Inwestycje w sieci o bardzo dużej przepustowości

• Authors: Andrzej Nałęcz

Abstracts

PL

W artykule oceniono unormowanie inwestycji w sieci o bardzo dużej przepustowości w Europejskim kodeksie łączności elektronicznej w świetle istniejącej literatury naukowej. Zauważono, że zarówno osłabienie regulacji asymetrycznej, jak i wzmocnienie regulacji symetrycznej mogą w praktyce mieć konsekwencje dla jakości i dostępności detalicznych usług łączności elektronicznej. Implementacja EKŁE w prawie polskim musi więc być przemyślana i staranna. Zauważono, że nie wymaga ona uchwalenia nowej ustawy w miejsce prawa telekomunikacyjnego z 2004 roku. Ustawa ta wymaga jednak nowelizacji i w tym zakresie wskazano, które przepisy należy zmienić, a które dodać.

Keywords

PL

Europejski kodeks łączności elektronicznej; sieci o bardzo dużej przepustowości; prawo telekomunikacyjne

• Publisher: Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydział Nauk Ekonomicznych
• Journal: internetowy Kwartalnik Antymonopolowy i Regulacyjny
• Year: 2020
• Volume: 9
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 19-36

Dates

published

2020

Contributors

author

Andrzej Nałęcz

• Uniwersytet Warszawski, Wydział Zarządzania

• https://orcid.org/0000000305532084

References

• Aghion, P., Bloom, N., Blundell, R., Griffi th, R. i Howitt, P. (2005). Competition and Innovation: An Inverted-U Relationship. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120(2), 701–728. Pozyskano z: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25098750?origin=JSTOR-pdf (10.07.2019).
• Araújo, M., Ekenberg, L. i Confraria, J. (2018). Rural networks cost comparison between 5G (mobile) and FTTx (fixed) scenarios. 2018 IEEE 29th Annual International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC). https://doi.org/10.1109/PIMRC.2018.8580981.
• Bertschek, I., Briglauer, W., Hüschelrath, K., Kauf, B. i Niebel, T. (2015). The Economic Impacts of Broadband Internet: A Survey. Review of Network Economics, 14(4), 201–227. https://doi.org/10.1515/rne-2016-0032.
• Bourreau, M., Feasey, R. i Hoernig, S. (2017). Demand-Side Policies to Accelerate the Transition to Ultrafast Broadband. Centre on Regulation in Europe (CERRE). Pozyskano z: https://www.cerre.eu/sites/cerre/files/171212_CERRE_BroadbandDemand_FinalReport.pdf (10.07.2019).
• Bourreau, M., Grzybowski, L. i Hasbi, M. (2018). Unbundling the Incumbent and Entry into Fiber: Evidence from France. CESifo Working Paper No. 7006. Pozyskano z: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3198479## (10.07.2019).
• Briglauer, W., Ecker, G. i Gugler, K. (2013). The impact of infrastructure and service-based competition on the deployment of next generation access networks: Recent evidence from the European member states. Information Economics and Policy, 25(3), 142–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoecopol.2012.11.003.
• Briglauer, W., Camarda, E.M. i Vogelsang, I. (2018). Path Dependencies versus Efficiencies in Regulation: Evidence from “Old” and “New” Broadband Markets in the EU. ZEW Discussion Paper No. 18-051. Pozyskano z: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3050661 (10.07.2019).
• Briglauer, W. i Cambini, C. (2017). The Role of Regulation in Incentivizing Investment in New Communications Infrastructure. ZEW fi nal report. Pozyskano z: http://ftp.zew.de/pub/zew-docs/gutachten/BriglauerCambiniDeutscheTelekomApril2017.pdf (10.07.2019).
• Briglauer, W. i Gugler, K. (2019). Go for Gigabit? First Evidence on Economic Benefits of High-Speed Broadband Technologies in Europe. Journal of Common Market Studies. wersja online przed publikacją w czasopiśmie. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12872.
• Briglauer, W., Stocker, V. i Whalley, J. (2018). Public Policy Targets in EU Broadband Markets: The Role of Technological Neutrality. 29th European Regional Conference of the International Telecommunications Society: “Towards a digital future: Turning technology into markets?”, Trento, Italy, 1st–4th August 2018. Pozyskano z: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/184936 (10.07.2019).
• Cave, M. i Shortall, T. (2016). How incumbents can shape technological choice and market structure – the case of fixed broadband in Europe. Info 18(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1108/info-09-2015-0044.
• Crawford, S. i Scott, B. (2015). Be Careful What You Wish For: Why Europe Should Avoid the Mistakes of US Internet Access Policy. Policy brief, Stiftung Neue Verantwortung, Berlin. Pozyskano z: https://www.stiftung-nv.de/sites/default/fi les/us-eu.internet.access.policy.pdf (10.07.2019).
• Feasey, R. i Cave, M. (2017). Policy towards competition in high-speed broadband in Europe, in an age of vertical and horizontal integration and oligopolies. Centre for Regulation in Europe (CERRE). Pozyskano z: https://www.cerre.eu/sites/cerre/fi les/170220_CERRE_BroadbandReport_Final.pdf (10.07.2019).
• Frias, Z. i Pérez Martínez, J. (2019). Rollout and regulation of Fiber-To-The-Premises networks. Insights from the Spanish Case. Telecommunications Policy, 43(3), 225–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2018.07.005.
• Gerli, P., Van der Wee, M., Verbrugge, S. i Whalley, J. (2018). The involvement of utilities in the development of broadband infrastructure: A comparison of EU case studies. Telecommunications Policy, 42(9), 726–743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2018.03.001.
• Grzybowski, L., Hasbi, M. i Liang, J. (2018). Transition from Copper to Fiber Broadband: The Role of Connection Speed and Switching Costs. Information Economics and Policy, 42, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoecopol.2017.07.001.
• Haller, S.A. i Lyons, S. (2019). Effects of broadband availability on total factor productivity in service sector firms: Evidence from Ireland. Telecommunications Policy, 43(1), 11–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2018.09.005.
• Haucap, J. i Marcus, J.S. (2005). Why regulate? Lessons from New Zealand. IEEE Communications Magazine, 43(11), 14–16. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.2005.1541683.
• Koboldt, C., Weekes, M. i Ciborowska, A. (2016). Europe’s Next Generation Networks: The Essential Role of Pro-Competitive Access Regulation. Internet Economy Foundation. Pozyskano z: https://www.vatm.de/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/IEF.pdf (10.07.2019).
• Marcus, J.S., Bocarova, V. i Petropoulos, G. (2017). Incentives for investment in fast broadband: How much can be expected from the proposed European Code? 28th Regional Conference of the International Telecommunications Society: “Competition and Regulation in the Information Age”, Passau, Germany, July 30 – August 2, 2017. Pozyskano z: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/169483 (10.07.2019).
• Maxwell, W. i Bourreau, M. (2015). Technology neutrality in Internet, telecoms and data protection legislation. Computer and Telecommunications Law Review, 21(1), 1–4.
• Nitsche, R. i Wiethaus, L. (2011). Access Regulation and Investment in Next Generation Networks: A Ranking of Regulatory Regimes. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 9(2), 263–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2010.07.002.
• OECD. (2015). Triple and Quadruple Play Bundles of Communication Services. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers, No. 23. https://doi.org/10.1787/23074957.
• Parcu, P.L. (2016). Policy suggestions on fast and ultra-fast broadband targets for the European Commission. W: Florence School of Regulation. The future of broadband policy: Public targets and private investment (s. 52–58). Florencja: European University Institute. https://doi.org/10.2870/884566.
• Piątek, S. (2010). Polityka regulacyjna dotycząca sieci dostępowych nowej generacji. Telekomunikacja i Techniki Informacyjne, 3–4, 47–63.
• Rajabiun, R. i Middleton, C. (2015). Regulation, investment and efficiency in the transition to next generation networks: Evidence from the European Union. Telematics and Informatics, 32(2), 230–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2014.09.001.
• Reichl, W., Ruhle, E.-W., Lundborg, M. i Ehrler, M. (2012). Virtual unbundling: The basis for competition in next generation access networks? 23rd European Regional Conference of the International Telecommunication Society, Vienna, Austria, 1–4 July 2012. Pozyskano z: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/60360 (10.07.2019)
• Renda, A. (2017). Reforming E-Communications Services: A Critical Assessment. Directorate General for Internal Policies, Policy Department A: Economic and Scientific Policy, European Parliament. Pozyskano z: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/IDAN/2017/595348/IPOL_IDA(2017)595348_EN.pdf (10.07.2019).
• Ribeiro, V.M. (2017). Flexibility in the European telecommunications industry. Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance, 19(5), 397–409. https://doi.org/10.1108/DPRG-04-2017-0016.
• Vogelsang, I. (2019). Has Europe missed the endgame of telecommunications policy? Telecommunications Policy, 43(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2018.12.006.
• Vu, K.M. (2019). The internet-growth link: An examination of studies with confl icting results and new evidence on the network effect. Telecommunications Policy, 43(5), 474–483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2019.04.002.
• Webb, W. (2019). The 5G Myth. When Vision Decoupled from Reality. Boston: de Gruyter.

Identifiers

DOI

10.7172/2299-5749.IKAR.1.9.2

Biblioteka Nauki

2171465