The integrity of the innovation process on the example of EU countries: a PLS-SEM approach

• Authors: Mateusz Borkowski , Ewa Gruszewska

Abstracts

EN

The purpose of the article is to assess the integrity of the elements of innovation processes and to measure their efficiency based on the Schumpeter trilogy concept. The research was conducted with regard to European Union (EU) countries. The paper applies the partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) method that allows the analysis of latent variables (LVs). On the basis of the PLS-SEM models for 2010 and 2020, it was concluded that innovation processes were proceeding in an integrated manner in EU countries. Not only did the modelling results indicate a positive and moderate effect of the invention inputs LV on the innovation efficiency LV, but also a positive and strong influence of innovation efficiency LV on the innovation diffusion LV in the analyzed countries in both researched years. The technological process integrity of the EU economies was lower in 2020, than in 2010. In order to improve the functioning of innovation activities it is necessary to increase technology inputs and the efficiency of their use in R&D activities. Intensification of the collaboration between scientific and research institutes and entrepreneurs is recommended. The PLS-SEM model made it possible to measure its elements and assess the integrity of technological change.

Keywords

EN

the Schumpeter trilogy; innovation; technology diffusion; PLS-SEM

• Publisher: Główny Urząd Statystyczny
• Journal: Statistics in Transition new series
• Year: 2025
• Volume: 26
• Issue: 2
• Pages: 215-234

Dates

published

2025

Contributors

author

Mateusz Borkowski

• Department of Political Economics, Faculty of Economics and Finance, University of Bialystok, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000000306444764

author

Ewa Gruszewska

• Department of Political Economics, Faculty of Economics and Finance, University of Bialystok, Poland

• https://orcid.org/0000000249430250

References

• Ahmed, P. K., Shepherd, C. D., (2010). Innovation management: Context, strategies, systems and processes. Pearson, London.
• Aydin, D., (2010). “Destructive” and “Creative” Results of Dynamic Analytical Frameworks of Marx and Schumpeter. Business and Economics Research Journal, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 17–26.
• Bento, N., Wilson, C., (2016). Measuring the duration of formative phases for energy technologies. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, Vol. 21, pp. 95– 112.
• Chesbrough, H., (2006). Open Innovation: A New Paradigm for Understanding Industrial. In H. Chesbrough, W. Vanhaverbeke, & J. West (eds.), Open innovation: Researching a new paradigm. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 15–33.
• Ciborowski, R., (2017). Territorial transfer of knowledge in terms of creative destruction. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric, Vol. 50, No. 1, pp. 269–287.
• Ciborowski, R., Skrodzka, I., (2019). International Technology Transfer, Innovation and Economic Development of European Union Countries. European Research Studies Journal, Vol. XXII, pp. 384–404.
• Ciborowski, R., Skrodzka, I. (2020). International technology transfer and innovative changes adjustment in EU. Empirical Economics, Vol. 59, pp. 1351–1371.
• Ćudić, B., Skrodzka, I., (2021). ‘Soft’ support infrastructure and the performance of small and medium-sized enterprises in European countries. Economic Annals, Vol. 66, No. 230, pp. 67–99.
• Curlee, T. R., Goel, R. K., (1989). The Transfer and Diffusion of New Technologies: A Review of the Economics Literature. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge.
• Dahms, H. F., (1995). From Creative Action to the Social Rationalization of the Economy: Joseph A. Schumpeter’s Social Theory. Sociological Theory, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 1–13.
• Diamond, A. M. J., (2019). Openness to Creative Destruction: Sustaining Innovative Dynamism. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
• Dosi, G., Nelson, R. R., (2010). Technical Change and Industrial Dynamics as Evolutionary Processes. In B. H. Hall & N. Rosenberg (eds.), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 51–127.
• Drucker, P. F., (1993). Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Practice and Principles. Harper Collins Publishers, New York.
• Eaton, J., Kortum, S., (1999). International Technology Diffusion: Theory and Measurement. International Economic Review, Vol. 40, No. 3, pp. 537–570.
• Ellwood, P., Grimshaw, P. and Pandza, K., (2017). Accelerating the Innovation Process: A Systematic Review and Realist Synthesis of the Research Literature. International Journal of Management Reviews, Vol. 19, No. 4, pp. 510–530.
• Fagerberg, J., Fosaas, M. and Sapprasert, K., (2012). Innovation: Exploring the knowledge base. Research Policy, Vol. 41, No. 7, pp. 1132–1153.
• Fernández, I. A., (2023). Innovation and international business: A systematic literature review. Heliyon, Vol., 9 No. 1, e12956.
• Fischer, C., Lušić, M., Bönig, J., Hornfeck, R. and Franke, J., (2015). Shortening Innovation Cycles by Employee Training Based on the Integration of Virtual Validation into Worker Information Systems. Procedia CIRP, Vol. 37, pp. 65–70.
• Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M. and Sarstedt, M., (2016). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). SAGE Publications, New York.
• Hair, J. F., Matthews, L. M., Matthews, R. L. and Sarstedt, M., (2017). PLS-SEM or CBSEM: Updated guidelines on which method to use. International Journal of Multivariate Data Analysis, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 107–123.
• Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M. and Sarstedt, M., (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a Silver Bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, Vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 139–152.
• Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M. and Ringle, C. M., (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, Vol. 31, No. 1, pp. 2–24.
• Hair, J. F., Sarstetd, M., Ringle, C. M. and Gudergan, S. P., (2017). Advanced Issues in Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling. SAGE Publications, New York.
• Hart, A., (2001). Mann-Whitney test is not just a test of medians: Differences in spread can be important. British Medical Journal, 323(7309), 391–393.
• Jöreskog, K. G., (1970). A General Method for Estimating a Linear Structural Equation System*. ETS Research Bulletin Series, Vol. 1970, No. 2, pp. 1–41.
• Keller, W., (2010). International Trade, Foreign Direct Investment, and Technology Spillovers. In B. H. Hall & N. Rosenberg (Eds.), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 793–829.
• Kirzner, I. M., (2009). The alert and creative entrepreneur: A clarification. Small Business Economics, Vol. 32, No. 2, pp. 145–152.
• Kline, S. J., Rosenberg, N., (1986). An Overview of Innovation. In R. Landau & N. Rosenberg (Eds.), The Positive Sum Strategy: Harnessing Technology for Economic Growth. National Academy Press, Washington. pp. 275–307.
• Kurz, H. D., (2008). Innovations and profits: Schumpeter and the classical heritage. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Vol. 67, No. 1, pp. 263–278.
• Lohmöller, J.-B., (1989). Latent Variable Path Modeling with Partial Least Squares. Springer, Berlin.
• OECD, European Union, (2018). Oslo Manual 2018: Guidelines for collecting, reporting and using data on innovation.
• Potts, J., (2019). Innovation Commons: The Origin of Economic Growth. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
• Rogers, E. M., (1983). Diffusion of Innovations. The Free Press.
• Roszkowska, D., (2013). Approaches to International Technology Transfer Measurement – An Overview. Optimum. Studia Ekonomiczne, Vol. 5, No. 65, pp. 51–63.
• Rothwell, R., (1994). Towards the Fifth-generation Innovation Process. International Marketing Review, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 7–31.
• Rothwell, R., Zegveld, W., (1985). Reindustrialization and Technology. Longman, London.
• Salavou, H., (2004). The concept of innovativeness: Should we need to focus? European Journal of Innovation Management, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 33–44.
• Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., Thiele, K. O. and Gudergan, S. P., (2016). Estimation issues with PLS and CB-SEM: Where the bias lies! Journal of Business Research, Vol. 69, No. 10, pp. 3998–4010.
• Schumpeter, J. A., (1949). The theory of Economic Development. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
• Schumpeter, J. A., (2003). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. Routledge, London.
• Skrodzka, I., (2016). Knowledge-Based Economy in the European Union: Cross- Country Analysis. Statistics in Transition, Vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 281–294.
• Utterback, J. M., (1994). Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation: How Companies Can Seize Opportunities in the Face of Technological Change. Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge.
• van der Boor, P., Oliveira, P. and Veloso, F., (2014). Users as innovators in developing countries: The global sources of innovation and diffusion in mobile banking services. Research Policy, Vol. 43, No. 9, pp. 1594–1607.
• Vargo, S. L., Akaka, M. A. and Wieland, H., (2020). Rethinking the process of diffusion in innovation: A service-ecosystems and institutional perspective. Journal of Business Research, Vol. 116, pp. 526–534.
• Wold, H., (1980). Soft modelling: Intermediate between traditional model building and data analysis. Banach Center Publications, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 333–346.

Identifiers

DOI

10.59139/stattrans-2025-023

Biblioteka Nauki

61791676