Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2018 | 2(8) | 33-45

Article title

Antecedents of Word-of-Mouth Communication and Purchase Intention on Facebook

Content

Title variants

Languages of publication

Abstracts

EN
More and more business customers use social media to express their opinions about products, services and brands. This study aims to make a step further in understanding consumer engagement in electronic word of mouth (eWOM) on Facebook and its impact on recommending and purchasing products. To test our conceptual framework, structural equation modeling techniques have been applied to data collected through a self-administrated survey addressed to 640 Facebook users from Romania. Our model shows that Facebook’s perceived usefulness infl uences customer brand engagement, which in turn has an important effect on the intention to purchase the brand and recommend it to others (word of mouth). Therefore, people who use Facebook as a source of information about products and services are top eWOM providers. A brand that seeks to build authority on Facebook should look for eWOM providers, convert them into fans and “feed” them with attention-grabbing information that is worth spreading. This way, most of the fans will provide free word-of-mouth advertising, becoming true brand ambassadors. Our study has established that Facebook’s perceived usefulness not only engages online users with brands, but also makes this medium a perfect eWOM tool: it builds trust in friends’ recommendations, and eventually, makes the users sincere supporters of the brands they like.

Contributors

  • University “Alexandru Ioan Cuza” Iaşi, Romania
  • University “Alexandru Ioan Cuza” Iaşi, Romania

References

  • Akar, E. & Topçu, B. (2011). An examination of the factors infl uencing consumers’ attitudes toward social media marketing. Journal of Internet Commerce, 10(1), 35–67.
  • Alghamdi, M., Aldridge, C., & Long, A. (2011). The infl uence of Facebook friends on consumers’ purchase decisions. Postgraduate Day, p. 25.
  • Anderson, J. & Gerbing, D. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411–423.
  • Awad, N. & Ragowsky, A. (2008). Establishing trust in electronic commerce through online word of mouth: An examination across genders. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(4), 101–121.
  • Bickart, B. & Schindler, R. (2001). Internet forums as infl uential sources of consumer information. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 15(3), p. 31.
  • Bughin, J., Doogan, J., & Vetvik O.J. (2010). A new way to measure word-of-mouth marketing. McKinsey Quarterly, 2, 113–116.
  • Campbell, C., Ferraro, C., & Sands, S. (2014). Segmenting consumer reactions to social network marketing. European Journal of Marketing, 48(3/4), 432–452.
  • Champoux, V., Durgee, J., & McGlynn, L. (2012). Corporate Facebook pages: When “fans” attack. Journal of Business Strategy, 33(2), 22–30.
  • Chari, S., Christodoulides, G., Presi, C., Wenhold, J., & Casaletto, J. (2016). Consumer trust in user-generated brand recommendations on Facebook. Psychology & Marketing, 33(12), 1071–1081.
  • Cheung, C. & Lee, M. (2012). What drives consumers to spread electronic word of mouth in online consumeropinion platforms. Decision Support Systems, 53(1), 218–225.
  • Chiosa, A.R. & Anastasiei, B. (2015). The segmentation of Facebook users from Romania by WOM behavior. Annals of “Alexandru Ioan Cuza” University – Economy Series, 5, 160–9.
  • Cho, Y. & Sagynov, E. (2015). Exploring factors that affect usefulness, ease of use, trust, and purchase intention in the online environment. International Journal of Management & Information Systems (IJMIS), 19(1), p. 21.
  • Chu, S. & Kim, Y. (2011). Determinants of consumer engagement in electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM) in social networking sites. International Journal of Advertising, 30(1), 47–75.
  • Davis, F. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), p. 319.
  • de Vries, L., Gensler, S., & Leefl ang, P. (2012). Popularity of brand posts on brand fan pages: An investigation of the effects of social media marketing. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 26(2), 83–91.
  • Fan, Y., Miao, Y., Fang, Y., & Lin, R. (2013). Establishing the adoption of electronic word-of-mouth through consumers’ perceived credibility. International Business Research, 6(3).
  • Flavián, C., Guinalíu, M., & Gurrea, R. (2006). The role played by perceived usability, satisfaction and consumer trust on website loyalty. Information & Management, 43(1), 1–14.
  • Fornell, C. & Larcker, D. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), p. 39.
  • Hamouda, M. & Tabbane, R. (2013). Impact of electronic word of mouth evaluation on purchase intention. International Journal of Online Marketing, 3(2), 20–37.
  • Hassanein, K. & Head, M. (2007). Manipulating perceived social presence through the web interface and its impact on attitude towards online shopping. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 65(8), 689–708.
  • Hsiao, K., Chuan-Chuan Lin, J., Wang, X., Lu, H., & Yu, H. (2010). Antecedents and consequences of trust in online product recommendations. Online Information Review, 34(6), 935–953.
  • Hutter, K., Hautz, J., Dennhardt, S., & Füller, J. (2013). The impact of user interactions in social media on brand awareness and purchase intention: The case of MINI on Facebook. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 22(5/6), 342–351.
  • Igbaria, M. (1995). The effects of self-effi cacy on computer usage. Omega, 23(6), 587–605.
  • Jeong, E. & Jang, S. (2011). Restaurant experiences triggering positive electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM) motivations. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 30(2), 356–366.
  • Karahanna, E. & Straub, D. (1999). The psychological origins of perceived usefulness and ease-of-use. Information & Management, 35(4), 237–250.
  • Keller, K.L. (2001). Building customer-based brand equity: A blueprint for creating strong brands. Marketing Science Institute.
  • Keller, K.L. (2009). Building strong brands in a modern marketing communications environment. Journal of Marketing Communications, 15(2–3), 139–155.
  • Liang, T., Ho, Y., Li, Y., & Turban, E. (2011). What drives social commerce: The role of social support and relationship quality. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 16(2), 69–90.
  • Lu, Y., Zhao, L., & Wang, B. (2010). From virtual community members to C2C e-commerce buyers: Trust in virtual communities and its effect on consumers’ purchase intention. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 9(4), 346–360.
  • Malciute J. & Chrysochou, P. (2013). Customer brand engagement on online social media platforms: A conceptual model and empirical analysis. Paper presented at 42nd European Marketing Academy (EMAC).
  • Mangold, W. & Faulds, D. (2009). Social media: The new hybrid element of the promotion mix. Business Horizons, 52(4), 357–365.
  • McKnight, D., Choudhury, V., & Kacmar, C. (2002). Developing and validating trust measures for e-commerce: An integrative typology. Information Systems Research, 13(3), 334–359.
  • Morgan-Thomas, A. & Veloutsou, C. (2013). Beyond technology acceptance: Brand relationships and online brand experience. Journal of Business Research, 66(1), 21–27.
  • Morwitz, V., Steckel, J., & Gupta, A. (2007). When do purchase intentions predict sales?. International Journal of Forecasting, 23(3), 347–364.
  • Newman, M. (2003). The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Review, 45(2), 167–256.
  • Park, D. & Kim, S. (2008). The effects of consumer knowledge on message processing of electronic word-of-mouth via online consumer reviews. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 7(4), 399–410.
  • Ping, R.A. (2009). Is there any way to improve Average Variance Extracted (AVE) in a Latent Variable (LV) X (Revised)?. Retrieved from http://www.wright.edu/~robert.ping/ImprovAVE2.doc Pöyry, E., Parvinen, P., & Malmivaara, T. (2013). Can we get from liking to buying? Behavioral differences in hedonic and utilitarian Facebook usage. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 12(4), 224–235.
  • See-To, E. & Ho, K. (2014). Value co-creation and purchase intention in social network sites: The role of electronic word-of-mouth and trust – A theoretical analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 31, 182–189.
  • Smith, T., Coyle, J., Lightfoot, E., & Scott, A. (2007). Reconsidering models of infl uence: The relationship between consumer social networks and word-of-mouth effectiveness. Journal of Advertising Research, 47(4), 387–397.
  • Soh, H., Reid, L., & King, K. (2009). Measuring trust in advertising. Journal of Advertising, 38(2), 83–104.
  • Willemsen, L., Neijens, P., Bronner, F., & de Ridder, J. (2011). “Highly recommended!” The content characteristics and perceived usefulness of online consumer reviews. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17(1), 19–38.
  • Wilson, E. & Sherrell, D. (1993). Source effects in communication and persuasion research: A meta-analysis of effect size. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 21(2), 101–112.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

Biblioteka Nauki
2012517

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.ojs-doi-10_7172_2449-6634_jmcbem_2018_2_3
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.