratives throughout the region. Although these accounts are mythological, it does not mean that they have not been shaped by real events. Specialists speculate about a great flood that took place in the Near East as a result of rising water levels at the end of the last Ice Age (around 5000 BC). This coincided at a time when the Agricultural Revolution had taken over the Fertile Crescent and Egypt. Various peoples of the Levant adopted mythological narratives and reformulated them to create their own unique and original tales. Some of the main figures of the Bible, such as Adam and Eve, Noah, Lot, finally the patriarchs (Abraham, Isaac and Jacob) were their own compositions but, as can be seen with the patriarch Abraham, who was not an exclusive figure of the Hebrew people, his conversion to monotheism is, however, something peculiar to the spiritual creativity of the Jews. Here as in the composition of the New Testament, archeology is the necessary aid to locate the reality and the truth of sacred history and its development in human time.

Keywords

PL

Bible; Mesopotamia; Epypt; patriarchs; Israel; Canaan; Syria; religion; archeology; Near Est

• Publisher: Komitet Nauk Teologicznych PAN
• Journal: Studia Nauk Teologicznych PAN
• Year: 2021
• Issue: 16
• Pages: 29-48

Dates

published

2021

Contributors

author

Cayetana Heidi Johnson

• San Damaso University, Madrid

• https://orcid.org/0000000186239108

References

• Avi-Jonah M., Jerusalem of the Second Temple Period, in: Y. Yadin (ed.), Jerusalem Re- vealed. Archaeology in the Holy City 1968–1974, Jerusalem: The Israel Exploration Society 1975, p. 21–24.
• Avigad N., The Architecture of Jerusalem in the Second Temple Period, in: Y. Yadin (ed.), Jerusalem Revealed. Arcaheology in the Holy City 1968–1974, p. 14–20.
• Ben Tor A. (ed.), The Archaeology of Ancient Israel, New Haven and London: Yale Uni- versity Press – The Open University of Israel 1992.
• Buccellatti G., The Amorites of the Ur III period, Naples: Istituto Orientale 1966. Halpern B., The Stela from Dan: Epigraphic and Historical Considerations, “Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research” (1994), no. 296, p. 63–80, https://doi.org/10.2307/1357180 [access: 1 IV 2021].
• Herod and the Herodian Dynasty, from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem: History of the Second Temple and Talmudic Era – Online Resources (huji.ac.il), http://jewish- history.huji.ac.il/internetresources/historyresources/second_temple_and_talmudic_era. htm#Herod [access: 1 IV 2021].
• Jastrow M., The Religion of Babylon and Assyria, Boston: Ginn & Company 1898. Kamrin J., The Aamu of Shu in the Tomb of Khnumhotep II at Beni Hassan, “Journal of Ancient Egyptian Interconnections” 1 (2009), p. 22–36.
• Kempinski A., The Middle Bronze Age, in: A. Ben Tor (ed.), The Archaeology of Ancient Israel, New Haven and London: Yale University Press – The Open University of Israel 1992, p. 159–210.
• Lemaire A., Cycle primitif d’Abraham et contexte géographico-historique, in: A. Lemaire, B. Otzen (eds.), History and Traditions in Early Israel. Studies Presented to Eduard Nielsen, Leiden: Brill 1993, p. 62–67.
• Lemche N.P., City-Dwellers or Administrators. Further Light on the Canaanites, in: A. Lemaire, B. Otzen (eds.), History and Traditions in Early Israel. Studies Presented to Eduard Nielsen, Leiden: Brill 1993, p. 86–87.
• Magnusson M., BC. The Archaeology of the Lands of the Bible, London: The Bodley Head 1977.
• Mazar E., Shalev Y., Reuven P., Steinberg J., Balogh B., The Walls of the Temple Mount, vol. I–II, Jerusalem: Shoham Academic Research and Publication 2011.
• Mieroop Van De M., The Ancient Mesopotamian City, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2004.
• Montero Fenollós J.L., De Uruk a Mari. Innovaciones tecnológicas de la Primera Rev- olución Urbana en el Medio Éufrates meridional, “Anejos de Nailós” (2014), no. 1, p. 139–155.
• Netzer E., The Architecture of Herod, the Great Builder, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck 2006. Newberry P.E., Beni Hasan, part I–IV, London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Tubner & Co. Ltd. 1893–1900.
• Oppenheim A.L., Ancient Mesopotamia. Portrait of a Dead Civilization, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press 1970.
• Papers of Professor David Storm Rice relating to the Harran Excavation – Archives Hub (jisc.ac.uk), https://archiveshub.jisc.ac.uk/data/gb102-ms380755 [access: 1 IV 2021]. Peleg-Barkat O., Zelinger Y., Uziel J., Gadot Y., Gibson S., Lewis R., New Studies in the Archaeology of Jerusalem and its Region, Jerusalem: The Hebrew University of Jerusalem 2019.
• Rabinowitz J., Faces of God: Canaanite mythology or Hebrew theology, Woodstock, CT: Spring Publications 1998.
• Redford D.B., Egypt, Canaan and Israel in Ancient Times, Cairo: The American University in Cairo Press 1995.
• Widell M., Ur III Economy and Bureaucracy: The Neo-Sumerian Cuneiform Tablets in the Hood Museum of Art, Dartmouth College (I), “Orient” 55 (2020), p. 117–154, https:// doi.org/10.5356/orient.55.117 [access: 1 IV 2021].

Identifiers

DOI

10.31743/snt.12488

Biblioteka Nauki

2040868