Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2022 | 22 | 2 | 69-89

Article title

Gamified mobile-assisted formative assessment for reviving undergraduate learners’ overall language proficiency: a quasi-experimental study

Content

Title variants

Languages of publication

Abstracts

EN
The lack of opportunities to practice the English language outside the English as a Foreign Language (EFL) classroom can prevent English language learners (ELLs) from promoting their language proficiency to high standards. This lack makes the progress from one level of English to the next one a hard mission for Arab students. Subsequently, students’ mastery of the English language is often not expected to occur without frequent practice and organized formative assessment. To enrich such methods of assessment, a mobile-assisted language learning (MALL) technique was adopted in a classroom formative assessment for holistic language proficiency of listening, vocabulary, and grammar to determine whether it would make a difference in results. For fourteen weeks, this quasi-experiment consisting of a pre-post-test one group design was carried out over two cycles of seven weeks each, with 598 participants. During the experiment, students practiced formative assessment conventionally during the first cycle, while this assessment was done with the medium of two mobile apps: Kahoot and Quizizz during the second cycle. The results of the Oxford Placement Test (OPT), replicated as the pre-test and post-test, indicated that mobile-assisted formative assessment resulted in a statistically-significant positive influence of using mobile apps on students’ overall language proficiency.

Year

Volume

22

Issue

2

Pages

69-89

Physical description

Dates

published
2022

Contributors

  • Alghad International Colleges for Applied Medical Sciences, Saudi Arabia
  • Alghad International Colleges for Applied Medical Sciences, Saudi Arabia

References

  • Abugohar, M, Yunus, K., & Rashid, R. (2019). Smartphone applications as a teaching technique for enhancing tertiary learners’ speaking skills: Perceptions and practices. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 14(9), 47-92. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v14i09.10375
  • Al-Garawi, A. (2019). Investigating the use of Instagram as a MALL tool: The case of Al-Imam University EFL students. Arab World English Journal Theses ID, 233.
  • Al-Saadi, Z. (2020). Gender differences in writing: The mediating effect of language proficiency and writing fluency in text quality. Cogent Education, 7(1), 1770923. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2020.1770923
  • Balchin, K., & Wild, C. (2020). Exploring the role of context and collaboration in normalising technology use in English language teaching in secondary schools in Malaysia. Computer Assisted Language Learning. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1803360
  • Baniabdelrahman, A. A. (2013). Effect of using internet tools on enhancing EFL students’ speaking skill. Journal of Contemporary Research, 3(6), 79-87.
  • Bermúdez, A. B., & Prater, D. L. (1994). Examining the effects of gender and second language proficiency on Hispanic writers’ persuasive discourse. Bilingual Research Journal, 18(3-4), 47-62. https://doi.org/10.1080/15235882.1994.10162667
  • Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2010). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 92(1), 81-90. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172171009200119
  • Bower, M. (2017). Designing for mobile learning. In M. Bower (ed.), Design of technology-enhanced learning (pp. 261-304). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78714-182-720171011
  • Chen, C., & Yeh, H. (2019). Effects of integrating a questioning strategy with game-based learning on students’ language learning performances in flipped classrooms. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 28(3), 347-361. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2019.1618901
  • Coatney, S. (2006). The importance of background knowledge. Teacher Librarian, 34(1), 60. Retrieved from Academic Search Premier database.
  • Corpus, J. H., Iyengar, S. S., & Lepper, M. R. (2005). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations in the classroom: Age differences and academic correlates. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(2), 184-196.
  • Edwards, V. (2020). It is time to make use of technology. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 91(2), 56-57. https://doi.org/10.1080/07303084.2020.1702395
  • Finke, R. A., Ward, T. B., & Smith, S. M. (1992). Creative cognition: Theory, research, and applications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Furrer, C., & Skinner, E. (2003). Sense of relatedness as a factor in children’s academic engagement and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 147-159.
  • Gibbs, G. (1998). Marking and giving feedback. In Graham Gibbs (Ed.), Teaching in higher education: Theory and evidence (pp. 3-37). Open University.
  • Glauser, E.C. (2004). Summary of the Book by Alfie Kohn: Punished by Rewards. The Swiss Deming Institute, 47(8), 1-6.
  • Hamad, M. M., Metwally, A. A., & Alfaruque, S. Y. (2019). The impact of using YouTubes and audio tracks imitation YATI on improving speaking skills of EFL learners. English Language Teaching, 12(6), 191-198.
  • Hidayati, T., & Diana, S. (2019). Students’ motivation to learn English using mobile applications: The case of Duolingo and Hello English. Journal of English Education and Linguistics Studies, 6(2), 189-213. https://doi.org/10.30762/jeels.v6i2.1233
  • Higgins, M., & Grant, F., & Thompson, P. (2010). Formative assessment: Balancing educational effectiveness and resource efficiency. Journal for Education in the Built Environment, 5(2), 4-24. https://doi.org/10.11120/jebe.2010.05020004
  • Jalili, S., Khalaji, H., & Ahmadi, H. (2020). Vocabulary learning in the mobile-assisted flipped classroom in an Iranian EFL context. Teaching English with Technology, 20(4), 82-95. https://tewtjournal.org/download/6-vocabulary-learning-in-the-mobile-assisted-flipped-classroom-in-an-iranian-efl-context-by-shahriar-jalili-hamidreza-khalaji-and-hossein-ahmadi/
  • Jang, H., & Reeve, J. (2006). What teachers say and do to support students’ autonomy during a learning activity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(1), 209-218.
  • Jebur, M. S. (2020). The use of mobile-assisted language learning (MALL) by Iraqi EFL college students’ and their attitudes towards it. Journal of University of Babylon for Humanities, 28(2), 150-160.
  • Jansson, D. G., & Smith, S. M. (1991). Design fixation. Design Studies, 12, 3-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-694X(91)90003-F
  • Kan, A. (2007). An alternative method in the new educational program from the point of performance-based assessment: Rubric scoring scales. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 7(1), 144-152.
  • Kothari, C. R. (2004). Research methodology: Methods and techniques. New Age International.
  • Levene, H. (1960). Robust tests for equality of variances. In Ingram Olkin; Hotelling; et al. (Eds.), Contributors to probability and statistics: Essays in Honor of Harold Hotelling (pp. 278-292). Stanford University Press.
  • Lowenfeld, V. (1957). Creative and mental growth (3rd ed.). MacMillan.
  • Mackey, A., & Gass, S. M. (2005). Second language research: Methodology and design. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Medina, M. (1993). Spanish achievement in a maintenance bilingual education program: Language proficiency, grade and gender comparisons, Bilingual Research Journal, 17(1-2), 57-81. https://doi.org/10.1080/15235882.1993.10162648
  • Mindog, E. (2016). Apps and EFL: A case study on the use of smartphone apps to learn English by four Japanese university students. JALT CALL Journal, 12(1), 3-22.
  • Moghaddas, B., & Bashirnezhad, H. (2016). The pedagogical applications of mobile-assisted language learning (MALL) in improving the Iranian EFL learners’ oral performance. International Journal of Applied Linguistics Translation, 2(1), 8-14.
  • Moreno, A. I., & Vermeulen, A. (2015). Profiling a MALL app for English oral practice: A case study. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 21(10), 1339-1361.
  • Mustafa, E. N. E. (2018). The impact of YouTube, Skype and WhatsApp in improving EFL learners’ speaking skill. International Journal of Contemporary Applied Researches, 5(5), 18-31.
  • Noroozi, A., Rezvan, E., & Ameri-Golestan, A. (2021). Students' perceptions of the incorporation of flipped learning into L2 grammar lessons. Teaching English with Technology, 21(1), 112-130. https://tewtjournal.org/download/8-students-perceptions-of-the-incorporation-of-flipped-learning-into-l2-grammar-lessons-by-ahmad-noroozi-ehsan-rezvani-and-ahmad-ameri-golestan/
  • Nowbattula, P. K., Devi, V. R., & Nimmala, T. (2016). Teaching listening and speaking skills to the pupils of higher education through mobile applications and social networks. Scholar Critic, 3(1), 351-360.
  • Nurhalim, G. A., Saputra, Y., & Pujasari, R. S. (2019). Encouraging students’ speaking through Opentalk app: Participatory action research. Journal of Universitas Siliwangi. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.14738.81608
  • Oxford University Press (OUP) ELT Website (2020). https://elt.oup.com/feature/global/oxford-online-placement/
  • Ramos, L., & Valderruten, A. (2017). Development of listening and linguistic skills through the use of a mobile application. English Language Teaching, 10(9), 95-107.
  • AbRashid, R., Annamalali, N., Saed, H., Yassin, B., Alsmadi, O. (2021). Developing an interactive university orientation app: Potential users' feedback. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies,15(22),165-171.
  • Read, T., & Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2015). The role of a mobile app for listening comprehension training in distance learning to sustain student motivation. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 21(10), 1327-1338.
  • Ruenzel, D. (2000). Gold star junkies. Teacher magazine: News and information for teacher leaders, 11(5), 6-24.
  • Trust, T. (2017) The top five trends in Edtech according to ISTE 2017. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 33(4),126-127. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2017.1350082
  • Wang, J. H., & Guthrie, J. (2004). Modeling the effects of intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, amount of reading, and past reading achievement on text comprehension between U.S. and Chinese students. Reading Research Quarterly, 39(2), 162-186.
  • Watkins, C. (2005). Classrooms as learning communities: A review of research. London Review of Education, 3(1), 47-64.
  • Wiggins, G. P., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design (2nd ed.). Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development ASCD.
  • Wilbourne, M. (2006). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations in the classroom: Age differences and academic correlates. Childhood Education, 82(5), 310-311. Retrieved from Academic Search Premier database.
  • Wooten, J. J., Acchiardo, C., & G. Dirk Mateer, G. D. (2020). Economics is a Kahoot! The Journal of Economic Education, 51(3-4), 380-380. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220485.2020.1804499
  • Wyk, J. V., & Mostert, M. L. (2016). The influence of mother
  • tongue and gender on the acquisition of English (L2): The case of Afrikaans in Windhoek schools, Namibia. Cogent Education, 3(1), 1210997. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2016.1210997
  • Zou, B., & Li, J. (2015). Exploring mobile apps for English language teaching and learning. In F. Helm, L. Bradley, M. Guarda, & S. Thouësny (Eds.), Critical CALL – Proceedings of the 2015 EUROCALL Conference, Padova, Italy (pp. 564-568). Research-publishing.net. https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2015.000394

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

Biblioteka Nauki
2087263

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.ojs-issn-1642-1027-year-2022-volume-22-issue-2-article-8e375289-43b5-387c-9681-8ea7ea0c2074
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.