Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2020 | 32 | 2(64) | 75-85

Article title

To Comply or Not To Comply:

Content

Title variants

PL
Ulegać czy nie ulegać

Languages of publication

Abstracts

PL
Poprzednie badania wykazały, że wykluczenie społeczne ogranicza zachowania prospołeczne. Aczkolwiek ludzie doświadczeni ostracyzmem są bardziej podatni na próby oddziaływania nacisku społecznego. Obecne badania sprawdzały wpływ wykluczenia na poziom uległości. Zgodnie z modelem ostracyzmu, u osóbwykluczonych następuje spadek nastroju i potrzeb. Poziom uległości był generalnie wyższy wśród badanych dotkniętych odrzuceniem (badanie 1). Tendencja do angażowania się w działania wolontaryjne była jednak wyższa kiedy uczestnicy proszeni byli o wzięcie udziału w zadaniu wymagającym zaangażowania grupowego (w stosunku do zaangażowania indywidualnego), które mieli wykonać z innymi uczestnikami niebędącymi osobami wyluczającymi (badanie 2). Otrzymane wyniki są zgodne z innymi badaniami wskazującymi, iż ludzie mają raczej tendencję do zachowań agresywnych niż prospołecznych w stosunku do osób wykluczających, oraz do odbudowania zagrożonych potrzeb poprzez starania rozwijania nowych relacji społecznych.
EN
Previous studies indicate that social exclusion reduction in prosocial behavior. However, ostracized participants tend to be more susceptible to social influence attempts. The current studies examined the effect of exclusion on compliance. In line with the need threat model of ostracism, the results indicate a decrease in mood and needs after being excluded. The compliance rate was generally greater among rejected participants (study 1). The tendency to engage in volunteering was, however, higher when participants were asked to engage in a collective (vs. individual) task, which was to be performed with other participants, than the source of ostracism (study 2). These results align with other findings indicating that people tend to respond aggressively rather than prosocially towards rejecters and tend to restorethreatened needs by making new friends.

Year

Volume

32

Issue

Pages

75-85

Physical description

Dates

published
2020

Contributors

  • SWPS Uniwersytet Humanistycznospołeczny II Wydział Psychologii we Wrocławiu
  • University of Wroclaw, Institute of Psychology
  • Norwegian Police University College, Research Department

References

  • Balliet, D., & Ferris, D. (2013). Ostracism and prosocial behavior: A social dilemma perspective. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 120, 298–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2012.04.004
  • Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497-529.
  • Bernstein, M. J., Sacco, D. F., Brown, C. M., Young, S. G., & Claypool, H. M. (2010). A preference for genuine smiles following social exclusion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 196–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.08.010
  • Bernstein, M. J., Young, S. G., Brown, C. M., Sacco, D. F., & Claypool, H. (2008). Adaptive responses to social exclusion: Social rejection improves detection of real and fake smiles. Psychological Science, 19, 981–983. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02187.x
  • Böckler, A., Hömke, P., & Sebanz, N. (2014). Invisible man: Exclusion from shared attention affects gaze behavior and self-reports. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5, 140–148. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550613488951
  • Brief, A. P., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1986). Prosocial organizational behaviors. The Academy of Management Review, 11(4), 710-725. http://www.jstor.org/stable/258391
  • Carter-Sowell, A. R., Chen, Z., & Williams, K. D. (2008). Ostracism increases social susceptibility. Social Influence, 3, 143–153.https://doi.org/10.1080/15534510802204868
  • Cialdini, R. B., & Goldstein, N. J. (2004). Social influence: Compliance and conformity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 591-621.
  • DeWall, C. N., Twenge, J. M., Gitter, S. A., & Baumeister, R. F. (2009). It’s the thought that counts: The role of hostile cognition in shaping aggressive responses to social exclusion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 45-59.
  • DeWall, C.N., Twenge, J.M., Koole, S.L., Baumeister, R.F., Marquez, A., & Reid, M.W. (2011). Automatic emotion regulation after social exclusion: Tuning to positivity. Emotion, 11(3), 623-636. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023534
  • Eisenberger, N. I., Lieberman, M. D., & Williams, K. D. (2003). Does rejection hurt? An fMRI study of social exclusion. Science, 302, 290–292.
  • Gerber J., Wheeler L. (2009). On being rejected: A meta-analysis of experimental research on rejection. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 468–488. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01158.x
  • Hartgerink, C. H. J., I., v. B., Wichters, J. M., & Williams, K. D. (2015). The Ordinal Effects of Ostracism: A Meta Analysis of 120 Cyberball Studies. Plos One, 10(5), e0127002. https://doi.org/0.1371/journal. pone.0127002
  • Kenrick, D. T., Neuberg, S. L., & Cialdini, R. B. (2010). Social psychology: Goals in interaction (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Lakin, J. L., & Chartrand, T. L. (2005). Excluding and nonconscious behavioral mimicry. In K. D. Williams, J .P. Forgas & W. von Hippel (Eds.), The social outcast: Ostracism, social exclusion, rejection, and bullying (pp. 279-295). New York: Psychology Press.
  • Leary, M. R., Kowalski, R. M., Smith, L., & Phillips, S. (2003). Teasing, rejection, and violence: Case studies of the school shootings. Aggressive Behavior, 29, 202–214. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.10061
  • Leary, M.R., Twenge, J.M., & Quinlivan, E. (2006). Interpersonal rejection as a determinant of anger and aggression. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 11-132.
  • Maner, J.K., DeWall, N.C., Baumeister, R.F., & Schaller, M. (2007). Does social exclusion motivate interpersonal reconnection? Resolving the “porcupine problem.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92 (1), 42-55.
  • Molden, D. C., Lucas, G. M., Gardner, W. L., Dean, K., & Knowles, M. L. (2009). Motivations for prevention or promotion following social exclusion: Being rejected versus being ignored. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 415–431. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012958
  • Riva, P., Williams, K. D., Torstrick, A. M., & Montali, L. (2014). Orders to shoot (a camera): Effect of ostracism on obedience. Journal of Social Psychology, 154, 208–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2014.883354
  • Smart Richman, L., & Leary, M. R. (2009). Reactions to discrimination, stigmatization, ostracism, and other forms of interpersonal rejection: A multimotive model. Psychological Review, 116, 365-383.
  • Twenge, J. M. (2005). When does social rejection lead to aggression? The influence of situations, narcissism, emotions, and replenishing connections. In K. D. Williams, J. P. Forgas & W. von Hippel (Eds.), The social outcast: Ostracism, social exclusion, rejection, and bullying (pp. 19-34). New York: Psychology Press.
  • van Beest, I., & Williams, K. D. (2006). When inclusion costs and ostracism pays, ostracism still hurts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 918-928.
  • Vorderer, P., & Schneider, F. M. (2017). Social media and ostracism. In K. D. Williams & S. A. Nida (Eds.), Ostracism, exclusion, and rejection (pp. 240-257). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
  • Wesselmann, E. D., Ren, D., & Williams, K. D. (2015). Motivations for responses to ostracism. Frontiers in Psychology, 6 (40). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00040
  • Williams, K. D., Cheung, C. K. T., & Choi, W. (2000). CyberOstracism: Effects of being ignored over the Internet. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 748-762.
  • Williams, K. D., & Jarvis, B. (2006). Cyberball: A program for use in research on ostracism and interpersonal acceptance. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 38, 174–180.
  • Williams, K. D., & Sommer, K. L. (1997). Social ostracism by one’s coworkers: Does rejection lead to loafing or compensation? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 693-706.
  • Zadro, L., Williams, K. D., & Richardson, R. (2004). How low can you go? Ostracism by a computer lowers belonging, control, self-esteem, and meaningful existence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 560-567.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

Biblioteka Nauki
2139450

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.ojs-doi-10_34862_fo_2020_2_3
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.