Interaction specifics of political and comic in popular culture

• Authors: Olena Pavlova

Title variants

PL

Specyfika interakcji polityki i komiksu w kulturze popularnej

Abstracts

EN

The study is devoted to the analysis of the interaction of the comic and political in the logic of the popular culture organization. The latter is defined as a form of de-differentiation of mass and elite cultures. It differs from the democratic foundations of Antiquity, where the political needed forms of critical comedy under circumstances of the external institutions absence for self-correction. In the same way, the postmodern situation in the conditions of de-differentiation of all forms of culture gives populism as a new form of political and comic interaction in the conditions of the crisis of the Modernity basic institutions. Postmodern synthesis of political comic and administration of horror testifies to a dedifferentiation in popular culture, and is a symbol of the end of the social. The horror of the total chaos of personified corruption highlights the ironic evidence of their political scheme and the comic populism of their representations. Unlike the comic of Antiquity, where theatrical satire was a way of social criticism of political leaders, and, consequently, a way of increasing meaning, the comic populism of post-modernity is a way of concealing the disappearance of meaning. Although both historical versions of the interaction of political and comic work in the logic of the sign and dominant of popular culture in these periods.

Keywords

EN

comic; political; popular culture; de-differentiation; populism; post-modern

• Publisher: Uniwersytet Zielonogórski. Wydział Humanistyczny
• Journal: International Journal of Slavic Studies Transgressive, Pragmatic and Speculative Horizons of Popular Literature and Culture
• Year: 2019
• Volume: 1
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 99-108

Dates

published

2019

Contributors

author

Olena Pavlova

• Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, (Ukraine)

References

• Barthes, Roland. Rhetoric of the Image. New York Hill and Wang, Noonday, 1977, https://faculty.georgetown.edu/irvinem/theory/Barthes-Rhetoric-of-the-image-ex.pdf [access: 2.06.2018].
• Bakhtin, Mikhail. Rabelais and His World. Indiana University Press Bloomington, 1984.
• Baudrillard, Jean. The Conspiracy of Art. London The MIT Pres, Cambridge, 2005.
• Freidenberg, Olga. The Myth and Literature of Antiquity. Moscow Eastern literature, 1998.
• Hegel, Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel. Aesthetics. Lectures on Fine Art. Volume II. Oxford University Press, 1975.
• Kant, Immanuel. Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View. Cambridge Cambridge University Press, 2006.
• Lamont, `ele Michele and ´Evenot, Laurent. Rethinking Comparative Cultural Sociology. Cambrage University Press, 2000, https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/4f20/13017c94cd14498cfb8b626f76705b530abe.pdf [access: 4.03.2019].
• Lash, Scott. The Sociology of Postmodernism. London and New York: Routledge, 2013.
• Nancy, Jean-Luc. Populism, Democracy, and Neofascism: Two Essys. 2019, https://lareviewofbooks.org/article/populism-democracy-and-neofascism-twoessays/?fbclid=IwAR1HdrE47AVL3-q7J0T4JvK3dvl5EcVQ0NDmwigxPua5zhCtvPOT8u4hHs#! [access: 19.04.2019]
• Propp, Vladimir. On the Comic and Laughter. University of Toronto Press, 2009.
• Rancière, Jacques Dissensus: On Politics and Aesthetics. Continuum, 2010.
• Rumina, Marina. Aesthetics of laughter: Laughter as a virtual reality. Moscow Librokom Press. 2010.
• Virillo P. The Administration of Fear. Los Angeles Semiotext(e), 2007.

Identifiers

DOI

10.34768/q8ep-6y13

Biblioteka Nauki

1376042