Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2024 | 317 | 1 | 5-18

Article title

Wage- or Profit-Led Regime? The Case of Poland

Content

Title variants

PL
Wzrost gospodarczy napędzany przez płace czy zyski? Przypadek Polski

Languages of publication

Abstracts

PL
Badanie ma na celu ustalenie, czy polska gospodarka działa w ramach reżimu opartego na płacach czy na zyskach. Analizując to, jak zmiany w rozkładzie dochodów wpływają na konsumpcję, inwestycje oraz eksport netto, można wnioskować o naturze reżimu gospodarczego Polski, co ułatwia formułowanie polityk opartych na dowodach, a także wspiera zrównoważony rozwój gospodarczy kraju. Długoterminowy wpływ zwiększenia udziału zysków na wzrost gospodarczy okazuje się istotnie negatywny, dając podstawy do wniosku, że Polska gospodarka w okresie 2001–2022 funkcjonowała w reżimie opartym na płacach. Szacunek całkowitego wpływu krańcowego zwiększenia udziału zysków na produkt, z uwzględnieniem mechanizmów mnożnikowych, wynosi –0,22.
EN
This study aims to investigate whether the Polish economy operates under a wage-led or profit-led economic regime. By analysing how changes in income distribution affect consumption, investment, and net exports, insights are gained into the nature of the economic regime, facilitating evidence-based policy formulation and fostering sustainable economic development in the country. The long-term impact of an increase in the profit share on economic growth is found to be significantly negative, giving rise to the conclusion that the Polish economy was in a wage-led regime from 2001 to 2022. The estimated total marginal effect of an increased profit share on output, including multiplier mechanisms, is –0.22.

Year

Volume

317

Issue

1

Pages

5-18

Physical description

Dates

published
2024

Contributors

  • SGH Warsaw School of Economics, Poland

References

  • Akcay Ü., Jungmann B. [2022], Political economy of growth regimes in Poland and Turkey, Working Paper No. 190.
  • Baccaro L., Hadziabdic S. [2023], Operationalizing growth models, Quality & Quantity, 58: 1325–1360, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-023-01685-w.
  • Baccaro L., Pontusson J. [2016], Rethinking comparative political economy: the growth model perspective, Politics & Society, 44 (2): 175–207.
  • Bhaduri A., Marglin S. [1990], Unemployment and the real wage: the economic basis for contesting political ideologies, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 14 (4): 375–393, http://www.jstor.org/stable/23598376.
  • Blecker R. [2002], Distribution, demand and growth in neo-Kaleckian macro-models, in: Setterfield M. (ed.), The economics of demand-led growth: challenging the supply-side vision of the long run: 129–152, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
  • Blecker R. A. [2016], Wage-led versus profit-led demand regimes: the long and the short of it, Review of Keynesian Economics, 4 (4): 373–390, https://doi.org/10.4337/roke.2016.04.02, http://www.elgaronline.com/view/journals/roke/4-4/roke.2016.04.02.xml.
  • Disoska E. M., Toshevska-Trpcevska K. [2016], Debt or Wage-Led Growth: The European Integration, Journal of Economic Integration, 31: 326–352, https://doi.org/10.11130/jei.2016.31.2.326.
  • Gollin D. [2002], Getting Income Shares Right, Journal of Political Economy, 110 (2): 458–474, https://doi.org/10.1086/338747, https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/338747.
  • Hein E., Meloni W. P., Tridico P. [2021], Welfare models and demand-led growth regimes before and after the financial and economic crisis, Review of International Political Economy, 28: 1196–1223, https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2020.1744178.
  • Hein E., Vogel L. [2007], Distribution and growth reconsidered: empirical results for six OECD countries, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 32 (3): 479–511, https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bem047, https://academic.oup.com/cje/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/cje/bem047.
  • Holko M. [2017], Worker Savings, Foreign Investment and Capital Market Development: An Assessment of the Polish Government’s Action Plan from a Post-Keynesian Perspective, Gospodarka Narodowa, 291: 5–30, https://doi.org/10.33119/GN/100727.
  • Kalecki M. [1943], Political aspects of full employment, The Political Quarterly, in: Osiatyński J. (ed.), Collected Works of Michał Kalecki: 347–356, vol. 1, Clarendon Press, Oxford (reprint).
  • Kalecki M. [1954], Theory of Economic Dynamics: An Essay on Cyclical and Long-Run Changes in Capitalist Economy, Routledge, London–New York (reprint).
  • Koronowski A. [2018], Does a Low Share of Wages in GDP Lead to Stagnation? Hypothesis of Insufficient Consumption Demand, Gospodarka Narodowa, 296: 5–34, https://doi.org/10.33119/GN/102221.
  • Lupu D., Cărăusu D. N., Ifrim M. [2023], Wage share and economic growth: Evidence from Eastern Europe, Applied Economics Letters, 30 (6): 772–779.
  • Natsiopoulos K., Tzeremes N. G. [2022], ARDL bounds test for cointegration: Replicating the Pesaran et al. (2001) results for the UK earnings equation using R, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 37 (5): 1079–1090, https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.2919.
  • Onaran Ö., Galanis G. [2013], Is aggregate demand wage-led or profit-led? A global model, in: Lavoie M., Stockhammer E. (eds.), Wage-led Growth. Advances in Labour Studies, Palgrave Macmillan, London, https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137357939_4.
  • Onaran O., Obst T. [2016], Wage-led growth in the EU15 member states: The effects of income distribution on growth, investment, trade balance and inflation, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 40 (6): 1517–1551, https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bew009, https://academic.oup.com/cje/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/cje/bew009.
  • Oyvat C., Öztunalı O., Elgin C. [2020], Wage-led versus profit-led demand: A comprehensive empirical analysis, Metroeconomica, 71 (3): 458–486, https://doi.org/10.1111/meca.12284, https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/meca.12284.
  • Pesaran M. H., Shin Y., Smith R. J. [2001], Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16 (3): 289–326, https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.616, https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jae.616.
  • Setterfield M. [2002], Introduction: A dissenter’s view of the development of growth theory and the importance of demand-led growth, in: Setterfield M. (ed.), The Economics of Demand-Led Growth. Challenging the Supply-side Vision of the Long Run, Edward Elgar, London.
  • Shin H. [2019], Labor Market Institutions and Wage-Led Growth: A Panel Cointegration Approach, Seoul Journal of Economics, 32: 225–256.
  • Steindl J. [1952], Maturity and Stagnation in American Capitalism, Monthly Review Press, New York: 1976.
  • Stockhammer E. [2017], Wage-led versus profit-led demand: What have we learned? A Kaleckian-Minskyan view, Review of Keynesian Economics, 5 (1): 25–42.
  • Stockhammer E., Hein E., Grafl L. [2011], Globalization and the effects of changes in functional income distribution on aggregate demand in Germany, International Review of Applied Economics, 25 (1): 1–23.
  • Stockhammer E., Onaran Ö. [2004], Accumulation, distribution and employment: A structural VAR approach to a Kaleckian macro model, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 15 (4): 421–447, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2003.07.002.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

Biblioteka Nauki
29432299

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.ojs-doi-10_33119_GN_178337
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.