Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2022 | 13 | 383-399

Article title

Wokół teorii Johna R. Skoylesa. Rozważania na temat uprzywilejowania prawej półkuli w procesie czytania na wczesnym etapie rozwoju pisma – przykład pisma arabskiego

Content

Title variants

EN
Around John R. Skoyles’s theory. A consideration of the privileging of the right hemisphere in reading process at an early stage of writing development – an example of the Arabic script

Languages of publication

Abstracts

EN
The article deals with J.R. Skoyles’s theory of right hemisphere literacy which challenges the paradigm of left hemisphere dominance in the reading process and claims that in the early textual cultures the right hemisphere may have played a dominant role in reading. Applying this theory to Arab-Muslim culture, one would claim that in the early stages of the development of Arabic writing, reading may have been right-hemispheric in nature. The activity of the right hemisphere was related to the direction of writing leftwards. Moreover, Arabic script, whose reading is contextual due to the lack of short vowels, may have involved the right hemisphere to a relatively large extent in its processing and may have fostered the ‘preservation’ of its involvement even after the development of left hemisphere literacy. Finally, the presence of connections between letters in an Arabic word could also stimulate the participation of the right hemisphere in reading. At the same time, the development of left hemisphere literacy, now dominant among native Arab right-handed readers, did not necessarily have to be linked to a change in the direction of writing due to its high status in the culture linking it to the God and His word.

Year

Issue

13

Pages

383-399

Physical description

Dates

published
2022

Contributors

  • Akademia Ignatianum w Krakowie

References

  • Abu-Rabia S., Reading in a Root-Based-Morphology Language: The Case of Arabic, “Journal of Research in Reading”, 2002, Vol. 25, No 3, s. 299–309.
  • Coney J., Hemispheric Priming in a Reading Task, “Brain and Language”, 1998, Vol. 62, Issue 1, s. 43–50.
  • Daniels P., A Calligraphic Approach to Aramaic Paleography, “Journal of Near Eastern Studies”, 1984, Vol. 43, s. 55–68.
  • Felten D.L., Shetty A.N., Atlas neuroanatomii i neurofizjologii Nettera, red. wydania II polskiego A. Szczudlik, Wrocław, Elseveier Urban & Partner, 2012.
  • Godlewski G., Słowo – pismo – sztuka słowa. Perspektywy antropologiczne, Warszawa, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego, 2008.
  • Goody J., Watt I., Następstwa piśmienności, tłum. J. Jaworska, [w:] G. Godlewski, A. Karpowicz, I. Kurz et al. (red.), Communicare. Almanach Antropologiczny, 2. Oralność/ piśmienność, Warszawa, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego, 2007, s. 33–73.
  • Al-Hamouri F. et al., Brain Dynamics of Arabic Study, “Neuroreport”, 2005, Vol. 16, No 16, s. 1861–1864.
  • Hansen G.F., Word Recognition in Arabic: Approaching a Language-Specific Reading Model, [w:] E. Saiegh-Haddad, R.M. Joshi (red.), Handbook of Arabic Literacy, Heidelberg – New York – London, Springer, 2014, s. 55–76.
  • Havelock E.A., Muza uczy się pisać. Rozważania o oralności i piśmienności w kulturze Zachodu, tłum. i wst. P. Majewski, Warszawa, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego, 2006.
  • Hellige J.B., Adamson M.M., Hemispheric Differences in Processing Handwritten Cursive, “Brain and Language”, 2007, Vol. 102, Issue 3, 2007, s. 215–227.
  • Ibrahim R., Eviatar Z., The Contribution of the Two Hemispheres to Lexical Decision in Different Languages, “Behavioral and Brain Functions”, 2012, Vol. 8, Issue 3, s. 1–7.
  • de Kerckhove D., Critical Brain Processes Involved in Deciphering the Greek Alphabet, [w:] D. de Kerckhove, Ch.J. Lumsden (red.), The Alphabet and the Brain. Lateralization of Writing, Berlin – Heidelberg, Springer – Verlag, 1988, s. 401–421.
  • Kuckenburg M., Pierwsze słowo. Narodziny mowy i pisma, Warszawa, PIW, 2006.
  • Lindell A., In Your Right Mind: Right Hemisphere Contributions to Language Processing and Production, “Neuropsychology Review”, 2006, Vol. 16, s. 131–148.
  • Maass A., Suitner C., Deconchy J-P., Living in an Asymmetrical World: How Writing Direction Affects Thought and Action, London – New York, Psychology Press Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, 2014.
  • Melamed F., Zaidel E., Language and Task Effects on Lateralized Word Recognition, “Brain and Language”, 1993, Vol. 45, s. 70–85.
  • Ong, W.J., Pismo a struktura świadomości, tłum. M. Pęczak, „Przegląd Humanistyczny”, 1988, nr 4/5, [za:] Godlewski G., Mencwel A., Sulima R. (oprac.), Antropologia słowa, Warszawa, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego, 2003, s. 368–380.
  • Pae H.K., Script Effects as the Hidden Drive of the Mind, Cognition, and Culture, Cham, Springer, 2020.
  • Powell M.A., Three Problems in the History of Cuneiform Writing: Origins, Direction of Script, Literacy, “Visible Language”, 1981, Vol. 15, s. 419–440.
  • Prochwicz-Studnicka B., The Origins of High Significance of Writing in Arab-Muslim Culture, “Anthropos”, 2018, Vol. 113, s. 217–234.
  • Prochwicz-Studnicka B., The Formation and the Development of the Arabic Script from the Earliest Times until its Standardisation, “The Polish Journal of the Arts and Culture. New Series”, 2019, Vol. 9 (1), s. 53–91, online: http://www.ejournals.eu/PJACNS/1(2019).
  • Prochwicz-Studnicka B., The Accuracy of the Literacy Theory Claims in the Context of the Medieval Arab-Muslim Culture. Development of Qadiship as an Implication of the Dissemination of Writing and Literacy, “Reti Medievali Rivista”, 2021, Vol. 21, No 2, s. 47–80.
  • Schoeler G., The Genesis of Literature in Islam. From the Aural to the Read, Chippenham, Edinburgh University Press, 2011.
  • Schott G.D., Schott J.M., Mirror Writing, Left-handedness and Leftward Scripts, „Archives of Neurology”, 2004, Vol. 61, s. 1849–1851.
  • Shlain L., The Alphabet Versus the Goddess. The Conflict Between Word and Image, New York, Penguin – Compass, 1999.
  • Skoyles J.R., Alphabet and the Western Mind, “Nature”, 1984, Vol. 309, s. 409–410.
  • Skoyles J.R., Did Ancient People Read with Their Right Hemispheres? A Study in Neuropalaeographology, “New Ideas in Psychology”, 1985, Vol. 3. No. 3, s. 243–252.
  • Skoyles J.R., Right Hemisphere Literacy in the Ancient World, [w:] D. de KERCKHOVE, Ch.J. Lumsden (red.), The Alphabet and the Brain. Lateralization of Writing, Berlin – Heidelberg, Springer – Verlag, 1988, s. 362–380.
  • Skoyles J.R., Mirror Script, “Nature”, 1992, Vol. 357, s. 25–26.
  • Spitzer M., Jak uczy się mózg, Warszawa, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, 2007.
  • Vetulani J., Mózg: fascynacje, problem, tajemnice, Kraków, Homini, 2010.
  • Weeks B., Right Hemisphere Writing and Spelling, “Aphasiology”, 1995, Vol. 9, Issue 4 (1995), s. 305–319.
  • Waldie K.E., Mosley J.L., Hemispheric Specialization for Reading, “Brain and Language”, 2000, Vol. 75, Issue 1, s. 108–122.
  • Zaidel E., Schweiger A., On Wrong Hypotheses about the Right Hemisphere: Commentary on K. Patterson and D. Besner, “Is the Right Hemisphere Literate?”, “Cognitive Neuropsychology”, 1984 Vol. 1, Issue 4, s. 351–364.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

Biblioteka Nauki
29519593

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.ojs-doi-10_34864_heteroglossia_issn_2084-1302_nr13_art22
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.