EN
This draft position of the Sejm concerns the constitutional complaint of 7 July 2015. In the proposed draft position the author claims that the contested Article 136 paras. 3 and 4 of the Act on Real Property Management insofar as it does not provide for the right of the previous owner to demand the return of the property acquired by the State Treasury or a municipality by way of a civil contract, concluded into in the course of the negotiations preceding the initiation of the expropriation, if the property has become unnecessary for a public use, is incompatible with Article 21(2) and Article 64(1) and (2) in conjunction with Article 32 (1) of the Constitution. The procedure for the remainder should be discontinued pursuant to Article 40(1)(1) of the Constitutional Tribunal Act of 2015 due to the inadmissibility of the judgment.