Who is an expert? A corpus-assisted analysis of the expert in Swedish Covid-19 discourse

• Authors: Magnus P. Ängsal

Abstracts

EN

This article explores a prevalent thematic strand of the Swedish public discourse on Covid-19 pandemic strategies. Analyzing the construction and role of the expert as it has been played out in the news media coverage of Covid-19 in four leading Swedish daily newspapers throughout the first two months of the pandemic in 2020 (February and March), the contribution asks who counts as a trustworthy expert, and to what extent such ascriptions are used in debates about the Swedish coronavirus strategy, which has aroused much interest and criticism. One of the important findings is the concept of a reliable and rational expert who is, primarily, a Swedish epidemiologist. Also noteworthy is the fact that the role of the expert and the very word expert seem to be under negotiation. This contribution is situated within the framework of discourse linguistics and explores segments of discourse understood as collectively shared knowledge. A partly corpus-assisted methodology is used. The study aims to link linguistic utterances on the expert’s role in the pandemic with the level of important social actors in the course of the pandemic in Sweden.

Keywords

EN

Covid-19; pandemic; discourse; corpus; experts; pragmatics

• Publisher: Instytut Germanistyki Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego oraz Instytut Filologii Germańskiej Uniwersytetu Rzeszowskiego
• Journal: tekst i dyskurs - text und diskurs
• Year: 2021
• Issue: 15
• Pages: 171-209

Dates

published

2021

Contributors

author

Magnus P. Ängsal

References

• Andersen Christiane et al. (2018): Erkenntnis als soziale Praxis. Ludwik Flecks Wissenschaftstheorie aus sprachwissenschaftlicher Sicht. In: Andersen Christiane, Fix Ulla, Schiewe Jürgen (eds.): Denkstile in der deutschen Sprachwissenschaft. Berlin, 11-65. Google Scholar
• Attardo Salvatore (2000): Irony as relevant inappropriateness. Journal of Pragmatics, 32:6, 793-826. Google Scholar
• Bjereld Ulf, Demker Marie (2020): Sanningen som politiskt slagfält. Stockholm. Google Scholar
• Bubenhofer Noah et al. (2020): Von Grenzen und Welten. Eine korpuspragmatische Analyse COVID-19-Diskursanalyse. Aptum. Zeitschrift für Sprachkritik und Sprachkultur, 16:2/3, 156-165. Google Scholar
• Ekengren Oscarssson Henrik (2013): Väljare är inga dumbommar. Politologerna. Statsvetenskaplig analys av svensk politik. Available: https://politologerna.wordpress.com/2013/12/10/valjare-ar-inga-dumbommar/ [retrieved 12 January 2021]. Google Scholar
• Fleck Ludwik (1980 |1935]): Entstehung und Entwicklung einer wissenschaftlichen Tatsache. Einführung in die Lehre vom Denkstil und Denkkollektiv. Mit einer Einleitung herausgegeben von Lothar Schäfer und Thomas Schnelle. Frankfurt am Main. Google Scholar
• Gardt Andreas (2007): Diskursanalyse. Aktueller theoretischer Ort und methodische Möglichkeiten. In: Warnke Ingo H. (ed.): Diskurslinguistik nach Foucault. Theorie und Gegenstände. Berlin/New York, 28-52. Google Scholar
• Ghersetti Marina, Odén Thomas (2021): Coronapandemin våren 2020. En undersökning av nyheter och opinion. Myndigheten för samhällsskydd och beredskap. Available: https://www.msb.se/sv/publikationer/coronapandemin-varen-2020.-en-undersokning-av-nyheter-och-opinion/ [retrieved 3 May 2021]. Google Scholar
• Giritli Nygren Katarina, Olofsson Anna (2020): Managing the Covid-19 pandemic through individual responsibility: the consequences of a world risk society and enhanced ethopolitics. Journal of Risk Research, 23:7-8, 1031-1035. Available: https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2020.1756382 [retrieved 12 January 2021]. Google Scholar
• Giritli Nygren Katarina, Olofsson Anna (2021): Swedish exceptionalism, herd immunity and the welfare state: A media analysis of struggles over the nature and legitimacy of the COVID-19 pandemic strategy in Sweden. Current Sociology, 1-18. Available: https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392121990025 [retrieved 3 May 2021]. Google Scholar
• Hess-Lüttich Ernest W.B. (2020): Corona, Krise und Diskurs. Einige Ethische Implikationen der deutschen Debatte zur Covid-Pandemie. In: tekst i dyskurs – text und diskurs, 13, 217-234. Available: https://doi.org/10.7311/tid.13.2020.11 [retrieved 12 January 2021]. Google Scholar
• Johansson Karin (2021): Der schwedische Sonderweg. Eine linguistische Diskursanalyse zur Darstellung der schwedischen Coronastrategie in der deutschen Presse. Gothenburg [Unpublished bachelor’s thesis, Department of Languages and Literatures, University of Gothenburg]. Google Scholar
• Johansson Bengt, Vigsø Orla (2021): Sweden: lone hero or stubborn outlier? In: Lilleker Darren, Coman Ioana A., Gregor Miloš, Novelli Edoardo (eds.): Political Communication and COVID-19. Governance and Rhetorik in Times of Crisis. London, 155-164. Google Scholar
• Jung Matthias (1996): Linguistische Diskursgeschichte. In: Böke Karin, Jung Matthias, Wengeler Martin (eds.): Öffentlicher Sprachgebrauch. Praktische, theoretische und historische Perspektiven. Georg Stötzel zum 60. Geburtstag gewidmet. Opladen, 453-472. Google Scholar
• Kantar Sifo (2020): Orvesto Konsument. Räckviddsrapport 2020:1. Stockholm. Available: https://www.kantarsifo.se/rapporter-undersokningar/orvesto-konsument-20201 [retrieved 12 January 2021]. Google Scholar
• Karlsten Emanuel (2020): Johan Giesecke fakturerar Folkhälsomyndigheten för medverkan i Aktuellt – “Felaktigt och kommer inte betalas ut”. Emanuel Karlsten. Journalistik om det som inte funnit annan plats 27 May 2020. Available https://emanuelkarlsten.se/johan-giesecke-fakturerar-folkhalsomyndigheten-for-medverkan-i-aktuellt-felaktigt-och-kommer-inte-betalas-ut/ [retrieved 3 May 2021]. Google Scholar
• Kilian Jörg, Niehr Thomas, Schiewe Jürgen (2016): Sprachkritik. Ansätze und Methoden der kritischen Sprachbetrachtung. 2., überarbeitete und aktualisierte Auflage. Berlin/Boston. Google Scholar
• Lapin Lapo (2021): Wold istället för vetenskap. Kvartal 15 April 2021. Available: https://kvartal.se/artiklar/wold-i-stallet-for-vetenskap/ [retrieved 3 May 2021]. Google Scholar
• Larsson Petter J. (2020): Anders Tegnell hyllar brittisk tanke kring flockimmunitet: “Dit vi behöver komma”. Aftonbladet 16 March 2020. Available: https://www.aftonbladet.se/nyheter/a/6j7vaO/anders-tegnell-hyllar-brittisk-tanke-kring-flockimmunitet-dit-vi-beh [retrieved 12 January 2021]. Google Scholar
• Leeuwen Theo van (1996): The representation of social actors. In: Caldas-Coulthard Carmen Rosa, Coulthard, Malcolm (eds.): Texts and Practices. Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis. London, 32-70. Google Scholar
• Leeuwen Theo van (2007): Legitimation in discourse and communication. Discourse & Communication, 1:1, pp. 91-112. Available: https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481307071986 [retrieved 3 May 2021]. Google Scholar
• Ludvigsson Jonas F. (2020): The first eight months of Sweden’s COVID-19 strategy and the key actions and actors that were involved. Acta Paediatrica, 109:12, 2459-2471. Available: https://doi.org/10.1111/apa.15582 [retrieved 12 January 2021]. Google Scholar
• Mackay Rowan R (2015): Multimodal legitimation: Selling Scottish independence. Discourse & Society, 26:3, 323-348. Available: https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926514564737 [retreived 3 May 2021]. Google Scholar
• Nagel Melanie, Schäfer Melanie (2020): Netzwerke der Corona-Kontroverse – gibt es das noch? Ein erster Blick in die Presse. In: Stegbauer Christian, Clemens Iris (eds.): Corona-Netzwerke – Gesellschaft im Zeichen des Virus. Wiesbaden, 243-257. Google Scholar
• Petridou Evangelia (2020): Politics and administration in times of crisis: Explaining the Swedish response to the COVID-19 crisis. European Policy Analysis, 6:2, 147-158. Available: https://doi.org/10.1002/epa2.1095 [retrieved 12 January 2021]. Google Scholar
• Pierre Jon (2016): Introduction: The decline of Swedish exceptionalism? In: Pierre Jon (ed.): The Oxford Handbook of Swedish Politics. Oxford, 1-16. Google Scholar
• Pierre Jon (2020): Nudges against pandemics: Sweden’s COVID-19 containment strategy in perspective. Policy and Society, 39:3, 478-493. Available: https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2020.1783787 [retrieved 12 January 2021]. Google Scholar
• Piller Ingrid, Zhang Jie, Li Jia (2020): Linguistic diversity in a time of crisis: Language challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic. Multilingua, 39:5, 503-515. Available: https://doi.org/10.1515/multi-2020-0136 [retrieved 3 May 2021]. Google Scholar
• Reisigl Martin, Wodak Ruth (2009): The Discourse-Historical Approach (DHA). In: Wodak Ruth, Meyer Michael (eds.): Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. 2nd revised edition. London/Thousand Oaks/New Delhi, 87-121. Google Scholar
• Rosling Hans, Rosling Ola, Rosling Rönnlund Anna (2018): Factfullness. Tio knep som hjälper dig att förstå världen. Stockholm. Google Scholar
• Schröter Melanie (2015): Besondere Wörter III: Schlagwörter in der öffentlich-politischen Auseinandersetzung. In: Haß Ulrike, Storjohann Petra (eds.): Handbuch Wort und Wortschatz. Berlin/Boston, 394-412. Google Scholar
• Seiler Brylla (2019): Der schwedische “Meinungskorridor”. Metapragmatische Verhandlungen über Sagbarkeitsgrenzen im öffentlichen Diskurs Schwedens. In: OBST, 95, 21-42. Google Scholar
• Seiler Brylla (2020): Kleiner Elch. Covid-19 in Schweden. Aptum. Zeitschrift für Sprachkritik und Sprachkultur, 16:2/3, 175-181. Google Scholar
• Semino Elena (2021): “Not Soldiers but Fire-Fighters” – Metaphors and Covid-19. Health Communication, 36:1, 50-58. Available: https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2020.1844989 [retrieved 12 January 2021]. Google Scholar
• Spitzmüller Jürgen (2013): Metapragmatik, Indexikalität, soziale Registrierung. Zur diskursiven Konstruktion sprachideologischer Positionen. Zeitschrift für Diskursforschung/Journal for Discourse Studies, 1:3, 263-287. Google Scholar
• Spitzmüller Jürgen (2021): His Master’s Voice. Die soziale Konstruktion des ’Laien’ durch den ’Experten’. In: Hoffmeister Toke, Hundt Markus, Naths Saskia (eds.): Laien, Wissen, Sprache. Theoretische, methodische und domänenspezifische Perspektiven. Berlin/Boston, 1-23. Available: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110731958-001 [retrieved 30 August 2021]. Google Scholar
• Spitzmüller Jürgen, Warnke Ingo H. (2011): Diskurslinguistik. Eine Einführung in Theorien und Methoden der transtextuellen Sprachanalyse. Berlin/Boston. Google Scholar
• Svensk Ordbok (2009). Available: https://svenska.se/ [retrieved 12 January 2021]. Google Scholar
• Vasterman Peter LM, Ruigrok Nel (2013): Pandemic alarm in Dutch media: Media coverage of the 2009 influenza A (H1N1) pandemic and the role of the expert sources. European Journal of Communication, 28:4, 436-453. Available: https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323113486235 [retrieved 12 January 2021]. Google Scholar
• Wengeler Martin (2015): Patterns of argumentation and the heterogeneity of social knowledge. Journal of Language and Politics, 14:5, 689-711. Available: https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.14.5.04wen [retrieved 12 January 2021]. Google Scholar
• Wennström Johan (2020): Åsiktskorrodoren är ett verkligt problem. Svenska Dagbladet 18 May 2020. Available: https://www.svd.se/asiktskorridoren-ar-ett-verkligt-problem [retrieved 12 January 2021]. Google Scholar
• Westberg Gustav (2020): Corona, vaghet och skam. Om myndighetskommunikation och affekt på sociala medier. Språk och stil NF, 30, 5-31. Google Scholar
• WHO (2021): Strategic and Technical Advisory Group for Infectious Hazards (STAG-IH). Available: https://www.who.int/about/people/biography/dr-johan-giesecke [retrieved 12 January 2021]. Google Scholar
• Wolodarski Peter (2020): Stäng ned Sverige för att skydda Sverige. Dagens Nyheter 13 March 2020. Available: https://www.dn.se/ledare/peter-wolodarski-stang-ned-sverige-for-att-skydda-sverige/ [retrieved 12 January 2021]. Google Scholar

Identifiers

DOI

10.7311/tid.15.2021.07

Biblioteka Nauki

2119588