Polarized disinformation. The coverage of US presidential election by Polish TV

• Authors: Mariusz Kolczyński , Róża Norstrom

Abstracts

PL

RESEARCH OBJECTIVE: Analysis of how the 2020 US presidential election was covered and framed by Polish television news programs, and whether the polarization of media and politics in Poland was reflected in the studied content, influencing its bias. THE RESEARCH PROBLEM AND METHODS: The analysis of the coverage of the US presidential campaign by three nationwide TV news programs – TVN, TVP and Polsat by using content analysis with elements of framing analysis and comparative analysis. THE PROCESS OF ARGUMENTATION: The article consists of four parts: the first explains the methodology of the study, the second discusses how presidential elections are covered and framed and what influences the national media being interested in covering foreign events. The third part presents the results of the study, and the last contains the discussion and conclusions. RESEARCH RESULTS: The coverage was dichotomous and there was a correlation between the political affiliation of the media and their choice of framing. The media used a combination of game, strategy and conflict framing that highlighted differences between Trump and Biden in terms of the election results and their personal attributes. We found that the electoral rivalry was portrayed as a conflict between the candidates and that the Polish media constructed “enemy” images of candidates and voters depending on their political sympathies. CONCLUSIONS, INNOVATIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The polarization of media and politics in Poland was reflected in the coverage of the US election. The broadcasters placed Polish political conflicts in the context of the US campaign. It shows that foreign events may be covered by national media through the prism of political bias.

Keywords

PL

presidential election; tv coverage; polarization; disinformation; media framing

• Publisher: Akademia Ignatianum w Krakowie
• Journal: Horyzonty Polityki
• Year: 2022
• Volume: 13
• Issue: 44
• Pages: 105-119

Dates

published

2022

Contributors

author

Mariusz Kolczyński

• Uniwersytet Śląski w Katowicach

• https://orcid.org/0000000203554004

author

Róża Norstrom

• Uniwersytet Śląski w Katowicach

• https://orcid.org/0000000199819988

References

• Aalberg T., Strömbäck, J., & de Vreese, C.H. (2012.) The framing of politics as strategy and game: A review of concepts, operational-izations and key findings. Journalism, 13(2), 162–178. DOI: 10.1177/1464884911427799.
• Bajomi-Lazar, P. (2014). Party Colonisation of the Media in Central and Eastern Europe. Budapest: Central European University Press.
• Binderkrantz, A.S., & Green-Pedersen, C. (2009). Policy or processes in focus? The International Journal of Press/Politics, 14(2), 166–185. DOI: 10.1177/1940161209333088.
• Capella, J.N., & Jamieson, K.H. (1997). The Spiral of Cynicism. The Press and Public Good. New York: Oxford University Press.
• DellaVigna, S., & Kaplan, E. (2007). The Fox News Effect: Media Bias and Voting. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122(3), 1187–1234. DOI: 10.1162/qjec.122.3.1187.
• Dobek-Ostrowska, B. (2019). Polish Media System in a Comparative Perspective. Media in Politics, Politics in Media. Berlin: Peter Lang.
• Dopierała, W., & Ossowski, S. (2018). Polityzacja audycji informa-cyjnych w Polsce na przykładzie „Wiadomości” TVP i „Faktów” TVN. Com.press, 2(1), 4–25. https://ruj.uj.edu.pl/xmlui/bitstream/handle/item/57674/dopierala_ossowski_polityzacja_audycji_informacyjnych_w_polsce_2018.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
• Entman, R.M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x.
• Entman, R.M. (2010). Cascading Activation: Contesting the White House’s Frame After 9/11. Political Communication, 20(4), 415–432. DOI: 10.1080/10584600390244176.
• Fong, Y.L. & Gek Koon, J.H. (2019). The South China Sea Dispute and War/Peace Journalism: A Framing Analysis of a Malaysian Newspaper. KOME: An International Journal of Pure Communication Inquiry, 7(2),17–36. DOI: 10.17646/KOME.75672.32.
• Galtung, J. (2006). Peace Journalism as an Ethical Challenge. GMJ: Mediterranean Edition, 1(2), 1–5. https://eirineftikidimosiografia.files.wordpress.com/2013/11/galtung-j-peace-journalism-as-an-ethical-challenge.pdf
• Hopmann, D.N., Van Aelst, P. & Legnante, G. (2012). Political Bal-ance in the News: A Review of Concepts, Operationalizations and Key Findings. Journalism, 13(2), 240–257. DOI: 10.1177/1464884911427804.
• Kempf, W. (2012). Peace Journalism, the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict, the German Press and the German Public. Bulletin du Centre de recherche francais a Jerusalem, 23, 1–14. https://journals.openedition.org/bcrfj/6788?lang=en
• Pokorna-Ignatowicz, K. (2013). Polski system medialny 1989–2011. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.
• Scheufele, D.A. (2000). Agenda-Setting, Priming, and Framing Revis-ited: Another Look at Cognitive Effects of Political Communica-tion. Mass Communication & Society, 3(2&3), 297–316. DOI: 10.1207/S15327825MCS0323_07.
• Seklecka, A. (2017). „Alternatywne światy”, czyli różnice w relacjonowaniu wydarzeń w „Faktach” TVN i „Wiadomościach” TVP. Political Preferences, 16, 131–152. DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.5605687.
• Semetko, H.A. & Valkenburg, P.M. (2000). Framing European poli-tics: A content analysis of press and television news. Journal of Communication, 50(2), 93–107. DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2000.tb02843.x.
• Shoemaker, J.P. & Reese, D.S. (1996). Mediating the Message: Theories of Influences on Mass Media Content. Austin: Longman.
• Valentino, N.A., Beckmann, M.N. & Buhr, T.A. (2001). A spiral of cynicism for some: The contingent effects of campaign news frames on participation and confidence in government. Political Communication, 18(4), 347–367. DOI: 10.1080/10584600152647083.

Identifiers

DOI

10.35765/hp.2284

Biblioteka Nauki

2231703