Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2022 | XIII(2 (39)) | 83-101

Article title

Outdoor education: perspective of Polish primary school teachers

Content

Title variants

Languages of publication

Abstracts

EN
The article presents the results of the research showing Polish teachers’ knowledge and experiences concerning organising outdoor education of children. The research searched for answers to the following questions: How do teachers define outdoor education? Where do they derive knowledge about it from? Do they take into account spaces and places other than the school building in the education process? What methods and forms of work with a child do they prefer? What factors facilitate and which make it difficult for them to practise outdoor education? The relationship between the selected aspects of outdoor education practised by teachers and the location of the school (city and village) was also examined. The research used the diagnostic survey method and the questionnaire technique. A proprietary questionnaire for elementary education teachers was developed. 276 respondents, in response to the questions, revealed their knowledge, their own views, and described their own activities related to the practice of outdoor education. Empirical data have shown that in Polish schools, outdoor education is practised extremely rarely, and its frequency is mainly related to the location of the facility. Incidentally conducted, it is characterised by a predominantly didaskalocentric attitude. Respondents indicate that only occasional education outside the school building results mainly from the lack of acceptance of this type of classes by the headmaster of schools and parents, and also from deficit of teachers’ competence in this area. The undertaken studies are important due to their unique nature in Poland. Moreover, they show directions of changes desired in teacher education curricula and the process of shaping parents’ awareness.

Year

Volume

Pages

83-101

Physical description

Dates

published
2022

Contributors

  • Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
  • Uniwersytet Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej w Lublinie

References

  • Antonelli, M., Barbieri, G., Donelli, D. (2019). Effects of forest bathing (shinrin-yoku) on levels of cortisol as a stress biomarker: a systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Biometeorology, 63, 1117–1134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-019-01717-x (access: 08.08.2021).
  • Blair, D. (2009). The child in the garden: an evaluative review of the benefits of school gardening. Journal of Environmental Education, 40(2), 15-38. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOEE.40.2 (access:11.10.2020).
  • Brown, M. (2008). Comfort zone: model or metaphor? Australian Journal of Outdoor Education, 12(1), 3-12.
  • California Student Assessment Project Phase Two: The Effects of Environment-Based Education on Student Achievement. SEER: Poway, CA, 2005. http://www.seer.org/pages/research/CSAPII2005.pdf (access: 12.10.2021).
  • Carrier, S. J., Thomson, M. M., Tugurian, L. P., Stevenson, K. T. (2014). Elementary Science Education in Classrooms and Outdoors: Stakeholder views, gender, ethnicity, and testing. International Journal of Science Education. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.917342 9 (access: 02.03.2021).
  • Chavez, D. J. (2009). Youth day in Los Angeles: evaluating the role in technology in children's nature activities. Children, Youth and Environments, 19(1), 102-124. http://www.colorado.edu/journals/cye (access: 15.11.2020).
  • Collado, S., Corraliza, J. A., Sorrel, M. A, Evans, G. W. (2015). Spanish version of the Children’s Ecological Behavior (CEB) scale. Psicothema, 27 (1), 82-87.
  • Dahlberg, G., Moss, P., Pence, A. (2007). Beyound quality in early childhood education and care. London: Routledge.
  • Davis, J. (Ed.) (2015). Young Children and the Environment: Early Education for Sustainability (2 nd edition). Port Melbourne, Australia: Cambridge University Press
  • Dillon, J., Dickie, I. (2012). Learning in the Natural Environment: Review of Social and Economic Benefits and Barriers. Natural England Commissioned Reports, Number 092.
  • Dyment, J. E., Bell, A. C. (2008). Grounds for movement: Green school grounds as sites for promoting physical activity. Health Education Research, 23(6), 952-962. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cym059 (access: 20.02.2020).
  • Effects of Outdoor Education Programs for Children in California. American Institutes for Research: Palo Alto, CA: 2005. http://www.seer.org/pages/research/AIROutdoorSchool2005.pdf (access: 10.10.2021).
  • Ernst, J. (2014). Early childhood educators’ use of natural outdoor settings as learning environments: an exploratory study of beliefs, practices, and barriers. Environmental Education Research, 20, 6, 735–752. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2013.833596 (access: 12.03.2020).
  • Gilbertson, K., Bates, T., McLaughlin, T., Ewert, A. (2006). Outdoor education: Methods and strategies. United States: Human Kinetics.
  • Gutman, L. M., Schoon, I. (2013). The Impact of Non-cognitive Skills on Outcomes for Young People: Literature Review. London: Institute of Education. https://helmtraining.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/Gutman-and-Schoon-Impact-of-non-cognitive-skills-on-outcomes-for-young-people-1.pdf (access: 10.03.2020).
  • Hakkarainen, K., Paavola, S., (2009). Toward a trialogical approach to learning. In: B. Schwarz, T. Dreyfus, R. Hershkowitz (Eds.) Transformation of Knowledge Through Classroom Interaction (pp. 65-80). London: Routledge.
  • Hansen, M. M., Jones, R., Tocchini, K. (2017). Shinrin-Yoku (Forest Bath) and Nature Therapy: A State of the Art Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14080851 (access: 11.11.2021).
  • Harun, M. T., Salamuddin, N. (2014). Promoting Social Skills through Outdoor Education and Assessing Its’ Effects. Asian Social Science, Vol. 10, 5, 71-78. http://www.earlychildhoodaustralia.org.au/australian_journal_of_early_childhood/about_ajec.html (access: 05.10.2017).
  • Kotte, D., Li, Q., Shin, W. S., Michalsen, A. (2019). International Handbook of Forest Therapy. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
  • Krzystek, M. (2018). Analiza tematyczna w badaniach jakościowych. Kraków: Fundacja Rozwoju Badań Społecznych.
  • Kuo, F. E., Faber-Taylor, A. F. (2004). A Potential Natural Treatment for Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: Evidence from a National Study. American Journal of Public Health, 94(9), 1580–1586.
  • Larson, L. R., Green, G. T., Castleberry, S. B. (2014). Construction and Validation of an Instrument to Measure Environmental Orientations in a Diverse Group of Children. Environment and Behavior, 43(1), 72-89.
  • Lee, J., Park, B. J., Tsunetsugu, Y., Ohira, T., Kagawa, T., Miyazaki, Y. (2011). Effect of forest bathing on physiological and psychological responses in young Japanese male subjects. Public Health, 125, 93–100.
  • Little, H., Wyver, S. (2008). Outdoor play - does avoiding the risks reduce the benefits? Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 33(2), 33-40. https://doi.org/10.1177/183693910803300206 (access: 12.12.2020).
  • Louv, R. (2010). Last Child in the Woods: Saving our Children from Nature-Deficit Disorder. London: Atlantic Books.
  • Malone, K., Waite, S. (2016). Student Outcomes and Natural Schooling report. Plymouth, Devon: Plymouth University.
  • Maynard, T., Waters, J. (2007). Learning in the outdoor environment: A missed opportunity. Early Years. An International Journal of Research and Development, 27(3), 255–265.
  • Melhuus, L. C. (2012). Outdoor day-care centers – acculturalization of nature: how do children relate to nature as educational practice? European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 20, 455-467.
  • Michaelson, V., King, M. V, Janssen, N. I, Lawal, S., Pickett, W. (2020). Electronic screening technology use and connection to nature in Canadian adolescents: a mixed methods study. Canadian Journal of Public Health: https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.17269/s41997-019-00289-y.pdf, (access: 24.02.2020).
  • Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. London: Sage.
  • Moore, R. C., Cooper Marcus, C. (2008). Healthy planet, healthy children: Designing nature into the daily spaces of childhood. In: S. Kellert, J. Heerwagen, M. Mador (Eds,), Biophilic design: Theory, science and practice. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. http://www.naturalearning.org/docs/MooreCooperMarcus_Healthy.pdf (access: 3.02.2010).
  • Niklasson, L., Sandberg, A. (2010). Children and the outdoor environment. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 18(4), 485-496. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2010.525945 (access: 11.12.2021).
  • Nundy, S. (1999). The fieldwork effect: the role and impact of fieldwork in the upper primary school. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 8(2), 190-198.
  • Prince, H. E. (2018). Changes in outdoor learning in primary schools in England, 1995 and 2017: lessons for good practice. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 19, 329-342. https://doi.org/10.1080/14729679.2018.1548363 (access: 10.12.2020).
  • Simonienko, K. (2021). Terapia lasem w badaniach i praktyce. Poznań: Silva Rerum.
  • Scott, G. W., Boyd M. (2014). A potential value of familiarity and experience: can informal Fieldwork have a lasting impact upon literacy? Education 3-13. International Journal of Primary, Elementary and Early Years Education, 42(5), 517-527.
  • Smith, P. K. (2010). Children and Play. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Stanisavljević Petrović, Z., Marković, M. (2014). Partnership between the school and the environment – teaching outside the classroom. Facta Universitatis, Series: Philosophy, Sociology, Psychology and History, 13 (2), 53-64
  • Strauss, A., Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
  • Stupnicki, R. (2015). Analiza i interpretacja danych ankietowych. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Wychowania Fizycznego.
  • Taylor, A. F., Kuo, F. E., Sullivan, W. C. (2002). Views of Nature and Self- Discipline: Evidence from Inner City Children. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 22(1-2), 49-63. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.2001.0241 (access: 15.10.2018).
  • Tipledy Lucy, S. E., Menter, H. (2021). Forest School for wellbeing: an environment in which young people can „take what they need”. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 21(2), 99-114.
  • Tuuling, L., Õun, T., Ugaste, A. (2019). Teachers’ opinions on utilizing outdoor learning in the preschools of Estonia. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 19(4), 358-370. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/329446170_Teachers%27_opinions_on_utilizing_outdoor_learning_in_the_preschools_of_Estonia (access: 12.03.2020).
  • Waite, S. (2011). Teaching and learning outside the classroom: Personal values, alternative pedagogies and standards. Education 3–13. International Journal of Primary, Elementary and Early Years Education, 39 (1), 65–82.
  • Wattchow, B., Brown, M. (2011). A Pedagogy of Place. Monash: University Publishing.
  • Wells, N. M. (2000). At Home with Nature: Effects of ‘Greenness’ on Children’s Cognitive Functioning. Environment and Behavior, 32(6), 775-795.
  • Wells, N. M., Evans, G.W. (2003). Nearby Nature: A Buffer of Life Stress Among Rural Children. Environment and Behavior, 35(3), 311-330.
  • White, R. (2004). Young Children’s Relationship with Nature: Its Importance to Children’s Development & the Earth’s Future. http://www.cnaturenet.org/02_rsrch_studies/PDFs/White_YoungChildren.pdf (access:12.03.2020).

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

Biblioteka Nauki
36806907

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.ojs-doi-10_5604_01_3001_0015_9261
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.