Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2023 | 21 | 1 | 48-67

Article title

Does the Perceived Authentic Leadership Have a Mediating Role in the Relationship Between Employees’ Emotional Intelligence and Self-Compassion?

Content

Title variants

PL
Czy subiektywnie postrzegane autentyczne przywództwo pełni funkcję mediatora w zależności między inteligencją emocjonalną pracowników a ich samowspółczuciem?

Languages of publication

Abstracts

PL
Cel: głównym celem badania jest ocena czy subiektywnie postrzegane autentyczne przywództwo pełni funkcję mediatora w zależności między poziomem inteligencji emocjonalnej pracowników a ich percepcją samowspółczucia. Metodologia: wszystkie dane wykorzystane w badaniu pochodzą od 175 pracowników z 12 różnych fabryk herbaty. W badaniu, którego podstawę stanowiła metoda opisowa i przekrojowa, analizę danych przeprowadzono z zastosowaniem prostej analizy mediacji Hayesa (2013) w ramach modelowania równań strukturalnych. Wyniki: wyniki analizy wskazują, że postrzegane przez pracowników autentyczne przywództwo wykazuje pozytywny związek z poziomem inteligencji emocjonalnej i percepcją samowspółczucia pracowników, a przywództwo to jest w tej zależności mediatorem. Ograniczenia/implikacje badawcze: badanie ma pewne ograniczenia. Po pierwsze, wyniki analiz nie są uogólnione na całą populację, ponieważ ich podstawą jest specyficzna próba. Należy wspomnieć, że bazują one na danych pozyskanych z różnych instytucji. Można stwierdzić, że podejście oparte na subiektywnie postrzeganym autentycznym przywództwie odgrywa pewną rolę w zależności między indywidualnymi pozytywnymi postawami, takimi jak inteligencja emocjonalna i samowspółczucie. Z tego względu przewiduje się, iż wyniki badania wniosą wkład w literaturę przedmiotu. Ponadto ograniczeniem jest koncentracja na aspekcie statystycznym badania wyłącznie przy zastosowaniu analizy mediacji. W przyszłych badaniach można przyjąć inne metody statystyczne. Oryginalność/wartość: w artykule zaprezentowano fragment wyników modelowania równań strukturalnych przeprowadzonego wśród pracowników branży herbaciarskiej w Turcji w zakresie autentycznego przywództwa.
EN
Purpose: The main purpose of this study is to evaluate whether perceived authentic leadership has a mediating role in the relationship between employees’ emotional intelligence levels and their self-compassion perceptions. Design/methodology/approach: All data in the research were obtained from 175 employees in 12 different tea factories. In the study, in which the descriptive and cross-sectional method was followed, the analysis of the data was made with Hayes’ (2013) simple mediation analysis approach within the scope of structural equation modeling. Findings: The results of the analysis show that authentic leadership perceptions of employees are positively related to their emotional intelligence levels and self-compassion perceptions, and that perceived authentic leadership plays a mediating role in this relationship. Research limitations/implications: The research has some limitations. First, the findings obtained in the course of the analyses are not generalized to the whole population, as they are collected from a specific sample. It should be mentioned that the results were obtained from different institutions. It can be said that the perceived authentic leadership approach plays a role in the relationship between individual-oriented positive attitudes such as emotional intelligence and self-compassion. Therefore, it is anticipated that the results obtained from the study contribute to the literature. In addition, handling the statistical aspect of the research only with the mediation analysis approach constitutes a separate limitation. Different statistical approaches can be adopted for future studies. Originality/value: This study presents a fragment of the results of structural equation modeling conducted for tea industry employees in Turkey on the topic of authentic leadership.

Year

Volume

21

Issue

1

Pages

48-67

Physical description

Dates

published
2023

Contributors

author
  • Department of Emergency Aid and Disaster Management, Artvin Çoruh University Faculty of Health Sciences, Artvin, Turkiye
author
  • Department of Transportation Services, Kırsehir Ahi Evran University Mucur Vocational School, Kırsehir, Türkiye

References

  • Adıgüzel, Z., & Kuloğlu, E. (2019). Examination of the effects of emotional intelligence and authentic leadership on the employees in the organizations. International Journal of Organizational Leadership, 8, 13–30. https://doi.org/10.33844/ijol.2019.60412
  • Aslan, Ş. (2008). Duygusal zekâ ve tükenmişlik arasındaki ilişkilerin araştırılması: sağlık çalışanları örneği. Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 30(1), 77–97.
  • Avolio, B. J., & Luthans, F. (2003). Authentic leadership: A positive development approach. In K.S. Cameron, J.E. Dutton, & R.E. Quinn (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship (pp. 241–261). Barrett-Koehler.
  • Bandura, A., & Adams, N. E. (1977). Analysis of self-efficacy theory of behavioral change. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 1(4), 287–310. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.37.2.122
  • Banker, D. V., & Bhal, K. T. (2020). Understanding compassion from practicing managers’ perspective: Vicious and virtuous forces in business organizations. Global Business Review, 21(1), 262–278. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150917749279
  • Barczak, N., & Eklund, R. C. (2020). The moderating effect of self-compassion on relationships between performance and subsequent coping and motivation. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 18(2), 256–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/1612197X.2018.1511620
  • Bentler, P. M. (1995). Eqs structural equations program manual. Multivariate Software.
  • Berardi, P. D. (2015). The relationship between emotional ıntelligence and authentic leadership in naval special warfare leadership [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Capella University.
  • Boyatzis, R. E. (1999). Self-directed change and learning as a necessary metacompetency for success and effectiveness in the 21st century. In R. Sims & J. G. Veres (Eds.), Keys to employee success in the coming decades (pp. 15–32). Greenwood.
  • Braun, S., & Peus, C. (2018). Crossover of work–life balance perceptions: Does authentic leadership matter? Journal of Business Ethics, 149, 875–893.
  • Cast, A. D., & Burke, P. J. (2002). A theory of self-esteem. Social Forces, 80(3), 1041–1068.
  • Castilho, P., Carvalho, S. A., Marques, S., & Pinto-Gouveia, J. (2017). Self-compassion and emotional intelligence in adolescence: A multigroup mediational study of the impact of shame memories on depressive symptoms. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 26(3), 759–768. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-016-0613-4
  • Clayton, V. (1983). Wisdom and intelligence: The nature and function of knowledge in the later years. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 15(4), 315–321.
  • Chandra, Y. (2020). Online education during COVID-19: Perception of academic stress and emotional intelligence coping strategies among college students. Asian Education and Development Studies, 10(2), 2046–3162. https://doi.org/10.1108/AEDS-05-2020-0097
  • Coopersmith, S. (1959). A method for determining types of self-esteem. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 59(1), 87.
  • Cooper, C. D., Scandura, T. A., & Schriesheim, C. A. (2005). Looking forward but learning from our past: Potential challenges to developing authentic leadership theory and authentic leaders. The Leadership Quarterly, 16(3), 475–493.
  • Di Fabio, A., & Saklofske, D. H. (2021). The relationship of compassion and selfcompassion with personality and emotional intelligence. Personality and İndividual Differences, 169, Article 110109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110109
  • Duncan, P., Green, M., Gergen, E., & Ecung, W. (2017). Authentic leadership – Is it more than emotional intelligence? Administrative Issues Journal, 7(2), 11–22. https://doi.org/ 10.5929/2017.7.2.2
  • Dutton, J. E., Workman, K. M., & Hardin, A. E. (2014). Compassion at work. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1(1), 277–304.
  • Erdemir, E. (2018). Yönetim araştırmalarında ölçek kullanımı. Journal of Management and Organization Studies, 3(2), 5–32.
  • Facteau, J. D., & Craig, S. B. (2001). Are performance appraisal ratings from different rating sources comparable? Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(2), 215. https://doi.org/10.1037//0-21-9010.86.2.215
  • Gardner, W. L., Fischer, D., & Hunt, J. G. J. (2009). Emotional labor and leadership: A threat to authenticity? The Leadership Quarterly, 20(3), 466–482. https://doi.org/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.03.011
  • Goleman, D. (2000). Emotional intelligence: Why emotional ıntelligence higher than IQ. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
  • Hallberg, U. E., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2006). “Same Same” but different? Can work engagement be discriminated from job involvement and organizational commitment? European Psychologist, 11(2), 119–127. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1027/1016-9040.11.2.119
  • Hashemi, S. E. (2019). The relationship between authentic leadership and emotional ıntelligence with the moderation ımpact of resiliency [Doctoral dissertation, The Chicago School of Professional Psychology].
  • Hayes, A. F. (2013), Mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach, The Guilford Press.
  • Heffernan, M., Quinn Griffin, M. T., McNulty, S. R., & Fitzpatrick, J. J. (2010). Selfcompassion and emotional intelligence in nurses. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 16(4), 366–373. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1440-172X.2010.01853.x
  • Horton, N. L. (2017). Does leadership style predict higher levels of self-compassion, subjective well-being, and job satisfaction? [Doctoral dissertation, The Chicago School of Professional Psychology].
  • Hu, Y., Wu, X., Zong, Z., Xiao, Y., Maguire, P., Qu, F., Wei, J., & Wang, D. (2018). Authentic leadership and proactive behavior: the role of psychological capital and compassion at work. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(1), Article 2470.
  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P.M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
  • Humphrey, R. H., Pollack, J. M., & Hawver, T. (2008). Leading with emotional labor. Journal of Managerial Psychology. 23(2), 151–168.
  • Johnson, S. L. (2019). Authentic leadership theory and practical applications in nuclear medicine. Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology, 47(3), 181–188.
  • Landy, F. J. (2005). Some historical and scientific issues related to research on emotional intelligence. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(4), 411–424.
  • Luthans, F., Luthans, K. W., Hodgetts, R. M., & Luthans, B. C. (2001). Positive approach to leadership (PAL) implications for today’s organizations. Journal of Leadership Studies, 8(2), 3–20.
  • Luthans, F. (2002). Positive organizational behavior: Developing and managing Psychological strengths. Academy of Management Executive, 16(1), 57–72. https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.2002.6640181
  • Kernis, M. H. (2003). Toward a conceptualization of optimal self-esteem. Psychological Inquiry, 14(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1401_01
  • Kim, M., & Kim, J. (2021). Corporate social responsibility, employee engagement, wellbeing and the task performance of frontline employees. Management Decision, 59(8), 2040–2056.
  • Kim, J. S., Milliman, J. F., & Lucas, A. F. (2021). Effects of CSR on affective organizational commitment via organizational justice and organization-based selfesteem. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 92, Article 102691.
  • Kotzé, M., & Nel, P. (2017). Personal factor effects on authentic leadership. Journal of Psychology in Africa, 27(1), 47–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/14330237.2016.126829
  • Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (2006). LISREL 8.80. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International Inc.
  • Maddux, J. E. (1995). Self-efficacy theory. In Self-efficacy, adaptation, and adjustment (pp. 3–33). Springer.
  • Mayer, J. D., Caruso, D. R., & Salovey, P. (2016). The ability model of emotional intelligence: Principles and updates. Emotion Review, 8(4), 290–300. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073916639667
  • Mayer, J. D., & Cobb, C. D. (2000). Educational policy on emotional intelligence: Does it make sense? Educational Psychology Review, 12, 163–183.
  • Miao, C., Humphrey, R. H., & Qian, S. (2018). Emotional intelligence and authentic leadership: A meta-analysis. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 39(5), 679–690. https://doi.org/ 10.1108/LODJ-02-2018-0066
  • Morris, J. A., & Feldman, D. C. (1996). The dimensions, antecedents, and consequences of emotional labor. Academy of Management Review, 21(4), 986–1010.
  • Neff, K. D. (2011). Self-compassion, self-esteem, and well-being. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00330.x
  • Neff, K. D. (2003). The development and validation of a scale to measure selfcompassion. Self and Identity, 2(3), 223–250.
  • Oliveira, M., Lopes, J. M., Santos, T. C. S. D. M. D., Gomes, S., & Sousa, M. (2021). Authentic leadership and its interactions with the compassion and humility of employees. Academy of Strategic Management Journal, 20(1), 1–11.
  • Patton, P. (1998). EQ Platform for achieving personal success and career. PT Mitra Media.
  • Preacher, K., Rucker, D., & Hayes, A. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42(1), 185–227.
  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010. 88.5.879
  • Polatcı, S., & Özyer, K. (2015). Duygusal emek stratejilerinin duygusal zekanın tükenmişliğe etkisindeki aracılık rolü. Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 15(3), 131–156.
  • Qiu, S., Alizadeh, A., Dooley, L. M., & Zhang, R. (2019). The effects of authentic leadership on trust in leaders, organizational citizenship behavior, and service quality in the Chinese hospitality industry. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 40, 77–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2019.06.004
  • Rahimnia, F., & Sharifirad, M. S. (2015). Authentic leadership and employee well-being: The mediating role of attachment insecurity. Journal of Business Ethics, 132, 363–377.
  • Rodriguez, J. (2016). Emotional intelligence and authentic leadership: An empirical exploration of two emerging theoretical constructs. Our Lady of the Lake University.
  • Shamir B, & Eilam G. (2005). ‘‘What’s your story?’’ A life-stories approach to authentic leadership development. The Leadership Quaterly, 16(1), 395–417.
  • Shenaar-Golan, V., & Walter, O. (2020). Do emotional ıntelligence and self-compassion affect disordered eating perceptions? American Journal of Health Behavior, 44(4), 384–391. https://doi.org/10.5993/AJHB.44.4.2
  • Şenyuva, E., Kaya, H., Işik, B., & Bodur, G. (2014). Relationship between self-compassion and emotional intelligence in nursing students. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 20(6), 588–596. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijn.12204
  • Scherer, K. R. (1993). Studying the emotion-antecedent appraisal process: An expert system approach. Cognition & Emotion, 7(3–4), 325–355.
  • Shaw, K. H., Tang, N., & Liao, H. Y. (2020). Authoritarian-benevolent leadership, moral disengagement, and follower unethical pro-organizational behavior: An investigation of the effects of ambidextrous leadership. Frontiers in Psychology, 11(590), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00590
  • Shennar-Golan, V., & Walter, O. (2018). Physical activity intensity among adolescents and association with parent–adolescent relationship and well-being. American Journal of Men’s Health, 12(5), 1530–1540. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557988318768600
  • Shlomo, N. (2018). Statistical disclosure limitation: New directions and challenges. Journal of Privacy and Confidentiality, 8(1), 1–17.
  • Tabak, A., Polat, M., Coşar, S., & Türköz, T. (2012). Otantik liderlik ölçeği: güvenirlik ve geçerlik çalışması. ISGUC The Journal of Industrial Relations and Human Resources, 14(4), 89–106.
  • Tondock, B. (2013). Does self-compassion ıncrease the authenticity of a leader? How selfcompassion can enhance authentic leadership development [Unpublished master’s thesis]. University of Westminster, London, UK.
  • Torres, E. N, & Kline, S. (2013). From customer satisfaction to customer delight: Creating a new standard of service for the hotel industry. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 25(5), 642–659.
  • Walumbwa, F. O., Peterson, S. J., Avolio, B. J., & Hartnell, C. A. (2010). An investigation of the relationships among leader and follower psychological capital, service climate, and job performance. Personnel Psychology, 63(4), 937–963.
  • Walumbwa, F.O., Avolio, B.J., Gardner, W., Wernsing, T. & Peterson, S. (2008). Authentic leadership: Development and validation of a theory-based measure. Journal of Management, 34(1), 89–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206307308913
  • Wang, D., Kan, W., Qin, S., Zhao, C., Sun, Y., Mao, W., Bian, X., Ou, Y., Zhao, Z., & Hu, Y. (2021). How authentic leadership impacts on job insecurity: The multiple mediating role of psychological empowerment and psychological capital. Stress and Health, 37(1), 60–71.
  • Wilson, J. M., Weiss, A., & Shook, N. J. (2020). Mindfulness, self-compassion, and savoring: Factors that explain the relation between perceived social support and well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 152, Article 109568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.109568
  • Yammarino, F. (2013). Leadership: Past, present, and future. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 20(2), 149–155. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051812471559
  • Yılmaz, Y., Sizer, L., & Aslan, S. (2021). Sosyal bilimlerde güncel araştırmalar. Astana Publications.
  • Yıldırım, M., & Sarı, T. (2018). Öz-şefkat ölçeği kısa formu’nun Türkçe uyarlaması: geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Journal of Abant İzzet Baysal University Education Faculty, 18(4), 2502–2517.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

Biblioteka Nauki
16539567

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.ojs-doi-10_7172_1644-9584_99_3
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.