A Content Analysis of COVID-19 Pro-Vaccine and Anti-Vaccine Internet Memes in Poland

• Authors: Katarzyna Buczek

Abstracts

EN

Faced with Covid-19 people are overwhelmed with information coming from governmental or health care sources but also from social media and digital communication platforms. The Internet and especially social media are often inundated with unreliable or even false information regarding COVID-19 and vaccination against it. This seriously impacts the public health, since misinformed people may be hesitant towards the health-related measures enforced by the governments and health authorities, which, in turn, contributes to their vaccine hesitancy.The aim of the paper is to investigate the Internet memes created and popularized in Poland by supporters and opponents of COVID-19 vaccinations. The data for the study include memes published between December 2020 (vaccinations become available in Poland) to May 2021 and comes from the most popular, publicly accessible social networks and meme pages with the greatest number of followers. The content analysis relays on such variables as whether the meme is pro- or antivaccine, what persuasive appeals (emotion, fear, rationality) are used, number of reactions andshares. Additionally, the analysis looks at the thematic content of the memes and tries to specify whether the pro- and anti-vaccination memes contain more gist than verbatim information. The analysis aims to define persuasion methods that pro-vaccine and anti-vaccine groups use in their memes.

Keywords

EN

content analysis; memes; Covid-19; persuasion methods

• Publisher: Komisja Nauk Filologicznych Polskiej Akademii Nauk, Oddział we Wrocławiu
• Journal: Academic Journal of Modern Philology
• Year: 2022
• Issue: 15
• Pages: 95-106

Dates

published

2022

Contributors

author

Katarzyna Buczek

• University of Opole, Faculty of Philology

References

• Akram, Umair, Kamila Irvine, Sarah F. Allen, Jodie C. Stevenson, Jason G. Ellis ans Jennifer Drabble (2021) “Internet Memes Related to the COVID-19 Pandemic as a Potential Coping Mechanism for Anxiety.” [In:] Nature: Scientific Reports 11, 22305. doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-00857-8
• Basch Corey H., Zoe Meleo-Erwin, Joseph Fera, Christie Jaime and Charles E. Basch (2021) “A Global Pandemic in the Time of Viral Memes: COVID-19 Vaccine Misinformation and Disinformation on TikTok.” [In:] Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics 17: 8, 2373-2377. doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2021.1894896
• Bean, Sandra J. (2011) “Emerging and Continuing Trends in Vaccine Opposition Websitecontent.”[In:] Vaccine. Volume 29, Issue 10; 1874–1880. Online: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X11000193.
• Brennen, Scott J., Felix M. Simon, Philip N. Howard, Rasmus Kleis Nielsen (2020) “Types, Sources, and Claims of COVID-19 Misinformation.”[In:] RISJ [Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism] factsheet, April 2020; Reuters Institute: University of Oxford. Online: https://www.hsdl.org/?view&did=836968
• Cohen, Jacob (1960) “A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales.” [In:] Educational and Psychological Measurement. Vol. 20. No 1; 37–46.
• Cuan-Baltazar, Jose Yunam, Maria Jose Muñoz-Perez, Carolina Robledo-Vega, Maria Fernanda Perez-Zepeda, Elena Soto-Vega (2020) “Misinformation of COVID-19 on the Internet: Infodemiology Study.” [In:] JMIR Public Health and Surveillance, 6(2), e18444. Online: https://doi.org/10.2196/18444.
• Evans Jessica and Stuart Hall (eds.) (1999) Visual Culture: The Reader. SAGE Publishing
• Han, Qing, Bang Zheng, Mioara Cristea, Maximilian Agostini, Jocelyn J. Belanger, Ben Gützkow, Jannis Kreienkamp, N. Pontus Leander (2021) “Trust in Government Regarding COVID-19 and its Associations with Preventive Health Behaviour and Prosocial Behaviour during the Pandemic: A Cross-sectional and Longitudinal Study.” [In:] Psychological Medicine; 1–11. Online: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291721001306.
• Rubin Daniel Ian, Faith Agostinone Wilson (2021) A Time of Covidiocy: Media, Politics, and Social Upheaval (Critical Media Literacies Series). Leiden/Boston: BRILL.
• Dawkins, Richard (1989) The Selfish Gene, Revised Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press Ross, Andrew S., Damian J. Rivers (2018) “Discursive Deflection: Accusation of ‘Fake News’ and the Spread
• of Mis-and Disinformation in the Tweets of President Trump.” [In:] Social Media + Society. Online: https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118776010.
• Shifman, Limfor (2014). Memes in Digital Culture. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
• Soveri, Anna, Linda C. Karlsson, Jan Antfolk, Mikael Lindfelt, Stephan Lewandowsky (2021) “Unwillingness to Engage in Behaviors that Protect Against COVID-19: The Role of Conspiracy Beliefs, Trust, and Endorsement of Complementary and Alternative Medicine.” [In:] BMC Public Health, 21(1), 684. Online: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-10643-w.
• Digital Poland 2019-21. [On:] https://datareportal.com/digital-in-poland [date of access: 18.05.2022]. Eurobarometer 494 Attitudes on vaccination against COVID-19. [On:] https://op.europa.eu/en/publicationdetail/-/publication/75097d26-ee81-11eb-a71c-01aa75ed71a1 [date of access: 18.05.2022].
• Forecast of social network user numbers in Poland 2017-2026. [On:] https://www.statista.com/statistics/569024/predicted-number-of-social-network-users-in-poland/ [date of access: 18.05.2022].
• Glówny Urzad Statystyczny (Polish Statistics) Statystyka zwiazana z COVID-19. [On:] https://stat.gov.pl/covid/ [date of access: 18.05.2022]. The interrater reliabilities of Cohen’s kappa. [On:] https://www.theanalysisfactor.com/kappameasures-interrater-reliability/ [date of access: 18.05.2022].

Identifiers

DOI

10.34616/ajmp.2022.15.7

Biblioteka Nauki

2231495